Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Cleopatra's legacy
Cleopatra was the only woman in all classical antiquity to rule independently, known for her charm and irresistible beauty, but also for being a ruthless and passionate leader who seduced Julius Caesar and Mark Antony. Depictions of Cleopatra, ranging from the propaganda of the time period, to portrayals in modern popular culture, as well as in historical written and archaeological sources, have differed for several reasons. The three primary reasons for these differences are gender bias and subjectivity, the social/historical context of the time period and varying political propaganda purposes. As a female, Cleopatra was subject to copious amounts of gender bias from ancient historians. This was due to the large male demographic of historians …show more content…
Cleopatra was depicted differently depending on the setting, views, values, customs and time of each society. Because these aspects are constantly changing and evolving over time, the ways that Cleopatra is shown has also differed due to time periods. A painting by Jean-Leon-Gerome in 1866, depicted Cleopatra as a tall, fair-skinned woman, pushing down one of her slaves. Gerome had visited Egypt in 1856 to gather inspiration for his Orientalist style of painting. The Orientalism movement, which was taking place at the time, meant many artists took an interest in Oriental themes and attempted to represent Middle-eastern and East-Asian cultures from an often Western perspective. Their representation of these societies usually extended from a patronising attitude towards Middle Eastern, Asian and North African cultures and thus, Gerome’s representation of Cleopatra was a reproduction of Oriental themes from a Western perspective, and reflected Western ideals of beauty and regality. His intentions, artistic style and time period meant Cleopatra was portrayed through a Western view, which would vary from other portrayals of her. In the 1963 film ‘Cleopatra’, featuring Elizabeth Taylor as Cleopatra, Fox wanted to express the lavishness and excessive luxury of the Egyptian Queen. This resulted in the film becoming the largest, most expensive film …show more content…
These portrayals of Cleopatra are often unrealistically shown to deliver a specific political message to an audience, and thus, causes a different perception of her. The coins that were made during the time of her rule depicted a masculine, hook-nosed figure, very much in contrast to the ‘beautiful, charming and seductive’ image that is often shown of Cleopatra. It was due to contextual reasons that Cleopatra was shown this way, as these coins were made for the purpose of political propaganda to promote Cleopatra’s rule. A masculine figure would remind the Egyptian civilians of her ruling ancestors, the Ptolemies, and their power and lineage. During these times, a strong nose was a sign of strength in character and power. Compared to the desired looks of the 21st century, ie. ‘babyish’ young good looks, big eyes, small nose, Cleopatra’s portrayal on these coins was very different to our modern ideals of beauty. Moreover, the image of Cleopatra on these coins was not constructed to be a portrayal of her beauty or charm, rather, it was to promote her qualities of strength and power. As a result, Cleopatra’s varying portrayals can be attributed to the inclusion of political propaganda in her depictions. These sources would have varied depending on the political context and viewpoints of different
After the completion of the book, it had let me to believe the book was written for the general audience. Although the author provided many resources, the information was taken from literature that was written during the time. Therefore, some of the quotes were biased either against or favored Cleopatra. For an example of bias against her, the Jewish historian Flavius Josephus called her a “wicked creature, who was a slave to her lusts, but she still imagined that she wanted everything she could think of, and did her utmost to gain it…. As for Antony, he was so entirely overcome by this woman that… he was some way or other bewitched to do whatever she would have him do.” On the contrary, here is an example of bias in favor of Cleopatra: “a princess well versed in the sciences, disposed to the study of philosophy and counting scholars among her intimate friends. She was the author of works on medicine, charms, and other divisions of the natural sciences.” This was taken from a tenth-century Arab historian Al Masudi. The author allowed his readers to conclude their own interpretation of Cleopatra by stating both sides of the story.
...ined in the films Quo Vadis and Cleopatra and is compatible with their messages, while in the process is displayed as a negative thing. The incorporation of sexism and its unfavorable portrayal demonstrates the fault in such beliefs to audiences. However, in contrast, although Plutarch's Life of Antony also implies that women playing into sexist expectations is a bad thing, Plutarch appears to place the blame on women themselves and to encourages certain sexist elements to be maintained. If audiences are able to interpret how sexism plays into the great messages spread by such Ancient Roman films, perhaps audiences can learn to end the persistence of such gender inequalities in society. Perhaps if audiences learn from the directors' messages and recognize the faults in Plutarch's positive view of certain sexist elements, the fall of the misogynist empire can occur.
Egyptian art is infamous across the world - classified by the monumental pyramids, and the Sphinx. Although these are both valid forms of Egyptian art, they do not make up the entire artistic history of the country. On the contrary, perhaps the most replicated example of classic Egyptian art, from the Old Kingdom, can be found in their rendering of the human form. An interest in portraiture developed early in Egypt. (Gardner, 75) Whether painted on pottery, or cut into rock, the figures all had notably Egyptian characteristics. "The seated statue is one of only a very small number of basic formulaic types employed by the sculptors of the Old Kingdom." (Gardner, 75)
The Romans were immensely furious with Cleopatra and had primary influence over what sources were left behind about her. So certainly this is going to lead to biases and inaccuracies in the depictions we have. Furthermore, we are all well aware of how Hollywood likes to dramatize and embellish stories in order to generate ticket sales and is not worried about the accuracy of the historical anecdote. Because of this and her popularity, our knowledge of Cleopatra has been flooded with twisted truths. When examining Cleopatra’s full reign beyond her love affairs, reveals Cleopatra put all of her effort forth in order to solve the conflict between Egypt and Rome and should be recognized for her masterminded and commanding leadership
Stacy Schiff author of Cleopatra strives through her book to denounce all historical myths surrounding Cleopatra. With the rigor of a true historian she is able to distinguish historical veracity from historical myth surrounding the queen from antiquity. The author highlights Cleopatra’s role as a powerful woman and in particular how she attempts to manage the various political or economic predicaments she faced. Stacy Schiff gives us a story that is masterfully reconstructed, allowing the reader insight into the historical context of the time- shedding new light on a woman whose greatest fault was not being a man.
