Mathew Harrison Brady, and Henry Drummond both have very different outlooks on life. Brady tends to think that if something is one way, then it should stay that way forever, whereas Drummond has a very open mind, and loves new ideas/opinions. They have different opinions on whether or not the right to think is on trial. Drummond wants to move forward, but people like Brady have moved forward in time, with there mind still stuck in the past, causing the world to still turn, with it not really moving. Jerome Lawrence and Robert Edwin Lee showcase the significant difference between these two characters, and they have a sense of good cop, bad cop.
Both being the challengers they are, they have their own sneaky antics to take what you said and contradict what you had said earlier; thus being great lawyers. "...everything that is in the bible should be accepted, exactly as it is given there" was something that Brady had mentioned, when put up on the stand and questioned by Drummond. But later Drummond questioned the idea of god
…show more content…
Although they have physical similarities, they both have very different characteristics. Drummond is an open-minded Atheist, who believes that everyone should have the right to think, and have an opinion. That was proven when he had said "With all respect to the bench, I hold that the right to think is very much on trial! It is fearfully in danger by the proceedings of the court." Drummond wants see an improved future, whereas Brady is not the best with change. Brady tends to be more of a yes-man, and has a pretty closed off mind about the future; he likes tradition and has issues adapting to change. He really cares about others opinion, and tends to try hard at being a people pleaser. When Brady had said “unless the state of mind of the members of the jury conforms to the laws and patterns of society”, it proved he is indeed a great fan of “pattern”, and isn’t custom to much change at
...he fact that Brady is being called Colonel Brady by the judge; he claims it gives his opponent an unfair advantage. The mayor is brought in to resolve the issue. He also grants Drummond the title of "Colonel" on a temporary, honorary basis. Now both lawyers are called Colonel.
On October 20, 2014 a young male teen was fatally shot in Chicago, Illinois. The shooting occurred in the middle of the road and the suspect that was fatally shot was named Laquan McDonald. McDonald was just 17 years old and was the suspect after initial reports placed him in the scene of a possible car jacking. It was reported that Laquan McDonald had a knife and was also seen slashing tires of a police cruiser. When police had finally had him surrounded in the middle of the road, one officer opened fire and released 16 shots into his body. Another deputy on hand said the use of force was not needed because Laquan was not in any way trying to attack the officers present. The officer who fired the 16 shots into Laquan is named Jason D. Van
...s inner self. What is seen as a relationship amongst these two young men is now torn apart by the transformation of Henry caused from his witnesses during warfare.
One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest and Fahrenheit 451 share two main characters that are seemingly lost in the unknown. Both Chief Bromden and Guy Montag are protagonist in the respective novels. These two characters both have a false sense of reality; however, this is the only reality they know. Bromden and Montag have little sense of what the world they live in has to offer. However things start to change for both of these men when they start to receive guidance from their counterparts, Randle McMurphy and Clarisse McClellan. Both of these characters become the catalyst for the freedom and liberation that Bromden and Montag come to find.
Henry Drummond is an acclaimed criminal-defense lawyer and recognized agnostic, so how could a man such as this respect and appreciate the life of the fundamentalist Christian Matthew Harrison Brady? Throughout the play Inherit the Wind Drummond demonstrates that though his opinions are much different than Brady and many of the townspeople of Hillsboro when it comes to religion, he is able and willing to respect these people’s values and beliefs. After being told of Brady’s death, Drummond’s respect for the man only seems to intensify. Despite Drummond and Brady’s evident past concerning both their old friendship and contrasting views on religion, Drummond still has a fair amount of respect for Brady, and though this does not affect the trial, it does affect the play.
Hobson explains that he has examined Marshall 's judicial writings though "the perspective of the common law tradition in which [Marshall] was bred" (Hobson xiii) in order to better understand his intentions. He states that Marshall carefully read legal texts with great attention to detail in an attempt to determine the intent of the writer. Similarly, Hobson tries to gain a better understanding of Marshall 's principles through his writings.
At first sight, the two main characters appear completely different, but we soon realize that their lives are very linked.
In the play “Twelve Angry men”, the story line presents a variety of perspectives and opinions between twelve very different men. Some are more likely to be pointed out as prejudice, and others are more focused on reaching fair justice. Clearly, it is quite difficult for different people to vote ‘guilty’ or ‘not guilty’ in unity when coming to a fair decision. In all of the twelve jurors, I have chosen Juror 3 and Juror 8 for contrast and comparison. I believe that Juror number 3 is a very opinionated man, with more differences than similarities comparing with Juror number 8.
On Sundays in the fall people all over the world are watching pro football. But do they know how it came to be or how the rules have gotten to be the way they are today? Most people don’t, so I am going to tell you all about it.
Henry Drummond and Clarence Darrow share a similar appearance. Inherit the Wind portrays Drummond as a “slouching hulk of a man, whose head juts out like an animal’s,” according to Reverend
Jan Schlichtmann is the main character of this true story. As a prominent attorney from Boston, who has an ego to match his bank account, he seems obsessed to find a way to consistently find bigger settlements and make a name for himself in the legal community. Though slightly inexperienced, he seems to be a natural in the courtroom, and even more so in the "game" of out-of-court-settlements. Jan owed part of his success due to the fact he surrounded himself with people who "counterbalanced" his personality. It is through their support in most of this story that he was able to negotiate through the tribulations. But through a host of events, Jan ended up spearheading the Wo...
...he amount of land he held, so he accused him as too get rid of him so the land would be easier to obtain but it ends up that Giles becomes accused also. Ann Putnam also tends to stir up quite a bit of conflict and jealously as her husband has. ( finish this evidence Overview:
Rachel and Drummond is an inspiration to many Americans, and the character Brady is a character that all Americans should stay away from. Rachel symbolizes a person with the freedom of thought. Furthermore, Drummond is shown standing up for his own beliefs about evolution. On the other hand, Brady is portrayed as overconfident and the role model that Americans should not follow. After reading Inherit the Wind, we should challenge ourselves to stand up for our own beliefs without being overconfident or prideful.
...ene illustrates. Through the process of developing Brady's character, Kramer questions whether it is possible for religion to exist in politics. Brady can't balance the two, as his ultimate collapse illustrates. Kramer also points out the detrimental, oppressive affect that a small town can have on the truth. The narrow mindedness of the town enabled Brady to take control and prevent any alternative point of view to be considered. Is it possible for a small town to equally consider both sides of an argument? Brady appears to the town as a very strong self-assured man who believes in his ideas. At the climax of the film, Drummond places Brady on the stand, and questions his ideas. This serves as a major theme for the film and as a result it becomes necessary to have a strong development of Brady's character, so that the viewer can better understand his fall.
similarities. For instance, in the film Dom Cobb is able to think about whether or not he is in a