Case Study Of Yvette Wratten Case

140 Words1 Page

They can dismissal the employee if it not related to pregnancy. The company must provide justification about why she was dismissed. In Yvette Wratten case, her boss when he fired her. That mean it was not justification truthful or reliable. The boss should show her report to the court to prove that she was deserve to dismissed from the job. But he did not show the exactly report to the court it was only just speak without any proof. The boss should be taking action necessary before be knowing of her pregnancy, to show it was not the reason of her dismissed from work. But he did the opposite. He did not have any sufficient and convincing evidence. The Canadian law for human rights prevent discrimination related to pregnancy. Refusal to work,

Open Document