Cash For Grades

1533 Words4 Pages

Over the past decade or so many cash for grades programs are popping up all over the United States. Despite the title, these programs are not ways for students to pay other people to do their school work for them. Instead the programs are incentive ways to increase A+ work in students by motivating them with the promise of a reward. Cash for grades programs can help students develop proper school etiquette such as: attending all classes, exhibiting good behavior, completing all assignments, and studying for tests and actually doing well on them. Even though the programs seem to produce model A students once they graduate, cash for grades programs can have negative impacts on students during their high school careers and even after graduation. …show more content…

What were their reasons behind this sudden interest in accelerated learning? Was it the money? These are all questions that should strike the mind of those who are considering beginning a cash for grades program. Higher educators must think about what type of school they want to be a part of. Cash for grades programs show that “too much emphasis is put on efficiency and not enough on the quality of education” (“Cash for Grades” con). In the article, “Cash for Grades,” a study was done involving children; some children were told that they would receive a reward for drawing pictures and others would receive nothing. At the conclusion of the study, it was discovered that the children offered rewards “were less likely to draw than those who were not” (“Cash for Grades”). It was inferred that the pattern would resemble similarly in adults and “offering rewards actually discourages people from becoming passionate about the activities the pursue” (Cash for Grades”). Taking the information and applying it to students will produce a similar outcome. Paying students to do their homework and get good grades will cause them to enjoy these activities even less and will decrease their desire to participate in …show more content…

The programs can teach children to work hard for money or work hard for success. In Chicago, Roland Fryer developed a program that helped 3,750 high school freshman in 20 schools. The CEO, Arne Duncan, had a fear that there would be a high rate of students who would drop out in ninth or 10th grade. Fryer’s program stated that at the end of every 5 week grading period, students had the chance of earning $50 for every A, $35 for every B, and $20 for every C in English, math, science, social studies, and physical education. Duncan had found a way to “keep high school students in the classroom” while working to improve the curriculum that they learned (“Cash for

Open Document