During the Second Industrial Revolution two philosophies combated each other on a global scale. Laissez-Fair economics had ruled for the last few centuries and had created many prosperous nations but abuses of power by wealthy men had turned public opinion against it. Ever since its creation, Socialism begged to be placed head to head with Capitalism and it had finally gotten its chance. Laissez-Fair economics and Socialism both have their pros and cons when implemented in society. The battle between these two ideological works its way throughout society alternating between the protests and debates in the U.S. today to the great terror of the Cold War.
Laissez fair economics remained popular for many years after their creation during the Enlightenment era. Many governments had seen the benefits of allowing their people to govern their own economic policies business grew providing concrete evidence of its effectiveness. The lower tax rates associated with a hands off approach remained popular with the people of any nation as did the increased in personal privacy. Laissez-Fair economics allows the free spread of ideas and the motivation that any man can make his tomorrow better than today. It is this motivation that causes men and women to rise from poverty to head of a multi-billion dollar business. No one will hand this sort of opportunity to you and there will be obstacles but the beauty of such a system is the possibility for growth and self betterment despite where you start from.
Even though it has incredible benefits a Capitalist society still has its drawbacks. To put it simply Capitalism encourages greed and certain abuses of power will always remain present in the system. Those who constantly attempt to ri...
... middle of paper ...
...market economics. These two styles of government clash over basic human motivation. Laissez-Fair economics have many benefits and better account for human nature. Its downfall is the greed and apathy of those involved as human corruption creates discontent in workers who can easily be enticed by socialism. A Socialistic government holds the promise of utopia and equality for those who have been downtrodden by society. Unfortunately such a society would never work as long as human beings are involved. With no ability to raise or lower your standard of living such a society quickly robs a person of their self worth and desire to contribute to society. While each society has its advantages and disadvantages Capitalism is the only society to survive for any length of time as all previous Socialist societies have become dictatorships before they reached a utopia.
In this essay, the author
- Analyzes how laissez-fair economics and socialism both have their pros and cons when implemented in society.
- Explains that laissez-fair economics allowed the free spread of ideas and the motivation that any man can make his tomorrow better than today.
- Opines that capitalism encourages greed and certain abuses of power will always remain present in the system.
- Imagines a society where every man works for his brother and neighbor to better society. a benevolent dictator and government equally redistribute the wealth between all of the people.
- Analyzes how socialism robs men and women of the basic desire to work hard and with a purpose. this cycle has been the downfall of many socialist nations.
- Explains that socialism's ideological supporters have battled with the supporters of free market economics over basic human motivation.
Related
- opinion
- analytical
- argumentative
- explanatory
- What Kind Of Capitalism Do We Want in Americaopinion essayFirst of all, I will provide a quick overview of the evolution of capitalism since the Great Depression, which I believe is necessary in order to understand the capitalism of today and some of the problems to it. Then I will analyze four different problematic areas of free-market capitalism in the US compared with the Scandinavian government-managed capitalism. I will then discuss what kind of capitalism we want: We being different interest groups, such as the shareholders, the C.E.O.'s, the average worker and the poor. Finally I will discuss what values might be at stake in capitalism.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that they will provide a quick overview of the evolution of capitalism since the great depression. they will analyze four different problematic areas of free-market capitalism in the us compared with the scandinavian government-managed capitalism.
- Explains that the 1930s great depression threatened to destroy capitalism, leading to abandoning laissez-faire capitalism and embracing the new deal concept of government-managed capitalism.
- Opines that america has the largest real gdp per capita in the world, but this is only a measure of the economy, not the average american's well-being.
- Explains that the rich are getting richer, which shows signs of plutocratic conditions ruling the u.s. c.e.o.'s are paid huge salaries.
- Explains that the oil industry in the u.s. has major interests in extracting oil from middle eastern oil fields in order to supply the future american industry with the needed oil.
- Opines that the prices in the marketplace and the supply of products reflect consumer preferences, but the popular will is not always the right one. morally, companies should not listen to what the consumers prefer but what they could benefit from.
- Opines that it is essential to draw attention to the different groups of "we" wanting different kinds of capitalism.
- Opines that shareholders, c.e.o.'s, board members and auditors are better off in a free-market capitalism than in government-managed capitalism.
- Explains that in a government-managed capitalist country, like the scandinavian countries, public goods or services like health care and education are available to everyone — this kind of capitalism would be the most suitable for the average worker and the poor.
- Argues that freedom and equality don't always go hand-in-hand in a democratic, free-market capitalist country like the u.s.
