Cold War Argumentative Analysis

1487 Words3 Pages

In 1945, once the end of the World War II appeared, the world was shaken, crumbled, and spat out into a new emerging order. The United States and the Soviet Union faced the inevitable. No other state was capable of dominating the great regions devastated by the war. Nevertheless, alongside this new order appeared a new conflict - the Cold War. The clash of two titans has been an important milestone for many historians, political scientists and international relations specialist. This essay focuses on the question, whether the USA was right with their calculation of the Soviet threat during the first breaths of the Cold War. It develops in three parts. First one considers the US perception, looking at the emergence of the conflict through their eyes. The second part shifts towards the Soviet interpretation. The last part evaluates both views while determining the correctness of the US approach.
After the end of the World War II, the American majority of the population put their trust into the future cooperation with the Soviet Union. Subsequently, Mr. Kissinger laid emphasis on the US original post-war intention, which promoted the new era as built on the good faith and cooperation. The conservative magazine Life claimed, "the Russians look like Americans, dress like Americans and think like Americans". The optimism was evident. However, as …show more content…

Any signs of aggression must be destructed immediately. Mr. Lundestad mentions in his book, that the rise of Hitler lied in American stomachs for long and the feeling of guilt which developed due to their initial policy of isolationism only added to the aggression-containment perspective. Moreover, this lesson put an end to the isolationism concept completely. The logic behind these facts sheds light on the US behavior towards the Soviet Union. The fear for American ideals to endure in the world unchallenged was

More about Cold War Argumentative Analysis

Open Document