Cloudbank Research Paper

1243 Words3 Pages

So, what about the future? Huxley has shown what his future looks like, but many other minds have shown their predicted futures as well. One such mind is the one that truly helped technology, and computing as a whole, get to where it is today. In a recent interview with theverge.com’s Nilay Patel, Bill Gates had mentioned his stance on many issues currently being debated by the United Nations. Numerous topics were discussed, including the futures of health, farming, money, and technology. These topics were especially focused on the middle and lower classes. During the health segment of the interview, Gates mentioned that “polio, guinea worm, elephantiasis, river blindness, and blinding trachoma can all be eradicated by 2030,” and “the number …show more content…

While never specifically stated, it is presumed that Cloudbank is entirely digital in its construction, allowing for a very different style of architecture and life. Cloudbank’s cityscape is composed entirely of ornate skyscrapers, and the roads are etched with beautiful carvings and drawings. Everything in the city is simply beautiful. It is the ideals of the people, instead, that resonate perfectly with the ideals of today. Cloudbank operates completely on the opinions of the people. All aspects of the city are able to be completely controlled through polls. From the next fast food restaurant to the weather tomorrow, Cloudbank is completely malleable. There was just one difference- not everyone’s votes were equal. A city with no money or needs still needs a currency, and the currency of Cloudbank was popularity. The more influential a citizen was, the more they were able to influence and modify their city. This currency was completely accepted, because the lives of the citizens in Cloudbank are also completely malleable. Any citizen would be able to choose to do whatever they wish to do as a career, for careers were primarily for the benefit of the person wanting one. (Interestingly, this resonates with the Humanistic perspective of psychology, which many psychologists consider to be quite opposite from the Behaviouristic perspective, which was used substantially in …show more content…

What’s the use of doing what you love if no one remembers what you discovered? Why have a place that everyone can influence, when the decisions that are made one day are the same as the decisions made one year ago. After all, people’s ideas always become cyclical eventually. The Camerata show us that even in a place that many would consider perfect, there can still be trouble. Cloudbank had no manipulation, no social hierarchy, no jobs or conflict or any issue at all. In fact, the biggest problem that Cloudbank had was that the people had too much control over what they wanted. The citizens’ ideas were fleeting, and while they meant well, they inadvertently created a place with no permanence or sense of worth. Many optimistic futurists believe that if we are just able to achieve self-enlightenment, humanity could be spared all pain and suffering. Transistor, unfortunately, shows us that this is not the

Open Document