Boston Tea Party Movement Analysis

1566 Words4 Pages

The civil rights era highlighted unacceptable conditions of inequality, economic distress, and obsolete government laws. These societal woes formed an outcry for change that propelled and forged leaders like Martin Luther King, Jr., Malcolm X, and the Black Panther Party’s Fred Hampton. Although these unique individuals had different visions on how to eradicate these conditions, they all had a belief in the power in numbers or the masses. Hence, today organizers tend to be more obscured. Instead of one emerging leader or a face of a movement(s), today’s protest movements have more collective or shared leadership. Unlike the protesting or boycotting of yesteryear, today’s movements will reach a higher volume of people. The rationale behind it, not because of lack of engagement, but due to technology. As we have delved into the purpose, process and historical accounting of the Poor Peoples Campaign and Resurrection City, we also must also focus on how we will protest today. One evening in December 1773 was the first documented protest within the colonies, later would evolve in the United States (US) known as the Boston Tea party. From the beginning of the U.S conception, protesting is indoctrinated in our history, speaking out against government and unfair …show more content…

This leverage with images and interviews legitimatizes their efforts. It led to a statement, FBI direct, J. Edgar Hoover that the Panthers are the "greatest threat to the internal security of the country." As Hoover depicted the leaders of the party and founder as public enemy’s number one, the movement managed to reach out to local gangs to stop committing crimes, creating free medical clinics and free lunch programs. Eventually, Hoover would succeed with his diligence of mistrust, drug addiction, internal hated provoked by falsified letters to

Open Document