Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Nature vs nurture in criminal mind
Nature vs nurture in criminal behavior
Nature vs nurture in criminal mind
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Nature vs nurture in criminal mind
Synthesizing: The Psychopath and Can Psychopath Be Cured “To the best of our knowledge, there is no cure for psychopathy. No pill can instill empathy, no vaccine can prevent murder in cold blood, and no amount talk therapy can change an uncaring mind (article; page 1)”. It’s hard to cure a psychopath, the way you grew up can have an effect on that and the way you were born. You can bring a psychopath to a therapy session everyday, and a psychopath wouldn't be able to act normal. For all intents and purposes, Psychopaths are lost to the normal social world. But this didn’t stop all scientist and journalist to stop researching about psychopaths. For example in the book; The Psychopath Test from Jon Ronson. Ronson was given a task to find who …show more content…
Being called a psychopath is harsh because of how the society will react or people don’t want to believe they are psychopaths. For example in the article “The Neuroscientist Who Discovered he was a Psychopath”, James had said “Many of us would hide this discovery and never tell a soul, out of fear or embarrassment of being labeled a psychopath”. In the book The Psychopath Test, when Ronson was doing a interview on page 5 he was scared for being sued because he called a man a psychopath. Ronson and Fallon both agreed that being called a psychopath is a big thing because if you were to be called a psychopath, the society will look at you weird. I think that the society now is very judgemental about how people dress or how people act. What I think about being called a psychopath is a big thing because some people don’t really know what happened during their childhood. On the other hand I would rather be called a psychopath than crazy because in my mind, I think psychopath had so many meaning and it's a bigger word. Rather than crazy, it just means one …show more content…
In the Article, it talk about how the “fact that a person with the genes and brain of a psychopath could end up a non-violent, stable and successful scientist made Fallon reconsider the ambiguity of the term (article; page 1)”. In the book, Ronson talked about Tony. The book explained how Tony was at going to a bar and saw a homeless guy. He decided to kick and beat up the guy but didn’t plan to kill him. Not all people that are called a psychopath is a murder because there are many psychopaths out there; one of them is born naturally with that disorder and the other one is someone that did something harsh or committed a
Identifying the mystery of the psychopath can prove to help the them and the general public. Early awareness of the common psychopaths among us will reduce the impact on society. Further research is still needed to better help the psychopath and the general population.
Psychopaths are strict when committing a crime. They plan there crime before they do it. Because they think there crimes through, they are hardly found about. In the article, “Psychopath vs sociopath” it says “tendency to participate in schemes and take calculated risks to minimize evidence or exposure.” People portray them to be very violent people but it is rare for them to do violent crimes. They tend to do smaller crimes but they can be serial killers. As they feel no guilt when doing the crime, although, when they do a big crime they can be undetected for a long
The statement “ the psychopaths is not mentally ill” made me realize that I didn’t truly understand what it meant to be mentally ill was, however I thought that a good starting place would be to firstly understand what it meant to be “healthy”. The first place I looked at was what it meant to be ‘mentally healthy’. according to the United States Centres for Disease Control and Prevention, being mentally ‘healthy’ is a “state of well-being in which the individual realizes his or her own abilities, can cope with the normal stresses of life, can work productively and fruitfully” producing an interesting idea that being ‘healthy’ implying a deep connection with firstly acting sociable and secondly rationally. Mental illness on the other hand was as expected, the complete opposite to being ‘healthy’. It is described to be “health conditions that are characterized by alterations in thinking, mood, or behaviour (or some combination thereof) associated with distress and/or impaired functioning” inferring that to be mentally unwell is to gain an issue with you mind that causes changes to you personality relative to how you were perceived while ‘healthy’, therefore causing changes in your rational and also you sociability, the information also dictated that mental illness are a developing factor, that derive from social or environmental stressor at any time and to anyone.
