This is not fair because the students are not gaining knowledge. People for tenure argue that this is okay because the teacher has held the position for so long. In reality, this is not acceptable because it is severely damaging the stu... ... middle of paper ... ...d with teachers who do would ensure that students are learning. Due to the protection of inefficient teachers, costly firing process, and detriment for students, the tenure should be reformed. Teachers who are doing a poor job of teaching are not getting fired, causing students to fail.
These are not measures of learning outcomes, but rather completely unrelated (“Grading vs. Assessment…”). Sometimes if a student does not do well on an assignment, then the teacher might skew or pad the results of the students work which leads to an inaccurate picture of a student’s learning. A report by the Huffington Post states that “Teachers feel compelled to ‘grade,’ any and all student work, believing that a letter or percentage will indicate to students and parents a measure of skill.” (Rubino). This quote indicates that some teachers feel that they must grade all work that is handed out. Some of the work handed out should not need to be graded.
These requirements causing a loss in the actual want to learn is another unintended consequence in our current educational system. Again, grading causing discouragement and a lack of learning and the curriculum causing students to waste time in unnecessary courses are a few of the negative unintended consequences of today’s educational system. Ultimately, leaning should not just be taking required courses, passing with “A’s” with no information sticking. It should be about actually learning, there doesn’t have to be a reason behind learning. “Education should be only life itself.
If the teachers received the results they hoped for they would reward us with a treat of some sort. If the teachers did not see the results they wanted, we expected a lecture on how badly we performed, and that it cannot happen again and it will not be tolerated. I believe surprise visits would fix these issues, because a teacher would not be able to prepare to change how they teach. It would also give principals a taste as to whether it is a teacher’s lack of teaching skills, or is the student not putting any effort into the work, or that the students have behavioral problems, and that is why the students earned a poor grade.
Motivation can be easily misunderstood from wanting to graduate and not finding your strength and weaknesses throughout the schooling. When a student doesn’t understand a lesson most say ill look it up later or that won’t affect me on the test. But in reality every fact helps with the overall understanding and the purpose of the lessons. Some don’t like high school or lower grades because they are taught subjects that don’t interest them. They additionally think if no one, not even the teacher, is putting in the effort for them to succeed than they shouldn’t either.
It is wrong to blame the students at fault. Every student aims for good grades so they do everything they can to get it. It is true that the way students get their good grades might be a bit sneaky and inappropriate, but saying students do not put effort into their ... ... middle of paper ... ...are expected to do well in their GE classes to meet the standard. As a result, students are scared that they cannot maintain their grades so they have to cheat to meet the requirements to get in their major. People tend to blame students for being lazy and do not take school seriously.
Although receiving good grades is important, cheating is not the right way to do so. Students who cheat are hurting their futures in a post-secondary education and for their career. Cheating causes the student to lose critical thinking ability, honesty, self-image and integrity, self-confidence and respect, and reputation. Without critical thinking a student will have a hard time distinguishing clear, reasonable judgements. In order to move on and expand ones education, a student must first clearly understand the basic concepts of a topic.
When it comes to schoolwork, they will not take the time to help their friend with the course material because they fear their friend will score better than them. People will not help others if it does not benefit them in anyway. Therefore, I support Rubin’s argument about how competition brings out the worst in people, and that competition does not provide happiness.
They should not be used in the classroom because there are many depressing controversies. It could end the student’s interest in that certain subject and hinder him or her from trying new things. Also,the chance of that rewarded behavior happening in all of the classrooms is pretty slim. Despite the fact that there are positive effects with awards, the negative effects are more prominent. The attitude of students is the most important element in their lives.
Has this truly benefited the students as much as we think it does? The answer to both questions is no. It takes away a child’s natural desire to learn, it doesn’t work out in the long run, and it ruins teacher-student relationships. Paying students for high grades is a terrible idea because it takes away a child’s intrinsic motivation, creates conflict between students and teachers, and doesn’t work out in