Catholic Death Penalty

1691 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Secular views on death penalty

One of the things Catholics feel strongly about is the sanctity of life. From the womb to the tomb, Catholics believe that all life is sacred, and thus, should not be taken by human hands under any circumstances. From abortion to murder to the death penalty, all are viewed as cruel, due to the fact that it is ending a human’s life. Catholics believe that the only one able to decide whether a life should be taken is God, therefore, no human has the right to kill another human, no matter the circumstances. This stand on the treatment of human life is agreed on by many people; however, when it comes to the death penalty, also known as capital punishment, some of those voices that agreed before, now seem to be at odds. The Catholic belief still …show more content…

This is saying that when given the option, one should use the option that does not put any life at risk. When it comes to the death penalty, we have another option to punish those who commit such heinous crimes, and that other option is life in jail. Therefore, we should take the choice that “conforms with the dignity of the human person,” which in this case, would be life in …show more content…

As in there is no other alternative to protect the people, there is no way to defend the innocent from a “grave threat to human life” and keep the criminals right to life intact. Only under those circumstances, should capital punishment be used, for if there is another option that protects all human life, regardless of what it is, then we must always use that option. The United States Conference of Catholic Bishops says, “In Catholic teaching the state has the recourse to impose the death penalty upon criminals convicted of heinous crimes if this ultimate sanction is the only available means to protect society from a grave threat to human life. However, this right should not be exercised when other ways are available to punish criminals and to protect society that are more respectful of human life.” Under no circumstances should we take another human life unless it is the only option to protect all of the other human life. The death penalty is a dire resolution but if the lives of many others are at stake, then the people must choose the option that better protects human life, but only in those very few situations where there is no better alternative to protect the lives of

Show More
Related

  • Capital Punishment: A Failed Experiment By David Von Drehle

    1002 Words  | 3 Pages

    The death penalty has always been a subject of controversy. Some say that it is a barbaric practice that should be done away with while others claim it to be necessary to ensure the safety of modern society. Either way, capital punishment has always remained a grey area in the

    Read More

  • Capital Punishment Is Morally Acceptable

    1336 Words  | 3 Pages

    Above all else, capital punishment should be morally justified in extreme situations because it will have a deterrent effect. Many criminals seem to be threatened more by the thought of death rather than a long-term prison sentence. If a criminal is sentenced to twenty-five years in prison then he/she knows that all the necessities needed to survive for those twenty-five years, including food, water, shelter, and even a possible chance of release will be pro...

    Read More

  • Capital Punishment Essay - True Justice Through Application of the Death Penalty

    1070 Words  | 3 Pages

    The death penalty, as administered by states based on their individual laws, is considered capital punishment, the purpose of which is to penalize criminals convicted of murder or other heinous crimes (Fabian).  The death penalty issue has been the focus of much controversy in recent years, even though capital punishment has been a part of our country's history since the beginning.  Crimes in colonial times, such as murder and theft of livestock were dealt with swiftly and decisively ("The Death Penalty...").  Criminals were hanged shortly after their trial, in public executions. This practice was then considered just punishment for those crimes.  Recently though, the focus of the death penalty debate has been on moral and legal issues.  The murderers of today's society can be assured of a much longer life even after conviction, with the constraints of the appeals process slowing the implementation of their death sentence.  In most cases, the appeal process lasts several years, during which time criminals enjoy comfortable lives.  They have television, gym facilities, and the leisure time to attend free college-level classes that most American citizens must struggle to afford.  Foremost, these murderers have the luxury of time, something their victims ran out of the moment their paths crossed.  It is time this country realized the only true justice for these criminals is in the form of the death penalty.  The death penalty should be administered for particularly heinous crimes.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Capital Punishment

    1008 Words  | 3 Pages

    There are over sixty offenses in the United States of America that can be punishable by receiving the death penalty (What is..., 1). However, many individuals believe that the death penalty is an inadequate source of punishment for any crime no matter how severe it is. The fact remains, however, that the death penalty is one of the most ideal forms of punishment. There are other individuals who agree with the idea that capital punishment is the best form of punishment. In fact, some of these individuals believe that this should be the only form of punishment.

    Read More

  • Fahrenheit 451 Week 3

    1088 Words  | 3 Pages

    From the time the first colonists arrived in the late Sixteen Hundreds Pennsylvania executions were carried out by public hanging (Cor.state.pa.us, 2014). In Eighteen Forty Three, Pennsylvania became the first state to abolish public hangings. From Eighteen Thirty Four until Nineteen Fifty Three each county was responsible for carrying out private hanging of criminal within the wall of the county jail.

