Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Technological Singularity essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
From the first imaginative thought to manipulate nature to the development of complex astronomical concepts of space exploration, man continues to this day to innovate and invent products or methods that improve and enhance humankind. Though it has taken 150 million years to reach current day, the intellectual journey was not gradual in a linear sense. If one was to plot significant events occurring throughout human existence, Mankind’s ability to construct new ideas follows a logarithmic path, and is rapidly approaching an asymptote, or technological singularity. This singularity event has scientists both supporting and rejecting the concept of an imaginative plateau; the largest topic discussed is Artificial Intelligence (A.I.). When this technological singularity is reached, it is hypothesized that man’s greatest creation, an artificial sapient being, will supersede human brain capacity. According to some, this event will lead to the extermination of mankind as humans are deemed obsolete. Yet others are projecting a mergence between A.I. and Humanity, a gradual conversion of man and machine. Will the projected apex of our technical evolution be a gradual or abrupt end of mankind?
The Technological singularity is defined by three concepts: 1.) the moment when an artificial intelligence becomes super intelligent, capable of improving itself more rapidly than the greatest human mind, 2.) Scientific breakthroughs rise extra exponentially, with the potential of new ideas every few seconds, and 3.) The point at which the future cannot be predicted beyond in a scientific sense.
Looking solely at the first concept, technological singularity is the most pressing in today’s society especially with multiple films depicting apoc...
... middle of paper ...
...achines will think for man. At this point a logical A.I. may realize man’s intellectual fallibility and destroy the weaker species for resource control. In other words A.I. seeks self-preservation with the destruction of Mankind. One survey entry responded with a side note that could be a more accurate destruction of mankind. Man himself will destroy himself long before he is ever granted the chance to create an artificially formidable or superior enemy.
Whether or not A.I. does replace mankind one should not dismiss that this rapidly approaching technological singularity phenomena is reality. Great change has happened, is happening, and will continue to happen as long as the ability to learn exists, organic or artificial. So when humanity reaches its climax and does end, it is known that it is not the end of knowledge, it is a new direction towards knowledge.
... in 21th century, and it might already dominate humans’ life. Jastrow predicted computer will be part of human society in the future, and Levy’s real life examples matched Jastrow’s prediction. The computer intelligence that Jastrow mentioned was about imitated human brain and reasoning mechanism. However, according to Levy, computer intelligence nowadays is about developing AI’s own reasoning pattern and handling complicated task from data sets and algorithms, which is nothing like human. From Levy’s view on today’s version of AI technology, Jastrow’s prediction about AI evolution is not going to happen. As computer intelligence does not aim to recreate a human brain, the whole idea of computer substitutes human does not exist. Also, Levy said it is irrelevant to fear AI may control human, as people in today’s society cannot live without computer intelligence.
Kurzweil’s view of this thought is positive because he believes artificial intelligence is the future as appose to Carr who thinks negatively because we are currently revolving our actions around technology too much. Carr believes technology effects every thing around us including our every day lives. He also states that we are on the way to having artificial intelligence. Kurzweil’s theory of artificial intelligence will be greatly exceeding stating that, “The rate of technological change will not be limited to human mental speeds. Machine intelligence will improve its own abilities in a feedback cycle that unaided human intelligence will not be able to follow”(Kurzweil 470). Therefore explaining that artificially intelligent machines will be able to solely improve themselves making it not possible for humans to follow, hence changing the way the world is. Also claiming that, “Nanobots will interact with biological neurons to vastly extend human experience by creating virtual reality from within the nervous system”(Kurzweil 471). Carr agrees more in a current point of view that the Internet is becoming artificially intelligent and discusses how the founders of Google “speak(s) frequently of their desire to turn their search engine into an artificial intelligence, a HAL-like machine that might be connected directly to our brains”(Carr 116). Which connects back to Kurzweil’s theory but just in a present point of view. Also Kurzweil believes that through Singularity, machines will be able to give help to a person in such a simple way. Although Carr’s article goes in agreement with what Kurzweil theory is Carr himself does not believe that the revolution of technology is a good thing, he simply agrees that we are heading to artificial intelligence. Carr’s text shows
John Markoff's "The Doomsday Machine" is an intriguing view on how our technology may exponentially improve into the future, but the essay fails to support the thesis statement that our technology will eventually destroy the human race. His dire predictions for our future are based on theories as well as conclusions that are themselves based on theories. These predictions do not account for how other simultaneous technological advancements and the desire for profit will affect our world. It ignores the power of human imagination, ingenuity, feelings, and personal motivation. There is also a complete disregard for God's plan.
Nick Bilton starts “Artificial Intelligence as a Threat” with a comparison of Ebola, Bird flu, SARS, and artificial intelligence. Noted by Bilton, humans can stop Ebola, bird flu, and SARS. However, artificial intelligence, if it ever exceeds human intelligence, would not be stoppable by humans. Bilton, in his article, argues that AI is the biggest threat to humans at our current time, more serious than Ebola and other diseases. Bilton references many books and articles which provide examples of threats of AI.
