On Thursday, March 2, 2017, at 2:55 p.m., the investigator traveled to the following cities in the Riverside County area; Palm Springs, Cathedral City and to the Desert Hot Springs to conduct cold-calls with the witnesses who may have information about the Ronnie Curtis case. Each of the following witnesses, Ms. Mayla Padzik, Ms. Annette Reiz and Ms. Barbara have not returned any previous phone calls made to their listed phone numbers to secure their statements about claimant Ms. Curtis’s. In an attempt to locate and establish their identities to include their personal statements a thorough check was conducted through HUB’s services which additional addresses were discovered to follow-up with each one of the witnesses with this developed information.
On the evening of Ms. Heggar¡¦s death she was alone in her house. Eddie Ray Branch, her grandson, testified that he visited his grandmother on the day that she was killed. He was there till at least 6:30 p.m. Lester Busby, her grandnephew, and David Hicks arrived while her grandson was still there and they saw him leave. They then went in to visit with Ms. Heggar. While they were there, Lester repaid Ms. Heggar 80 dollars, which he owed her. They left around 7:15 p.m. and went next door to a neighboring friend¡¦s house. David Hick¡¦s went home alone from there to get something but returned within ten minutes of leaving. Because he was only gone for 5-10 minutes, prosecution theorized TWO attacks on Ms. Heggar because he could not have killed his grandmother during this 5-10 minute period alone. At 7:30 p.m., 15 minutes after the two had left, an insurance salesman called to see Ms. Heggar. He knocked for about 2 or 3 minutes and got no reply. Her door was open but the screen door was closed. Her TV was on. He claimed to have left after about 5 minutes and then he returned the next morning. The circumstances were exactly the same. With concern, he went to the neighbor¡¦s house and called the police. His reasoning for being there was because the grandmother¡¦s family had taken out burial insurance three days before she had died.
I responded to the listed address in reference to a mising person call. Upon arrival, I made contact with Kristin Boutwell over the phone. Boutwell advised that her son's name is Samuel Parker Boutwell. Kristin advised that on this date, his step mother(Jesse Boutwell) took him to school at Charles Henderson High School around 0730 hours. Kristin advised that she hasn’t heard from him and he has not answered anyone phone calls. Kristin advised that she has called Jesse, his father(Mark) and his grandfather(Joe Boutwell) and no one has seen him or heard from him. Kristin did advise that Samuel has a frind named Jacob Spivey that he hangs with who lived somewhere on Deer Field Drive in Troy, Alabama.
When looking into Mrs. Hall’s record they found that she was arrested in July 2005 for suspected involvement of a grow house on one of the Hall’s property. At the time of the arrest she was working for Palm Bay Fire Department, she was employed there for the past 11 years. After she was arrested she was fired and began volunteering at the Malabar Fire Department (Pavul, 2011). ...
On 03/25/2016 at about 1929 HRS, I received a phone call from Deputy David Melcher advising he was currently at the scene of a Burglary, located on the NW corner of Juco Rd and Frey Street extension (NE 30 Rd and NE 10 Av). Deputy Melcher advised that upon his inspection of the scene he had observed some very good Shoe Impressions and some possible fingerprints and palm prints as well.
“I agree with Ms. Krejci that the entire file should have been disclosed with the publics record request, but that does not make it discoverable.” Feeney said. “I understand her frustration that she wasn 't given the same information that another defense attorney was. When I discovered what had happened, which was in august, I immediately requested the entire file from the Phoenix Police Department so that I could disclose it to the defense council. I didn’t do that because I believed that the information was discoverable or relevant. I did it as a professional courtesy. So that we were on the same field, and so that she felt that she had everything tha...
On Wednesday, January 4, 2016 at 1400 hrs. at the 84th Precinct, I conferred with the reporter, Sgt. Cheesewright, Field Intelligence Officer, PBBN. He stated that he executed a search warrant at 765 Park Avenue 2nd Floor, Brooklyn, NY. The target of the search warrant was Mr. Alexander Atkins who lives on the 2nd floor. He was observed previously by a CI in possession of a firearm. During the search warrant, Mr. Atkins was found in one bedroom while PAA Marcia Mackey was in another bedroom, both on the 2 nd Floor of the house. PAA Mackey immediately identified herself as a member of the service to ESU members, who in turn notified Sgt. Cheesewright. Mr. Atkins was asked by Sgt. Cheesewright if he possessed anything that he was not suppose to have in the room and he admitted to having several glassines of heroine for personal use.