    Read More

  • The Controversy of Death Penalty in the US

    1313 Words  | 3 Pages

    The death penalty, ever since it was established, has created a huge controversy all throughout the world. Ever since the death penalty was created, there have been people who supported the death penalty and those who wanted to destroy it. When the death penalty was first created the methods that were used were gruesome and painful, it goes against the Eighth Amendment that was put in place many years later. The methods they used were focused on torturing the people and putting them through as much pain as possible. In today’s society the death penalty is quick and painless, it follows the Eighth Amendment. Still there are many people who are against capital punishment. The line of whether to kill a man or women for murder or to let him or her spend the rest one’s life in prison forever will never be drawn in a staight.

    Read More

  • Euthanasia, Abortion and the Church

    1136 Words  | 3 Pages

    Euthanasia, Abortion and the Church The Catholic Church has consistently taught that respect for human life is one of the most essential aspects of our faith. Life includes love, respect, community, and family. Each person is entitled their right to life, a responsibility to God, to live out their life from natural birth to natural death. Unfortunately, there have been horrifying incidents where people commit murders, assault and manipulate other people. One of the Ten Commandments clearly states

    Read More

  • The Death Penalty:Social Ethics: Morality and Social Policy

    1734 Words  | 4 Pages

    It is morally justified to kill criminals who have lost their right to life and whom we have a right to kill.

    Read More

  • The Catholic View of Euthanasia

    845 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Catholic view of euthanasia is that euthanasia is morally wrong. it has always been taught the importance of the commandment "you shall not kill". The church has said that "nothing and no one can in any way permit the killing of an innocent person, whether a foetus or an embryo, an infant or an adult, an old person, or one suffering from an incurable disease. disease, or a person who is dying. " The church says any law permitting euthanasia is unjust.

    Read More

  • Free Death Penalty Essays: Religious Perspectives of Capital Punishment

    686 Words  | 2 Pages

    Travelling around the world, this paper presents the various religious perspectives evidenced in recent actions taken regarding the death penalty.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of The Death Penalty

    580 Words  | 2 Pages

    “The death penalty is popular among politicians and the public in response to the escalating fear of violence. However, capital punishment actually makes the fight against crime more difficult. Executions waste valuable resources that could be applied to more promising efforts to protect the public. Additionally, innocent people are sometimes executed and the brutalizing effect executions have on society may result in more murders. For these reasons, the death penalty should be opposed.” (Morgenthau 14)

    Read More

  • Religion and the Death Penalty

    2352 Words  | 5 Pages

    The death penalty or some prefer to call it capital punishment has been around since 1608. During the foundation of our country there were twelve death – eligible crimes of the Massachusetts Bay Colony and they were as follows: idolatry, witchcraft, blasphemy, murder, manslaughter, poisoning, bestiality, sodomy, adultery, man stealing , false witness in capital cases and conspiracy & rebellion. While some are absolutely for it and some are absolutely against it there is one factor that comes into play on both sides of the argument and that factor is religion. Many people will state that there is or should be a line between church and state however religion has and will always play a major role in ones conceptual thinking as to what is right and as to what is wrong what is moral and what is immoral. Despite the fact that people would rather think or rationalize without involving religion is nearly impossible. “By virtually any definition, religion involves a central concern with making sense of life and death. The American legal system, rooted in Judeo-Christian ethics, routinely confronts issues that test our basic assumptions about the meaning and sanctity of life and about the role of the State in shaping and sustaining such meanings” (Young,1992).

    Read More

  • Death And Dying In Roman Catholicism

    653 Words  | 2 Pages

    Roman Catholicism’s views regarding life, and by extension death and dying, differ and oftentimes clash with secular views around death and dying. The sanctity of human life is a major tenet in Roman Catholicism where life is the most precious gift from God and the most fundamental of all goods. As God’s creation, man

    Read More

  • Capital Punishment Australia

    1073 Words  | 3 Pages

    Christians against the death penalty argue that only God should create and destroy life, and that there should be no exceptions to “thou shalt not kill”. They also uphold the fundamental Christian teachings of forgiveness, compassion, and support for preserving life. The Catholic Church allowed the death penalty for centuries. The Catholic stance began to change under Pope John Paul II’s papacy from 1978 to 2005 (The Guardian, 2015).

    Read More

  • Death Penalty Position Paper

    924 Words  | 2 Pages

    “An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth” is how the saying goes. Coined by the infamous Hammurabi’s Code around 1700 BC, this ancient expression has become the basis of a great political debate over the past several decades – the death penalty. While the conflict can be whittled down to a matter of morals, a more pragmatic approach shows defendable points that are far more evidence backed. Supporters of the death penalty advocate that it deters crime, provides closure, and is a just punishment for those who choose to take a human life. Those against the death penalty argue that execution is a betrayal of basic human rights, an ineffective crime deterrent, an economically wasteful option, and an outdated method. The debate has experienced varying levels of attention over the years, but has always kept in the eye of the public. While many still advocate for the continued use of capital punishment, the process is not the most cost effective, efficient, consistent, or up-to-date means of punishment that America could be using today.

    Read More

More about Catholic Death Penalty

Open Document