1362 wordsRead More - Marxism Industrial Revolutionanalytical essayCapitalism was a very strong form of government in fact, it was so strong that it was one of the factors that led to the evolution of the Industrial Revolution. Capitalism is a form of government where it’s based on open competition in a free market, in which individuals and companies own the means of production and operate for profit. The Industrial Revolution that began in 1780 in England, was a time shift from using hand tools to machines producing the demands of humans. Through the growth of capitalism, much of society began to question themselves whether the effects of capitalism on society, the nature of human beings, and the ideal social and economic situation was unjust or not. Karl Marx and Andrew Carnegie were two people who disagreed
In this essay, the author
- Explains that capitalism is a form of government where individuals and companies own the means of production and operate for profit.
- Analyzes how karl marx disagreed with capitalism and the effects that it will bring amongst society. the communist manifesto discusses that through capitalism the bourgeoisie benefit of the proletarians.
- Explains marx's theory of marxism where he discusses the imbalances of the working and ruling class.
- Explains that andrew carnegie was one of the commanders during the industrial revolution because he helped build americas largest steel industry.
721 wordsRead More - In Persuasion As A Rat Trapanalytical essayIt is this notion which gives the capitalists the opportunity and the means to exploit people in the society, through their wants and needs for an easy, nonchalant lifestyle. The problem arises when we start seeing these capitalists as saviors - as rescuers, and sometimes even incarnations of God - who save the people under them, from the hardened, miserable, and volatile life which they may have lead otherwise. It is at this moment where we commit our biggest mistake: put in our trust, faith and our life in the hands of these capitalists. They hardwire such people - make them feel like a prince, where in reality all they are, are peasants being manipulated and controlled to fulfill the personal objectives of these capitalists. It is in moments like these, where a person must realize, that all these comforts - these resources, these status privileges, the capitalists trust in them - are all but ‘baits’, intricately thought of and designed to ‘lure’ an individual into the trap from which - despite tremendous efforts - if caught, it is extremely difficult to escape from. It is, in moments like these, where one must develop and possess the mental
In this essay, the author
- Analyzes how the world is an elaborate rat trap, where the luxuries, privileges, and resources lure those foolish enough to possess materialistic life goals.
- Analyzes how an orderly structured society does not allow an individual to grow and flourish. it uses drugs, brainwashing, artificial memories, and preconceived templates to form a plethora of ‘standardized’ people.
- Analyzes how the "location indicators" and artificial memories are profoundly used to "lure" workers into the grasp of the facility owners.
- Analyzes how the facility uses the concept of a 'home' as bait to keep the workers entranced by the fact, that they are indeed safe and sound.
- Explains that capitalism blurs personal and professional identity, causing a confusion between wants and needs.
- Opines that capitalists exploit people in society through their wants and needs for an easy, nonchalant lifestyle. they make people feel like peasants being manipulated to fulfill their personal objectives.
1822 wordsRead More - Industrialism Essayargumentative essayThe man whose writings “most reflects and explains the character of the early Industrial Revolution” was enlightenment thinker Adam Smith (Sanders 223). To this very day, he is still referenced as one of the most important economic theorists throughout history. Through his writing in The Wealth of Nations (perhaps his biggest piece of work) in 1776, he essentially created the theory of free-market capitalism and the laissez-faire model that is still used today.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that andrew carnegie was a staunch believer in the free-market system and advocated for the social darwinist theory of survival of the fittest and self-determination.
- Analyzes how smith and carnegie were concerned about the "proper administration of wealth", or how money was being distributed among society. they believe that the wealthy had a duty to serve the poor by investing money in trusts and public works.
- Explains karl marx's theory and philosophy, which was coined as marxism, in his book, the communist manifesto.
- Explains that the industrial revolution was pivotal in the world's history. the enlightenment thinker adam smith created the theory of free-market capitalism and the laissez-faire model in the wealth of nations.
- Compares marx's communist and free-market capitalist visions. smith and carnegie strongly support the laissez-faire, hands-off attitude of the government.
1315 wordsRead More - Compare And Summary: Idealistic Communism And Equalityanalytical essaySince the emergence of husbandry there has been increasing political inequality. There have been many who have theorized on ways to minimize or completely eliminate this inequality two of the most notable theorists being Karl Marx and Giuseppe Mazzini. Karl Marx and his theory of communism was more correct on how to solve the problems of European society. He was more correct because he showed more concern for members of the lower class, there are serious flaws in nationalism that are harmful to society, and because it is a system that could be implemented in stages or even partially.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that since the emergence of husbandry there has been increasing political inequality. theorists like karl marx and giuseppe mazzini have theorized on ways to minimize or completely eliminate it.