The responsibility of psychopaths is a highly debated topic in the legal, philosophical, and neuroscientific fields. In the US, a person is responsible if they “have sufficient rational capacity” and “they are not acting under coercion” (Glenn & Raine 2014). The majority of the academic community believes that psychopaths’ responsibility is mitigated because of the profound cognitive and emotional deficits that lead to a reduced rational capacity. However, the public’s instinct is to hold psychopaths responsible for their crimes. What is it that gives us this instinctive reaction?
There have been many studies on what behaviors constitute psychopathy. Various Studies have shown that an individual’s behavior must include actions such as hostility to animals or people, ruin to possessions, dishonesty or larceny, and grave violations of rules, as well as a clinically defined impairment of an individual’s social, educational, or employment-related purposes. In order for an individual to be found to be presenting such a disorder, he or she must present with a minimum of at least one of the previous mention behaviors in the past six months, or three plus in a twelve-month timeframe (Mueller III, 2012). Individuals present with psychopathic propensity or psychopathy have a tendency to have a decreased aptitude to name apprehensive facial expressions and a frightened vocal change. An out of...
Psychopaths literally feel nothing when it comes to violence or fear. Levy studies show that the emotional sectors of the brain are damaged. This makes them dangerous. They can not see that something is hurting or they are hurting someone.
People believe that you are born as a psychopath or a sociopath and that you cannot develop those necessary traits. While psychopaths and sociopaths believe that the time they were ‘born’, or suddenly felt as though they knew who they were supposed to be, is the time that they suddenly had "control of reactive aggression and [had] “acquired sociopathy”"(Blair) and psychopathy is the actual time they were born in life, that just is not the case. Over time, with an “impaired mind or traumatic, life changing event” (Blair), and even some genetic factors at times, one can ‘become’ a psychopath or sociopath. Gradually, “your neighbors, your colleagues, maybe even family members and loved ones"(Headlee) can acquire the traits necessary to be considered a psychopath or sociopath. However, doctors are very careful when using the terms psychopath and sociopath. When using the terms psychopath and sociopath, the patients, or relatives of the patients, immediately assume the worst; which is, the person is a killer. While there is no cure for these conditions, it is possible to lose some of the more common traits of psychopathy and sociopathy later in life. Which brings me to my next piece of
One area of research in psychopathy focuses on the set of structures in the brain known as the limbic system, but more specifically on a structure known as the amygdala. According to neuropsychology class slides, the amygdala is involved in emotions and storage of emotions in memory as well as the fear response when encountering threatening environmental stimuli. Osumi and colleagues (2012) note that the affective and interpersonal facets of psychopathy, such as cold-heartedness and lack of empathy, which are thought to be the core features of psychopathy, are associated with reduced activity in the amygdala. This is coupled with the fact that a less functional amygdala is associated with a psychopathic individual’s exhibition of antisocial behaviors, at least in part because he will not perceive the threat of punishment as a consequence of his actions. So whether it be the acts against other people or the acts of justice that may be carried out against the perpetrator, the psychopath will perceive both as less significant, as compared to a non-psychopathic individual. (Osumi et al., 2012)
Are psychopaths like Alice, “mad or bad?” (page 21). The question whether psychopaths are mentally ill or just a bad seed has caused much debate. Dr. Hare explains that the problem is not only labeling them mad or bad, but who deals with them. “Does the treatment or control of the psychopath rightly fall to mental health professionals or to the correctional system?” (page 21). Not only are professionals confused on how to classify psychopaths, but the media also creates confusion. Psychopath means mental illness and the media uses the word to classify someone as, “insane or crazy”, (page 22). Dr. Hare explains that even though psychopaths, “cannot be understood in terms of traditional views of mental illness”, they, “are not disoriented or out of touch with reality, nor do they experience the delusions, hallucinations, or intense subjective distress that characterize most other mental disorders…psychopaths are rational and aware of what they are doing and why.” (page 22). Most professionals use the term psychopath and sociopath as one in the same. Since