Bennett’s definition of “artificial intelligence” is personal devices that retrieve information for humans, and Ito’s is algorithms that extract data from the internet. Bennett and Ito have different definitions of “artificial intelligence,” but within their articles, they both pose the same question, “Are the dangers of artificial intelligence underestimated?” Bennett sees health concerns, such as brain atrophy, as a danger due to over use of A.I. and Ito sees the amplification of the worst of human society as a
Currently, computers can calculate and run algorithms much faster than humans, and if strong A.I. was to exist, these technological beings would be intelligently superior to human kind. Elon Musk, a world renowned technological genius, fears Silicon Valley’s rush into artificial intelligence, because he believes it poses a threat to humanity (Dowd, Maureen). Musk stated that “one reason to colonize Mars – so that we’ll have a bolt-hole if A.I. goes rogue and turns on humanity” (Dowd, Maureen). The possibility of this outcome is real because if strong A.I. was to exist, they have the potentially to surpass humans in every aspect. The main difference between A.I. and humans is that humans are conscious beings that can think for themselves. If A.I. was to develop consciousness, they would be able to do every task much more efficiently than humans. According to Stephen Hawking, “If people design computer viruses, someone will design AI that improves and replicates itself. This will be a new form of life that outperforms humans” (Sulleyman, Aatif). This world-renowned physicist believes that A.I. will begin to self-improve upon themselves through an algorithm that allows A.I. to learn. Ultimately, this technological being will advance to a point where it realizes that it does not need humans anymore. “Back in 2015, he [Stephen Hawking] also
These estimates reinforce the claim that the singularity should be common knowledge because not only is this prediction in the not so distant future, but it is also surrounded by Proctor's natural ignorance in the sense that a large portion of the population is completely unaware that this event is even on the horizon. In addition to the ignorance of the event itself, the singularity could cause implications that have been previously irrelevant, such as whether human-like artificial intelligence (AI) should be given human rights, and computers becoming self-improving which would cause the gap between computer intelligence and human intelligence to grow further and further. The argument could be made that the implications that arise due to computers overtaking mankind as the smartest thing on earth should be dealt with when they present themselves, adopting the philosophy of "we'll cross that bridge when we get there", but if we wait until then to start problem solving, it could be too little too late. Assuming the singularity increases computer development through self-improving computers, the general apathy and ignorance surrounding the event could ultimately lead to the downfall of mankind in the worst-case
A well supported outlook towards the future of technology would be “cautiously optimistic.” Nuclear fission is one example of this. While is did further our understanding of atomic theory and resulted in a solution to many energy woes, it also caused the tragedies of Hiroshima, Nagasaki, and Chernobyl. Looking towards the 21st century, artificial intelligence is shaping up to be another highly controversial piece of technology that we are only beginning to understand. As George Santayana once said, “those who cannot remember the past are doomed to repeat it.” We can only hope that the world has learned an important lesson from these tragedies: never underestimate the power of
This leads to the idea of humanity becoming second best, but it also brings up whether or not it’s smart to create such an intelligence when it could have such drastic possibilities. Yes, machines could force us to be their slaves, taking over our entire civilization, so is it worth it to develop such machines for the sake of saying ‘we did it’? Taking into consideration these ideas, humanity needs to ask itself whether or not creating intelligent machines could lead to our demise as a
Fellow countrymen and women, I have called upon you today into an extraordinary session as we are on the verge of being eternal submissives of Singularity which is looming to engulf our freedom to extinction. AI superintelligence which our race can not equate has initiated the run of its own complex system. The significant proficient technical progress has initiated a rapid progress that is accelerating a boom of intelligence leaving humans to strive behind. This superintelligence has beaten our capabilities in every relevant endeavor and shows no signs of regressing as it outmaneuvers our human competences. Thus, unless AI guarantees us to coexist, it can inexorably result in our extinction.
When most people think of artificial intelligence they might think of a scene from I, Robot or from 2001: A Space Odyssey. They might think of robots that highly resemble humans start a revolution against humanity and suddenly, because of man’s creation, man is no longer the pinnacle of earth’s hierarchy of creatures. For this reason, it might scare people when I say that we already utilize artificial intelligence in every day society. While it might not be robots fighting to win their freedom to live, or a defense system that decides humanity is the greatest threat to the world, artificial intelligence already plays a big role in how business is conducted today.
Many are worried that if a military were to give an intelligent machine, one that can make its own decisions, control over weapons and systems then catastrophe would soon follow. If an AI were to decide at some point that humans were no longer necessary or that conflict was necessary, it would have control over powerful weapons and be able to wreak havoc in human society. The use of AI for hostile or malicious reasons is almost guaranteed to backfire and cause more damage than ever anticipated. The routes could be varied and complex- corporations seeking technological advantage, countries seeking to beat their enemies, or a slow boiled frog kind of evolution leading to enfeeblement and dependency
It is ultimately up to God. Works Cited A.I. Artificial Intelligence. Screenplay by Ian Watson. Prod. Steven Spielberg.
Our minds have created many remarkable things, however the best invention we ever created is the computer. The computer has helped us in many ways by saving time, giving accurate and precise results, also in many other things. but that does not mean that we should rely on the computer to do everything we can work with the computer to help us improve and at the same time improve the computer too. A lot of people believe that robots will behave like humans someday and will be walking on the earth just like us. There should be a limit for everything so that our world would remain peaceful and stable. At the end, we control the computers and they should not control us.
Shyam Sankar, named by CNN as one of the world’s top ten leading speakers, says the key to AI evolvement is the improvement of human-computer symbiosis. Sankar believes humans should be more heavily relied upon in AI and technological evolvement. Sankar’s theory is just one of the many that will encompass the future innovations of AI. The next phase and future of AI is that scientists now want to utilize both human and machine strengths to create a super intelligent thing. From what history has taught us, the unimaginable is possible with determination. Just over fifty years ago, AI was implemented through robots completing a series of demands. Then it progressed to the point that AI can be integrated into society, seen through interactive interfaces like Google Maps or the Siri App. Today, humans have taught machines to effectively take on human jobs, and tasks that have created a more efficient world. The future of AI is up to the creativity and innovation of current society’s scientists, leaders, thinkers, professors, students and