Campaign Rhetorical Analysis

539 Words2 Pages

Dear Independant Candidate Leyla Munden, There are many ways to advertise a campaign but I have ideas that could be the smartest and most ethical way. While most candidates focus on distracting voters from their negative aspects and bashing their opponents, I think it would be most informative, effective, and ethical to focus primarily on stacking the deck. The best way to spend money for your campaign is with $600,000 on stacking the deck, $300,000 on testimonials, and $100,000 on glittering generalities. I would like to spend the most money on stacking the deck because it is the best way to get your information out there and to let the voters know exactly what ideals they are voting for. For example, in Reagan’s Prouder, Stronger, Better TV ad, the narrator lists off all of Reagan’s …show more content…

No matter what group or person support you, voters are easily influenced by those they look up to. If Beyonce supports you, that could land you the minority vote, for example. In 2012, Walter Mondale ran his campaign primarily on testimonials from various groups (Document A). It shows his most important groups, Retirees, United Paperworkers International Union, and Asian Americans. It is also very ethical because it causes no harm to anyone else while still having the ability to move himself up in the election. Therefore, I think it should be one of your most important strategies. Glittering generalities should get $100,000 of your campaign money. Giving a simple catchphrase to your campaign will give voters a connotation between said positive phrase and you. This is also a good thing to put on apparel which is good for a campaign because it rallies voters together and gives them a sense of unity. During Obama’s campaign, millions of people over the nation wore his “hope” shirts (Document E). This gave them a rallying uniform and brought them together to fight for what they desired. I think this could be very beneficial to your

Open Document