DSM-III, antisocial personality disorder has been used in place of psychopath and sociopath. Philippe Pinel was the first psychiatrist describe a psychopath and Harvey Cleckley was one of the first successful publish a book describing a psychopath to the general public . Pinel used the term, “insanity without delirium”, (page 25). Cleckley wrote The Mask of Sanity, which influenced researchers in North America. Dr. Robert Hare explained that WWII was the first time clinicians felt a need to diagnosis people with psychopathy. Due to the draft, there was a need to weed out the people could disrupt or harm the military structure. Dr. Robert Hare realized how hard it was to identify a true psychopaths from rule breakers and developed the Psychopathy Checklist. This checklist is used world wide to help clinicians identify true
“Without Conscience" by Robert D. Hare is one aimed towards making the general public aware of the many psychopaths that inhabit the world we live in. Throughout the book Hare exposes the reader to a number of short stories; all with an emphasis on a characteristic of psychopaths. Hare makes the claim that close monitoring of psychopathy are vital if we ever hope to gain a hold over Psychopathy- A disorder that affects not only the individual but also society itself. He also indicates one of the reasons for this book is order to correctly treat these individuals we have to be able to correctly identify who meets the criteria. His ultimate goal with the text is to alleviate some of the confusion in the increase in criminal activity by determining how my of this is a result of Psychopathy.
Scientists have many theories concerning psychopaths. Scientists do not have a definite clear cut answer on what is the cause of psychopathy but they have many ideas: nature and the nurture of the person. Nature is the gene that the person carries. The nurture of the person when they were a child simply means how they were treated when they were growing up and/or how they were raised. Some scientists even consider it a possibility that it could be a mixture of the two.
When Ronson wraps up his work in The Psychopath Test, a novel, he creates a theme of paranoia as he ventured into an industry of madness. He establishes his work’s meaning that any individual may appear normal, abnormal, or be a psychopath within. In other words, his theme follows the idea that life can be full of deceiving people. In order to convey his theme, he used four significant characters. They include himself as the narrator, David Shayler with Rachel North, and Robert Hare. These characters not only emphasize Ronson’s theme, but also help establish the purpose of his theme, which is to showcase that madness can be anywhere.
The media most often showcases psychopaths as individuals who are inherently evil and dangerous towards themselves and others. Yet, this concept of psychopathy goes far beyond this idea of pure evil and instead necessitates a needed psychological understanding. These individuals, psychopaths, are generally characterized by a lack of empathy and conscience. Indeed, psychopath’s indifference to the repercussions of their actions combined with other characteristics such as hostility and aggression make for a potentially dangerous personality (Lyken, 1996, p.30). In order to identify a psychopath’s recidivism, it is important to differentiate them from sociopaths who, instead of having a psychological impairment that makes it difficult for them to socialize, have been systematically under socialized (Lyken, 1996, p.30). In accordance. psychologists have developed the methods such as the Psychopathy Checklist- Revised (PCL-R) to help identify those with psychopathic tendencies (Walters, 2012, p.409). That is why predictions of recidivism among psychopaths is most efficient when done
Depictions of psychopaths today have become exaggerated based off of what you see in movies and films. The psychopaths in movies are believed to be dangerous or have an anti-social personality disorder. Not all psychopaths can be defined in that manner. Psychopaths are identified as people who are emotionally unstable. They are ultimately suffering from a chronic mental disorder with abnormal or violent social behavior. There have been studies ultimately wondering if a psychopath is born, or is it raised? Genetics and environment combine to produce conditions that create psychopathology. By paying attention to environmental variables we can potentially reduce the amount of people who become dangerous psychopaths.
Shock treatments do not work and drugs have not proven to be successful in treatment or psychotherapy, which requires trust and a relationship with the therapist, is defiantly not going to happen. A psychopathic serial killer is incapable of feeling emotion and opening up to others, they don’t want to change. Five percent of people associated with psychopathic tendency also have a personality disorder as well. (What We Need To Know About Psychopaths)