Britain During The Golden Age Essay

498 Words1 Page

While Britain had positive GDP growth during the Golden Age, it didn’t achieve quite the same impressive growth rates that its neighbours in Europe did, due to investment growing faster that productivity, which was partially caused by having lower social investment levels, and there being less opportunity for catch-up growth in Britain. One reason that Britain didn’t grow as quickly as the rest of Europe was that during the Golden Age, productivity growth was outpaced by investment growth. British productivity growth was lower than it should’ve been during the Golden Age, and was one of the clearer differences between Britain and the rest of Europe . Differences in work effort, restrictive labour practices, and management quality could’ve all …show more content…

Economic agreements and programs changed the economic environment greatly following WW2, and helped set the stage for the impending Golden Age. The Marshall plan helped stabilise the European economic environment and enable the free market, which was key to the Golden Age . GATT and Bretton Woods were both pan-European agreements that helped protect and promote the free market in Europe by protecting against tariffs and competitive deflation . While these institutions provided for new free trade opportunities, and institution reform, across many European countries, it affected Britain less, as these measures largely helped other European countries mirror the British financial system . A lack of productivity meant that Britain couldn’t fully capitalize on incoming cash flows during the Golden Age and this lack of productivity, among other reasons, was caused by a lack of social spending. While it may never have had the same capacity for catch-up growth as the rest of Europe, it’s certainly reasonable to believe that if Britain had made more social investment, it very well could’ve at least matched the productivity of its European counterparts, and, in turn, had slightly more impressive

Open Document