Boy In The Striped Pajamas

669 Words2 Pages

In order to give out the true perspective of the Holocaust, filmmakers should factualize,not personalize the experience by trivializing, through communicating with type of art, making art personalized rather than having sources or materials to make it factual. Make sure that they can communicate through educating the people, more than trying to entertain the people. When making Holocaust films, filmmakers should avoid not using sources or references because it could lead to misinterpretation to the audience. They should also avoid lack of emotion. Emotion provides sympathy to the audience, making the audience feel for the characters.
There are plenty of examples of hollywood trivializing the holocaust such as in The Boy in the Striped Pajamas. The film is about an eight-year-old boy named Bruno, and his family, who moves near a concentration camp where his father has just become commandant. The son soon finds a Jewish boy named Shmuel , the same age as him in the concentration camp, and they start a forbidden friendship in search for the Jewish boy's father. The film trivializes the Holocaust because it focuses more on the friendship between the boys instead of the actual Holocaust and attempts to make the audience feel sympathetic for the Nazi family. Although The Boy in the Striped Pajamas trivializes the holocaust, Mark Herman does a good job providing the right amount of sympathy to make the audience feel for both Shmuel and Bruno. …show more content…

These films do a good job at avoiding trivialization.
For example, The Mortal Storm is about the Roth family living in a small village in Germany who gets separated when the Nazis come to power. This film shows the truth on how and what families went through when they were separated during the time of the Holocaust. Frank Borage, the director, analyzes the truth in the film by giving the right balance of

Open Document