Bigger Thomas Analysis

1091 Words3 Pages

Initially, through throwing ‘Bigger Thomas’ back at those who made him who he was he is making the statement that the power and privilege will always be in the favor of whites. In the moment that ‘Bigger’ killed that girl, he knew that regardless, he would have been guilty if found with a woman who was white. It did not mater if he had not done anything, the fact that he was black was the real crime. The whites have the title to power because they are white, they can have things and do things that blacks cannot. Howe expresses to the reader that Wright shows the reader the real issue of the crime— ‘Bigger Thomas’s crime was that he had murdered a white girl and his biggest crime was that he was black. This is the problem of race that Wright …show more content…

She discusses how Jacobs was harassed by her slave holder and how he would constantly feed her mind with the words that came to no surprise to her. He owned her and there was very little that she could do about it. This was the kind of abuse that Jacobs felt was wicked. Even though Jacobs suffered the torment—she knew that if she would have lashed back, she could be killed. In her article, Miller writes:
Jacobs could defend herself, but she fully understood that her situation was ultimately hopeless, for the slave girl lived in a state where ‘there is no shadow of law to protect her from insult, from violence, or even from death; all these are inflicted by fiends who bear the shape of men (Miller, 34).
Slave women had no choice but to suffer through the torment of their masters in that they had no other option. The law was against them and therefore, a slave woman has no way to defend herself. If she were to fight back, it would be a battle that would not be in her favor; she would …show more content…

In comparison to other slave women victims, Jacobs situation may not have seemed that bad. Essentially, masters or white men who instigated sexual activity with a slave woman succeed in violating her completely (Miller, 35). In her article, Miller states: “According to historian George P. Rawick, ‘masters, their male offspring, white overseers, and other non-slaveholding whites were usually permitted to make sexual alliances on either a casual or more formal basis with one or more slave women” (Miller, 35). This form of sexual abuse was happening to a great deal of slave women and most men would succeed in taking full advantage of these women. There is nothing that a slave woman could do, and the sad part is—most women would have no choice but to give into this hostile act. Miller explains that slave women had two choices: “they could either give up their bodies to the desires of the white man or refuse submission and face certain physical abuse” (Miller, 35). Essentially, a slave woman did have a decision, but either way she would have to suffer terrible consequences. A slave woman could choose to refuse to give up her body and remain pure, but in return—suffer the consequence of being beaten to death. At that point, a slave woman must choose what she valued most: her Chasity or her

Open Document