Blurred Lines

1178 Words3 Pages

The Song of Theft Everyone remembers the ”Blurred Lines” scandal. The song that Robin Thicke and Pharrell William’s ended up losing thousands of dollars over. The song was noticeably similar to Marvin Gaye’s song “Got to give it up” and it turns out that the majority of the song was sampled Gaye’s song. Thicke and William’s thought it would be best to sue the gays first before letting themselves get sued, but in the end they realized that was a poor choice. The trial ended with the blurred lines men the losing the case to the rightful owners of the music, the Gay family. How would you feel if someone stole something of yours and never gave you credit. They became successful because of your ideas and all you can do is miserably watch there success. Fair use and Copyright laws prevent creators in the scenario from having to to watch someone steel from them, and with these laws creators can know what other creators can do with their creation. Copyright and Fair Use laws are essential in the music industry. Copyright is essential to protect the entertainment industry. …show more content…

People are not usually informed about what they can and cannot do with an Artists music, even Artists themselves. Fair use is usually determined by the purpose and nature of product along with the parts of the song they are using in comparison to the work itself (Drummond). There are three types of fair use: nominative, comparative advertising, and parody. Nominative fair use is the ability to use a trademark to compare or help describe another product. Comparative Advertising states that the product or service being compare is the same or at least similar to the other product or service. Lastly Parodies are funny exaggerations of entertainment that has already been established. This fair use type seems to be the most controversial (Celedonia and Doyle)

More about Blurred Lines

Open Document