Cleopatra is most often remembered as the lover of two Roman consuls, Julius Caesar and Mark Antony, thereby forever connecting the Egyptian queen to the history of Rome. The stories of her relationships with the two men do not always paint a flattering picture of Cleopatra, as her reported promiscuity and presumption give her a colorful reputation. Cleopatra is also sometimes seen as a misunderstood woman, someone who was never given a fair opportunity to be accepted as the wife of Marc Antony nor the mother of Caesar's child. Some historians and authors use the issue of Cleopatra's race as a reason that she was ostracized from Roman society, saying that the Romans were prejudiced against Egyptians, and despite Cleopatra's Greek background, would never accept her as a suitable mate for a Roman consul. This theory, however, is far outweighed by the numerous justifications the Roman people had for their distaste of Cleoaptra. It is not surprising that Cleopatra never found acceptance in Rome, as she offered nothing to the relationship between Egypt and Rome, she stood for everything they were against, and little by little, she succeeded in destroying parts of the society that the Roman people had worked to build.
Cleopatra’s embodiment, though, does aim for her to become “one of [them.]” Her new body fits in a very specific niche – she does not f...
Figure paintings and sculptures from the thirteenth century BC were all created to appear generally the same with hardly any distinct features. It was not important to the Egyptians to record exactly what the Pharaoh looked like, but to declare their god-like power through their faultless appearance. The early images of royalty
The snake has acted as a diverse symbol throughout history, representing immortality, evil, femininity, and masculinity. In the book Dream Animals, Marilyn Nissenson and Susan Jonas further reveal the awe that the snake has inspired throughout the centuries, "They [snakes] were believed to mediate between life and death, earth and sky, this world and the next" (19). The snake slithers through our subconscious, evoking varying associations. Cleopatra identified with the snake during her life, and it becomes even more highly symbolic in her death. By examining three movies (DeMille's Cleopatra, Mankiewicz's Cleopatra and the ABC version of Cleopatra) and two dramas (Shakespeare's Antony and Cleopatra and Mary Sidney's Tragedy of Antonie) different symbolic representations of the snake emerge along with contrasting depictions of the Queen of the Nile. These varying representations of the asp and slightly contrary portrayals of Cleopatra prove to us that we know very little about the enigmatic ancient Queen.
The Fourth Dynasty was a time of peace in Egyptian history and the transition between pharaohs was believed to be seamless allowing for a great amount of artistic work to be produced (Hawass). It is believed that the temple workshops formulated the cannon for which Egyptian art could be fashioned (Hawass). In statue the pharaoh and the royal family were only depicted based on the strictest of guidelines; “the human figure was usually represented with the head in profile, the eye and shoulders in front view, and the pelvis, legs, and feet in profile (Egyptian Art),” known as the “law of frontality (Egyptian Art).” Like the stature of Khafra from Giza, he was carved with in an unyielding frontal pose. Smooth and perfect, his phys...
"Cleopatra and Egypt - The Coins of Julius Caesar - Australian Centre for Ancient Numismatic Studies." Division of Humanities - Macquarie University. Director, ACANS, n.d. Web. July 2008.
A. A. From Alexander to Cleopatra: The Hellenistic World. New York: Michael Grant Publications Ltd, 1982. Jones, Prudence J. Cleopatra: The Last Pharaoh. London: Haus, 2006.
It is difficult to fully understand the role of women in ancient Egyptian society because the understandings of the society and government are still incomplete. There are also two other major problems, those being that there is very little source material on women, and the material that has been found was biased by the ideas and minds of previous Egyptologists. The only source material that has survived from great kingdoms of Egypt is material that has been either found in tombs on the walls and sarcophaguses, or carved on major government and religious document. None of the writings on papyrus and other delicate materials survived. This material, which has survived, is the writings of the Egyptian literate male elite. In their writings the also did not show any emotions or feelings, this was not the style of the Egyptian people, writings were purely a record keeping device. Because of these limitations, “It is essential to avoid the temptation to extrapolate from the particular to the general, a process which can only too easily introduce error.”
Marjane Satrapi in her memoir, “The Complete Persepolis” enlightens readers with the reality of living in Iran, as she tells her journey through her life of becoming a woman during the Islamic Revolution. Iran similar to other countries has made different prescribed roles for their women and men based on their cultures religious and traditional set of laws. Society to them was a depiction of what their people were expected to look, and act like when in public. When trying to understand the importance of gender along with their roles in society, it’s crucial to acknowledge outside factors, for instance things like culture and social class. The characters throughout her memoir illustrate how their
From the expansion days of Ancient Rome to the fall of the Roman Empire, women have always succumbed to living subjacent to the status of their omnipotent and dominant male figures. After leaving her childhood home and the rule of her father, a young Roman girl would then be coerced into the dominion of her husband, often taking a plethora of roles, ranging from lover, caretaker, and best friend. It is often lightheartedly stated that, “Behind every great man is an even greater woman,” and William Shakespeare exemplifies this concept beautifully in Julius Caesar, in which he effectively used the spouses of the two main characters to add more depth, drama, and literary elements to the play, bringing it to life. Although the only two female characters in Julius Caesar, Portia and Calpurnia do not play a pivotal role in the overall plot of the story, their presence is vital in illuminating and developing the characters of their husbands, Brutus and Caesar. What they reveal about their husbands leads the reader to infer that Portia is the more admirable and redeeming character.