- Analyzes how both karl marx and giuseppe mazzini wrote literature on what they believed to be the best way to ensure equality.
- Analyzes how marx focuses his plan for helping europe on the lower class. in the communist manifesto, he claimed that the struggle between the classes was the real struggle in europe, not the invading nations.
- Analyzes the flaws in nationalism that made it harmful for europe rather than beneficial.
- Analyzes the flaws of nationalism and its lack of focus on the mistreatment of the working class. mazzini's only plans were to overthrow the absolutist monarchs, drive out invading nations, and re-draw the borders.
- Opines that marx's ideas were correct because he focused on the issues that had the most impact in europe, which was inequality between classes.
793 wordsRead More - Capitalism: The Rationalization of Irrationalityopinion essayCapitalism as an economic system has not been around for a very long time. Stanford indicates that this economic system began in the mid-1700s in Europe . For a considerably young system, it almost seems impossible to imagine a different way of living. Capitalism has become deeply embedded in our social structures; it is naturalized as a way of doing day to day things. If this is the case, then we as humans have a long way to go if we are to achieve social and economic justice. The question I aim to explore is whether capitalism is capable of achieving socio-economic justice. I am arguing that it cannot achieve justice because there is too much focus on profit rather than people and it dislocates the consumers from the modes of production which indirectly promotes social inequality. Our current economic system which I will be interchangeably using as capitalism throughout the paper will examine why the focus on profit is detrimental to the social well-being of people and explain how capitalism is divisive and why this can pose negative outcomes for individuals and communities. It is with these arguments that outline the need for a fundamental change to how our economy is structured and managed.
In this essay, the author
- Argues that capitalism cannot achieve socio-economic justice because there is too much focus on profit rather than people and dislocates the consumers from the modes of production.
- Explains that the pursuit of profit is one of the underlying features that make up our capitalist system.
- Explains how the drive of profit stems from within the economy. stanford illustrates the mechanics and relationships between investors (lenders) and corporations.
- Explains that investors have the ability to reverse their investment choices if they feel that their investments are not generating the profits they had hoped to gain.
- Explains that the pursuit of profit has highlighted another factor that impedes on the realization of socio-economic justice: capitalism's ability to distance people from the social consequences of focusing upon profit.
- Explains that neoliberal economists would answer 'nothing' because consumers have the individual freedom to pursue their wants and fulfill their needs as they see fit.
- Explains that the neoliberal agenda has made it possible for companies to seek out "investor-friendly" countries where taxes, environment and employment laws and policies are not as strict.
- Opines that companies operating in low taxed countries do not have to pay out a significant amount of their profit to the country they are currently operating.
- Explains that capitalism is characterized as a capitalist economy because it is structured around the pursuit of profit and production goods are taken up through wage labour. exploitation is underpinning this simplistic definition of capitalism.
- Opines that private consumption spending accounts for half or more of gdp in developed capitalist economies.
2216 wordsRead More - United States of Inequalityopinion essayDespite the unwavering economic disparity caused by the flaws of capitalism and other dooming views of capitalism, nevertheless it allows:
In this essay, the author
- Analyzes how capitalism has been the central force behind the growth of the united states' progressive economy.
- Opines that despite the unwavering economic disparity caused by the flaws of capitalism and other dooming views, it allows:
- Explains that businesses organize economic resources to produce goods and/or serviced. entrepreneurs can continuously [form] and [establish new innovations] to discover new and better ways to use resources.
- Explains that capitalism encourages a higher standard of living of the overall quality of life in the us, through successful accomplishments of many businesses, corporations, and banks.
- Explains that the us is a combination of meritocracy, class privilege, and wealth.
- Explains that the government's role is critical whereas the legislations they pass can speed up or slow down the widening gap of economic inequality.
- Explains that republicans presidents ronald reagan and the two bushes father and son redistributed wealth upward, accounting for tax breaks for the wealthy than working class citizens.
- Opines that the reagan years had a higher average economic growth and interest rates, inflation, and unemployment fell faster than pre-regime years. however, no progress was made on the issue of economic inequality.
- Analyzes how michael moore's film capitalism: a love story argues that the influence of certain individuals, corporations, and banks in politics is overwhelming.
- Argues that the stereotype that holds that majority of the wealthy men and women serve in government occupy position in financial regulations is partly true.
- Explains that globalization is the integration of states/countries through high level contact, communication, and trade that binds them into a common fate.
- Opines that the magnitude of unions is on a continuous decline and that businesses are exploiting their power to illegally gain more wealth.
