British Expansion 1750-1850

894 Words2 Pages

The relationship between British expansion in the period 1750-1850 and the industrialisation that took place there at this time can be taken in a variety of ways. In this period expansion sky rocketed1 compared to previous years and it has to be explored to understand if the reason for this was because of the Industrial revolution or if not wholly responsible, the part that it played. This essay will look at these varying views on the relationship and look at how they can often be interconnected. One of the ways that the relationship between the expansion of the British Empire and Britain’s industrialisation can be looked at is through the idea that the Empire was fuelled by industrialisation. At its height, the British Empire ruled one fifth …show more content…

If 1750 is taken as the starting point of the industrial revolution in Britain, then it can be seen that the expansion of British territory is largely due to the need for raw materials to keep up with a faster pace of production than was previously held due to the new technology brought forth by the Industrial revolution. This expansion can also be seen to be Britain expanding their trade network to be able to profit from the excess that was now being produced with machinery as opposed to hand labourers. Many Marxist historians take this view that imperialism and expansion was due to the economic repercussions of empire building, However if Cain and Hopkins article in the Economic History Review from 1980 is taken into account, this idea is then somewhat put down. In it they explain how although related to expansion it is not the primary reason for it, and due to a lack of research in areas that are not Eurocentric, the 'exploding metropole'2 theory given by many is somewhat …show more content…

Both J.H. Clapham and Arthur Redford use this fact in two of their articles to argue the point that the changes in British manufacturing “were far less revolutionary than first supposed”4 , a similar feeling can be found the Cain and Hopkins article mentioned earlier, in so much as that they recognise that agriculture was still as huge part of the British economic landscape as it still 'generated a substantial part of national income'5. So if the Empire was not fuelled by industrialisation, the relationship between the two factors can be seen as reversing and as the British Empire being the reason for mass industrialisation taking place in Britain. This view of the relationship is most easily seen by using China as a case study. Whilst Britain still remained in the depths of the feudal system and farming dominated the lives of the masses, 11th century China possessed the ability to produce 125,000 of pig ironi, smelt iron and had power-driven spinning machines, and yet the industrial revolution did not take place in China in the

Open Document