preview

Boom Boom

analytical Essay
1207 words
1207 words
bookmark

Transformation: Driven by Change The Greek philosopher Heraclitus stated, “the only thing that is constant is change” (“Goodreads”). This quote serves as an illustration of the episodic protracted and contracted nature of the Army. The events of September 11, 2001, and subsequent invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq during the global war on terror, led to expansion and force structure changes in the Army. Presently, the United States is enacting measures to become more fiscally prudent. This has led to overall decrease in the Army’s budget. Consequently, the Army has imposed force-shaping measures to support these congressionally mandated reductions. The needs and requirements of the current strategic environment drive transformation in the military. The elements of transformation consist of causation factors, supporting policies, and its overall effectiveness. Leaders at the tactical, operational, and strategic level must possess insight on all these elements. Transformational Change after 9/11 The events of September 11, 2001, and subsequent invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq during the global war on terror set the conditions for transformational growth in the Army. The global war on terrorism led to incremental increases to the Army budget and changes in force structure to include personnel, and equipment modernization. Correspondingly, force shaping policies and procedures supported this transformational growth. Budget In FY 2003, the Army’s budget was $123 billion and experienced an average annual increase of 4% over the last eleven years (Dyson & Welch, 2014). The budget increase was necessary to support the global war on terror in Afghanistan and Iraq. Additionally, budget increases were necessary to support cha... ... middle of paper ... ...t trains and deploys its forces (Lopez, 2013). Luckily, the Army’s senior Officers and NCOs can recall the mistakes of the drawdown in the 1990s. This provides perspective going forward as they shape the force. Conclusion Similar to change, transformation is a constant evolution. Leaders at the tactical, operational, and, strategic level must anticipate the causation factors and the effects on the force. Leaders who are able to do this will be able to address the challenges associated with a buildup or drawdown of the force. It is imperative that leaders pay attention to force shaping polices and understand who, and how it affects those populations. In the 21st century, terrorist attacks, and fiscal irresponsibility, were the vehicles of change for the military. These types of events cannot be predicted, however, the one thing that can be predicted, change.

In this essay, the author

  • Analyzes how the events of september 11, 2001, and subsequent invasions of afghanistan and iraq during the global war on terror, led to expansion and force structure changes in the army.
  • Explains that the army's budget was $123 billion and experienced an average annual increase of 4% over the last eleven years. the increase was necessary to support the global war on terror in afghanistan and iraq.
  • Explains that the army focused on developing a modular brigade concept. a 2012-rand study described the conditions leading to force structure changes.
  • Describes gen shinseki's desire to have a mobile and rapid deployable force.
  • Explains the increased demand for army forces after 9/11 in iraq, afghanistan and other counterterrorism endeavors.
  • Explains that the modular concept would allow for greater advantages through its flexibility and support the aforementioned conditions.
  • Explains that the army had 486,509 active duty personnel in 2003 and peaked at 549,790 in 2011. the shift to a modular force, constant deployment cycles, and requirements for vital military occupations contributed to an overall increase in army’s end strength.
  • Explains how the army shifted from a cold war strategy to the full-spectrum aforgen based strategy in support of the modular brigade concept.
  • Explains that a reduction in recruiting standards supported the army's growth. these loosened standards included policy changes regarding tattoos, education, and moral waivers.
  • Analyzes how the force's ability to combat threats in a 21st century environment helped in measuring the effectiveness of transformation. the fiscally rich post 9/11 environment provided the capacity to modernize antiquated equipment.
  • Explains that the fiscal crisis plaguing the united states led to another 21st century transformation, downsizing. the quadrennial defense review calls for a strategy and risk focused approach when making decisions regarding force shaping.
  • Explains that army personnel costs in fy 15 will be 46% of a $120.5 billion dollar budget, which includes reduction in personnel end strengths. budget cuts, along with sequestration, would reduce the army to 420,000 by fy16.
  • Explains that the army's ability to react to future threats will measure the effectiveness of a fiscally constrained transformation.
  • Explains that transformation is a constant evolution. leaders must anticipate the causation factors and the effects on the force.
  • Explains the events of september 11, 2001, and subsequent invasions of afghanistan and iraq during the global war on terror set the conditions for transformational growth in the army.
  • Explains that the budget control act of 2011 directed a $487 billion reduction in the dod budget over the next 10 years. sequestration requires an additional $50 billion in cuts annually until 2021.
Get Access