Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effects of immigration on the economy
Immigration influence on economy
Effects of immigration on the economy
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
“Boom, Bust & Exodus: The Rust Belt, the Maquilas, and a Tale of Two Cities” is a nonfiction book written by Chad Broughton, which discusses the lives affected by the relocation of a Maytag appliance plant from Illinois to Mexico. This account offers a more dialed in perspective of those impacted by globalization first hand, therefore allowing the consequences of these changes to be personified rather than statistical. This disquisitions main topics, however, will be the effects of globalization as well as the challenges it has created for both Americans and Mexicans, including those followed in the book. Globalization in the context of sociology is a multiplex of ideas and theories. It’s difficult to truly understand what globalization is …show more content…
Political scientists Jacob S. Hacker and Paul Pierson are mentioned in Boom, Bust & Exodus, with a quote saying, “There is more inequality among workers with the same level of skills (measured by age, education and literacy) in the United States than there is among all workers in some of the more equal rich nations.” This is because the elite of the United States have come to value their own businesses for their own financial gain by outsourcing workers in other countries, which then hurts blue collar workers within the U.S. and mistreats as well as underpays the outsourced workers. This is exactly what happens in Boom, Bust & Exodus, where workers of the Maytag appliance plant go out of work because of the company’s decision to move to Mexico for cheaper labour. The workers in Illinois were making approximately $15 an hour, but once the company moved to Mexico, their wages were set to $1.10 an hour. Globalization has deeply affected those in the lower-class, who may be considered as less educated or unskilled to low skilled workers. In the text of Boom, Bust & Exodus, Broughton states, “Rising inequality is less about education gaps than it is about those at the very top of the income distribution pulling away.” The income rates of those who are rich have exponentially increased over the last few decades, while the poor have only become poorer. According to our notes, …show more content…
A house with “good rain protection”, “spray painted address” and “smooth concrete floors” is described as nicer than most. The consequence of cheap labour in order to provide cheaper prices for consumers has left these people struggling, working so hard while they cannot even afford a decent meal. This kind of housing would be considered very poor in America, and the fact that Lara is described to be nicer than most only shows that poverty is a life that is well-known to workers in urban areas. However, statistically we may not see this, because the poverty line has been set so low. Broughton states, “If Lara worked fifty weeks in a year, averaging 6.5 hours of overtime a year, he would earn about $3,000. The Lara Family , through Pablo’s sheer volume of work, lived above the official poverty line for urban dwellers.” This is an extreme contrast to the Illinois workers in the beginning of the book, who earned $15.10 an hour with benefits such as insurance and retirement. The book also mentions a peso crisis in 1994, and it worsened the wage gap because it allowed foreign companies to outsource and hire Mexicans workers for even
“Boom, Bust, Exodus” was drastically different than the other immigration books I have read. The author, Chad Broughton was draw to stories that showed industrial capitalism, globalization and economic issues in an economic yet personal way. The book depicts the economic and public history of two very different cities; Galesburg in Illinois and Reynosa at the Mexican border. The connection of these two cities is that Maytag’s primary manufacturing plant was shut down in Galesburg to be moved to Reynosa. This move was done for purely economic reasons but had tremendous positive and negative effects on both city’s economy and community. “Boom, Bust, Exodus” highlights a different side of immigration; where companies outsource their labor and
Year’s ago, mention of this widening gap between the privileged and the struggling was considered “Marxist”, but now the facts are too evident to be blamed on a belief. The richer continue to get richer and the poorer get poorer; due to the fact that, the wealthy pay the labor working majority unfair wages. Ironically, this “supreme” group makes their fortune because of these under paid people. For example, Walmart a low paying corporation owned by the wealthiest family in America. As previously stated, the success of the upper class is at the expense of the lower class and we see this in more ways then one: late fees and rates are collected by the rich, Realestate is bought up by them, and they have control of politics. The solution seen most fit by Ehrenreich and Lowenstein would be to remove the classes and have an egalitarian
Americans have financially and politically. Much of the financial gains made today go to the top one percent of earners in the United States. This increase in inequality has grown substantially in the last forty years. Wage inequality is different than the push for equal pay. According to Fortune.com, the salaries of CEO’s compared to the average worker are 300 times more (Addady 1). One of the reasons CEO’s are profiting more money is because technological advances are replacing human labor with robots or software. This investment in technology by firms increases the bottom line and is ever more important with the rising minimum wages set by local, state, and federal
Piatak, Tom. "Outsourcing Threatens American Workers." Opposing Viewpoints: Globalization. Ed. Louise I. Gerdes. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2006. Opposing Viewpoints Resource Center. Gale. Lynbrook High School. 6 Dec. 2009
