Character Analysis Of Fruitvale Station

1119 Words3 Pages

Fruitvale Station tells a story all too well known in the United States of America, a young black man growing up in an impoverished community is murdered by a cop, while unarmed. The story of Oscar Grant, the young man gunned down by a BART (Bay Area Rapid Transit) officer on a subway platform in his hometown of Oakland, California drew national attention when the incident occurred on the first of January 2009. Later this tragedy was made into a movie of the late Oscar Grant’s life and death as portrayed by Michael B. Jordan. The film takes place on Oscar Grant’s final day and gives a portrait of the man he was. Oscar Grant was in many ways a product of his environment, he had previous struggles with law enforcement, he had little money, …show more content…

He, however never seemed satisfied with any of this, he did not want to remain poor, he wanted to work and he pleaded with his boss to rehire him to the grocery store in which he had just been fired from. Grant felt a desire and need to support his wife and his young girl. By all accounts he was a loving man, someone who seemed to care deeply about those around him, but like many poor black men in America, he faced a harsh reality, one of unemployment, economic insecurity, fear of crime, and previous run ins with the law. Many may be quick to judge his character for being an immoral or deviant person, but with the given context, it is clear Grant never wanted to sell drugs as he had in his youth and almost fell back into in his final days, he simply wanted to support for his wife and daughter, to make sure they had food on the table. This did not make Grant happy at all, ultimately he decided against falling back into a life of selling drugs on the street and would look for a better way to provide for his family. This struggle is not unique, in places like Oakland’s impoverished neighborhoods, there is little investment in the communities and few jobs, also a poor education system. Good people, like …show more content…

The officer in this case used not only physically force, but verbal intimidation, referring to Grant as the “N word” in many ways this appeared to give him a dominating position against Grant in which he could not do anything to physically or verbally defend himself. In a sense before the shots were fired he was dehumanized made into something less than a man. In the cops eyes he was not a man, he was a thug a criminal and the “N word” he was not worthy of life. This mindset is one deeply rooted in the structure of the United States. It allows for police officers to abuse, harass, and even kill black people and not face any repercussions. The ideology that a cop is inherently in the right and a black person is inherently in the wrong, allowed for the killing of Oscar Grant and the killings of many black men to go unabated. There is a sense of fear of black men in America, allowing for them to be stereotyped into being criminal. Oscar Grant was never innocent in the eyes of Officer Caruso, he was guilty and he never even had a chance to be proven innocent. This incident was in many ways a microcosm for the black experience with law enforcement in America. The rules of the constitution do not effectively apply to black Americans as if it is acceptable for an individual, like Oscar Grant to be hit, to be silenced, and to be killed and

Open Document