China In Transition Analysis

1984 Words4 Pages

China in Transition: Political and Social Change through Economic Development In attempting to explain the multitude of factors that require or produce political and social change within the context of economic development, and specifically applying them to China, it becomes exceptionally difficult not to commit the non causa pro causa variety of the fallacy of false cause in which something is not really the cause at all, and the mistake is based on something other than mere temporal succession. In the case of China, the cause of a robust economy might not match, or even be synonymous with, the causes of political and social change; especially since the effects have not yet reached their full potential. However, there is some contrasts …show more content…

Pan tells how Zhiqiang had benefited from the political that that occurred after the Cultural Revolution, and begin to read many books that had been previously banned. Through this exploration, Zhiqiang found himself questioning much of the indoctrinated beliefs he had been taught in school (Pan 272). Again, Pan alludes to the Tiananmen square protests of 1989, and uses these as a starting point for how these events turned Zhiqiang's life around (Pan 274). The outcome of the trial, which was never decided, is less important in the context of the story that Pan weaves. The important aspect taken away from the reading is that it was not necessarily the economy in and of itself that forced a change politically or socially. It was more evident that it was the will of the people, and the government's response to the people's demands that were the important context. The trial was able to show that party leaders could be held accountable under the law (Pan …show more content…

In lecture, we were having one of the peer led session, and were discussing the Cultural Revolution, Zheng Zhong, and specifically the SARS epidemic. The female foreign exchange student, whose name I do not know, appeared to take offense to the exposition of the Chinese government’s failure in handling the epidemic. The question was, in light of the government's failure to react properly to the SARS epidemic, do you think that this could happen again? Her response was that the SARS epidemic was an anomaly and somewhat trivial. She was basically saying that this was the only epidemic that ever happened in China, and would probably not happen again. The reason I found this somewhat troubling was that it totally dismissed any earlier discussion about the massive famines, and starvation that happened during the Cultural Revolution. In addition, it completely discounted the sterilization of people without their consent as an epidemic. To put in context, and to specifically state what I put in my notes, this was my response: Famine and starvation, I guess is not an epidemic. What about sterilization of the population... I guess not an epidemic

Open Document