The gap in wealth between the rich and the poor continues to grow larger, as productivity increases but wages remain the same. There were changes in the tax structure that gave the wealthy tax breaks, such as only taxing for social security within the first $113,700 of income in a year. For CEOs this tax was paid off almost immediately. Free trade treaties broke barriers to trade and resulted in outsourcing and lower wages for workers. In “Job on the Line” by William Adler, a worker named Mollie James lost her job when the factory moved to Mexico. “The job in which Mollie James once took great pride, the job that both fostered and repaid her loyalty by enabling her to rise above humble beginnings and provide for her family – that job does not now pay Balbina Duque a wage sufficient to live on” (489). When Balbina started working she was only making 65 cents an hour. Another huge issue lies in the minimum wage. In 2007, the minimum wage was only 51% of the living wage in America. How can a person live 51% of a life? Especially when cuts were being made in anti-poverty and welfare programs that were intended to get people on their feet. Now, it seems that the system keeps people down, as they try to earn more but their benefits are taken away faster than they can earn. Even when workers tried to get together to help themselves they were thrown
Globalization has several definitions, as Andrew McGrew underlines it. He uses four different ones in order to get a more complete definition. In this way globalization is defined as ‘the intensification of worldwide social relations which link distant localities in such a way that local happenings are shared by events occurring many miles away and vice versa’, ‘the integration of the world-economy’, the ‘de-territorialisation – or growth of supraterritorial relations between people’ and finally as ‘time-space compression’ (Giddens, 1990, p. 21, Gilpin, 2001, p. 364, Scholte, 2000, p. 46, Harvey, 1989, cited in Mc...
In this essay I will give a detailed explanation of what sociologists mean by the term ‘globalisation’ and how they have tried to explain it.
Globalization is a broad concept and the angle taken to define it can lead us to interpret the idea in many different ways. There is much controversy about what globalization actually means and many definitions fail to encompass social, cultural and technological exchanges between world systems. John Pilger suggests that "it is a jargon term which journalists and politicians have made fashionable which is often used in a positive sense to denote a 'Global village' of free trade, hi-tech marvels and all kinds of possibilities that transcend class, historical experience and ideology." (J.Pilger 1998:63). Taking a broader point of view, Bilton et al defines globalization as "The process whereby political, social, economic and cultural relations increasingly take on a global scale, and which has profound consequences for individuals, local experiences and everyday lives."
Typical workers started to make less money than they did thirty years ago while the top one percent has more than doubled their earnings, going from earning three hundred thousand or so dollars to making more than one million dollars per year while the typical worker makes around twenty thousand to forty thousand a year. Most citizens in the country are not able to purchase a home or receive a college education because of this alarming pay rate for the average citizen while those born into the right families can virtually attend any college or university they desire without having to work as hard as the common man. Those in wealthier families receive more opportunities to expand their wealth and net worth while everyday workers have to struggle to make ends meet without receiving many opportunities to change their lives and make life better for
After the cold war, word ‘globalization’ was commonly used at a time of unprecedented interconnectedness when advanced nations experienced a ruthless development by exploiting energy resources and stressing culture forms in developing countries. To identify the definition of ‘globalization’, it is significant to clarify its appearance as well as implication.
Harvey and Reed’s critique will be used to examine the conservative position on poverty that Lawrence Mead uses in his writing of The Logic of Workfare: the Underclass and Work Policy, and the validity of Harvey and Reed’s position will also be assessed. In 1958, Oscar Lewis began to research the subject of poverty, the results of which provided the foundation for his theory “The Culture of Poverty.” Lewis’ research revealed that those living in poverty displayed an ongoing pattern which was passed on through generations and therefore, their social trajectory was predictable. Data was collected from families in Mexico and Puerto Rico and Lewis (1966) documented the observations made on aspects of these groups of families, including “residence and employment history of each adult, family relations; income and expenditure; complete inventory of household and personal possessions; friendship patterns.” (p. 20)....
Globalization can briefly be defined as ‘something’ that affects and changes the traditional arrangements of the state system. It is a term that directly implies change and therefore is a continuos process over a long period of time as compared to quickly changing into a wanted or desir...
New York: W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. Kellner, Douglas. Theorizing Globalization. Sociological Theory. (Nov, 2002):
Globalization is defined as “the historical process involving a fundamental shift or transformation in the spatial scale of human social organization that links distant communities and expands the reach of power relations across regions and continents (Baylis, 2014).”
Globalization on a broader scale, is an integration act, involving cultural, mental, political as well as economic aspects of a person, among countries. It is mostly limited to, economic integration, associated with movement of people, exchange of technology and information, trade as well as financial flows. . This is practice is clearly miles ahead, as demonstrated by the ever increasing capital flows in the world economy as well as the level of importance, the world economy has. As a result of globalization, tremendous pressure is on the nations to keep up with its demands and this has had a lot of consequences. Some pundits will tell you that these effects are only economic based,