Analysis Of Protect Children From Targeted Advertising

716 Words2 Pages

After much thought process and careful consideration, I agree with the writer/ creator of the Self-reuglation and Eduction- Not Legislation essay. Although the writer of Protect Children from Targeted Advertising made many great key points and esstential factors, essay #2 had better arguements and representations. Protect Children from Targeted Advertising stated one good postive fact about ads that I feel esstential for our economy to continue to grow and suceed. In paragragh one Protect Children from Targeted Adversting states the follwoing; "American businesses are vital to a successful economy. So, they are allowed to advertise to the young as well as the old. In fact, businesses spend around twelve billion dollars each year on ads directed at children." This statement shows the without ads we wouldn 't have a succesful economy. Ads help persuade many indivuals to not only buy their products and help our economy grow fincially but also can persuade many chidren to do greats things. Protect Children from Targeted Advertising also states in paragraph two; "Advertisers make big impressions on little minds. The Amerian Psychological Association (APA) reports that children younger than eight years do not understand that ads are designed to persuade. But kids remember the ads extremly well, and they see thousands each year. Making them easy prey. Children being easy prey
"For example, one major resturant chain invested more that forty million dollars promoting its healthy choices directly to children." (paragraph two). This advertisment was postively promoting kids to eat more healthy rather than eat junk

Open Document