Ps, Shamalee Lawson and Samory Hill, allege excessive force and false arrest. Ps allege that they were inside the park near basketball courts. P allege that MOS Napolitano, Grieco, Minardi, Radonice and other MOS assaulted and searched them. P allege they were arrest along with 17 other non-parties. P Lawson alleges that MOS did not provide a property voucher for his personal property. The criminal disposition in unknown at the time. No other information is known at this time. It is unclear what role, if any, MOS Thomas Napolitano played in this
This officer placed Smith under arrested for Failure to Identified and Ofc. Malerich transported her to the Griffith Police Station. Once at the stated this officer inventoried Smith's pursue and located her Illinois ID
Upon arrival I conducted a field interview with Williams who stated he and his girlfriend (Washington) were arguing because she was talking to him in a nasty manner, next the complainant stated Washington's 14 year old son (Aushawn Washington) started a verbal altercation with him. Next Williams stated Aushawn started shooting a BB gun at him so he started running after the child, afterward Williams stated he walked to the hood of his White Ford Expedition and Washington punched him in the mouth and that's when the two parties started fighting. Williams further stated Washington then attempted to get in the vehicle and when he tried closing the door Williams pushed it open striking her niece.
McAlister case valid rules of evidence and testimony were used to prove Jose McAlister is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. In this case, circumstantial evidence demonstrated a factual matter by proving other events from which the occurrence of the matter can be reasonably inferred. The evidence of the map found in McAlister’s car proved there was a relationship between McAlister and the murder of the victim Venzie Viktum. Furthermore, the evidence received by law enforcement was relevant, reliable, and competent. The evidence was gathered by a probable cause and was not prejudicial, misleading, inaccurate or distracting. The court case had many valid testimony’s that prove Jose is guilty of the charges against him. The prosecutions’ witness Willy will testify at the preliminary hearing and admitted he was in a drug distribution conspiracy with Jose. Additionaly the prosecutions discovery would be available and applicable to be called by the intern at the government laboratory that conducted the certificate of analysis analyzing the evidence found and the body. The prosecution has plans to call Jose’s former attorney that knows everything about Jose’s illegal activities. Futheremore the prosecution will also call Nancy Nozzy who is the neighborhood watch caption that information. The expert testimony from the government laboratory has specialized knowledge that will help the trier of fact to understand the evidence that Jose was guilty. The testimonies from
Sander’s justice was focused on the needs of the victims as well as the community. The testimony from the victim’s family; in this case the adult grand-children played a vital role in this case, followed by the offender’s testimony. Making things as right as possible for all parties involved. In this case, the Defense Attorney refrained from any inadequate information. Her duty was to present the facts and non-bias judgments as part of this case. The Maricopa Sheriffs department played an important and critical role, they exercised discretion when arresting and investigating Mr. Sanders. The Maricopa Sherriff’s department had an ethical responsibility and made non-biased, non-discriminatory calls and protect citizens. The Prosecutor’s ethical dilemma was the decisions how to prosecute Mr. Sanders after hearing family members testified in his defense. Judge Dilworth’s ethics played an important part, his interpretation of the law without having personal feelings or agendas to interfere with his responsibility. Investigators, Defense Attorneys, Prosecutors and Judges each have the power to make a decision, enforce the law, protect the constitution and serve the public (Introduction to Criminal
"Know the Cases." Innocence Project. Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law, n.d. Web. 1 Mar 2011. .
Stewart, S. D., & Croudep, C. (1998-2012). The clark county prosecuting attorney. Retrieved from http://www.clarkprosecutor.org/index.htm
During my interview with Dr. James R. Metts, Sheriff of Lexington County S.C., he informed me of the procedures involved in the Shari Faye Smith and Debra May Helmick case. He noted that "the Behavioral Unit in the FBI was extremely helpful in solving this case by giving us a psychological profile of the perpetrator and advising us on how to handle the media throughout the case" (Metts).
No position in your company is quite as important as your call center employee. These employees have a direct line to customers, sometimes when retention is on the line. The way these employees interact with these customers will help showcase the company in a positive or negative light. The way the company is portrayed depends a great deal on the amount of effort you are willing to put into these employees.