- Opines that the hope for a more equality in wealth distribution should not be discarded. the method of correction must be strongly executed along with democratic principles.
- Opines that the government should increase taxes on the wealthy based on their income, redistributing the revenue collected as taxes to especially the middle and lower class citizens.
- Cites berliner, uri, and google's article, haves and have-nots: income inequality in america.
- Analyzes how ellis, sara, argues against fixing income inequality.
- Explains gutman, huck. economic inequality in us. n.p., 1 july 2002.
- Explains moberg, david. to achieve economic equality, american workers need unions.
- Explains that moore, michael, dir. capitalism: a love story. narr. michael moore. overture films.
- Explains niskanen, william a., and stephen moore's policy analysis.
- Explains that public affairs department, federal reserve bank. everyday economics. n.p.
2285 wordsRead More - Socialism and Capitalismexplanatory essayCapitalism and socialism are essentially opposing schools of thought in economics. Socialists believe social and economic inequality is bad for society and that the government is responsible for reducing it through programs that benefit the poor. On the other hand, capitalists believe that the government does not use economic resources as efficiently as private enterprises, and therefore society is better off with a free market. Each economic system has had its high and low points in history, but both capitalism and socialism, if applied correctly, have the potential to be extremely successful and prosperous.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that capitalism and socialism are on opposite sides of the spectrum. capital is owned, operated, and traded for generating profits for private owners or shareholders.
- Explains that pure capitalism promotes a laissez-faire kind of free market, whereas socialism relies on the markets to determine investment, production, and distribution decisions.
- Explains the differences between socialist and capitalist economic systems, including their social and political effects.
- Explains that despite radical differences between the near-polar opposite economic systems, there are still a few aspects of each that they have in common.
- Explains that capitalism and socialism are opposing schools of thought in economics. socialists believe social and economic inequality is bad for society and that the government is responsible for reducing it.
641 wordsRead More - galtsanalytical essayCapitalism is the only economic system remotely comparable to Individual freedom, as in many or every form of economy, a person in one shape of form or another is a slave to the “public good”. ...
In this essay, the author
- Argues that capitalism respects and recognizes a person’s right to control the product of their own mind.
- Analyzes how ayn rand presented capitalism with great taste and mastery throughout the entire book of "atlas shrugged".
- Explains that capitalism is the only economic system remotely comparable to individual freedom. the taggarts and reardons are at the mercy of the government's wishes and whims.
- Explains that capitalism is the only system consistent with the right to life. anti-capitalism abrogates this right in one way or another.
- Analyzes the violation of private property in atlas shrugged, stating that sacrifice, not merit, is morality.
- Explains that capitalism is the only economic system that follows an objective in accordance with the set of standards set forth.
- Opines that capitalism is the most effective economic system, but only second to moral economy. ayn rand's "atlas shrugged" shows capitalism as freedom.
721 wordsRead More - The Enlightenment and a Desire for a Free Marketexplanatory essayLaissez faire was the first huge reformation of government and was, in fact, invented by common people. It is simply the idea of not letting the government interfere with peoples’ private businesses. This method dates back all the way to ancient China (200 BC). The people of Han and Ming dynasties argued over the government being an active participant in economy. They believed that regulated official prices and checked products would lead to an economic success. Confucius, on the other hand, believed that people should decide on their market themselves and have the full authority to advertise and sell their products in any way they wanted. Although the Han dynasty didn’t accept this idea, the Song and Ming followed laissez faire until their dynasti...
In this essay, the author
- Explains that adam smith's quote proves what people in the enlightenment period wanted most — free market economy and public services.
- Explains that laissez faire was the first huge reformation of government and was invented by common people. it is the idea of not letting the ruler interfere with segments of economy that didn't belong to him.
- Explains that laissez faire is the idea of not letting the government interfere with people's private businesses.
- Explains that adam smith coined the phrase "invisible hand of economy" to describe how the market constantly changes itself, as if it was moved by an invisible hand.
- Explains that adam smith was against mercantilism, which was keeping a surplus of important types of goods, and that the failure of perfect economy was partly the ruler's fault.
- Explains that modern economy was heavily influenced by the ideas formed in the enlightenment.
- Explains that the market as we know it today has derived from the enlightenment age. adam smith's ideas connect to the modern world.
- Cites wikipedia's laissez faire. wikipedia, 25 feb. 2011 (last edited). web. 1 mar. 2011.
- Explains gaynor ellis, elisabeth, and anthony esler's "new economic thinking" in world history: the modern era.
- Describes adam smith's work, which was published by the library of economics and liberty in 2008.
1442 wordsRead More