More handpicked essays just for you.
Argumentative/ persuasive essay
Major aspects of argumentative essay and persuasive
Argumentative/ persuasive essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Ben Shapiro recently wrote a column to give his thoughts and opinions on the “characterless people ... running for office more and more” to his already established supporters. Shapiro’s purpose of the essay is to convince those on his side, that those who support the “delegate model” are degenerates and that the “Burkean model” is superior. He achieves this by constantly berating the opposing side with his use of the syntactical element priming, negative diction, and a bipolar tone. At the beginning, Shapiro proposes a question about what role representatives should play in the government, and in his questioning develops his side to the reader. “Were representatives supposed to act as simple proxies for their constituents? Or were they supposed to exercise independent judgment?” Shapiro uses the word “simple” to …show more content…
Next he states a fact, “history has shown that bad men in positions of power ... tend to abuse power,” and brings that around to his point that “we must measure our candidates for character.” This helps solidify what he has alluded to throughout the column, that characterless representatives are odious and immoral. As his coda, Shapiro quotes John Adams prayer regarding the White House: “May none but honest and wise men ever rule under this roof,” and that John “didn’t pray that they agree with him on tariffs,” so why should we pray about policy when the maker is morally
Double edge sword is what lies at the heart of Roach’s issue with the American political system. While the public’s trust for their elected officials continues to disintegrate because of backroom deals and a poor transparency, it is exactly what the American political system requires its participants to do in order to be effective deal makers and according Roach, “Campaign contributions and smoke-filled rooms, pork is a tool of democratic governance, not violation of it. It can be used for corrupt purposes but also, for vital ones.” Roach argues that the public must take the good with the bad, they do not have to like it or agree with it, but they must see the importance that each side plays. Roach believes that it has been within the past 40 years that publics growing mistrust for the American political system has pushed toward favoring disintermediation, populism, and self-expression over professionals and political insiders.
Both works provide valuable insight into the political atmosphere of American society, but vary greatly in their intended message, usage of persuasive method, projected audience, and choice of tone. One can see resemblance, however, in the fact that the authors of both articles strive to spark a reaction in their readers and encourage change. In that regard, while Hedges’
In the past century, people continued to express an increasingly discontent view of Congress especially true when one looks back before the Clinton Impeachment debacle As the size of the nation and the number of congressman have grown, the congress has come under attack by both public influences and congressman themselves. Yet looking at one congressman's relationship with his or her constituents, it would be hard to believe that this is the branch of government that has come under suspect. In “If Ralph Nader says congress is 'The broken branch,' how come we love our congressman so much?” author Richard F. Fenno, Jr., provides insight into this view and why, through congress coming under fire, constituents still feel positively about there congressmen. Although congress is often criticized, its fine tuned functioning is essential in checking the power of congress without hindering the making of legislation.
One of the biggest misconceptions of today’s society is that politics is run by pure fact and argument, with no spiritual aspect. However, Amanda Porterfield verifies in her novel Conceived in Doubt that this statement is pretentious and false. Amanda Porterfield takes us back to the time of early government structure and development. This era in the United States is in a stage of constant change and reformation. The United States could even be argued as blind by their religious views, affecting their morals and well-being for the future of the nation. In her novel, Porterfield stresses that the government is in no way free of the church’s principles and deserts the attempt to break the bond.
New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 2004. Romance, Joseph. Political Science 6 class lectures. Drew University, Summer 2004.
In the story “Inez” by Merle Hodge, Mr. James appears each collection day to fearlessly collect rent, or evict if needed, however, he demonstrates no such courage towards his wife as he does with his tenants . Though he sees an injustice in his wife’s demands, he would rather face an angry tenant and hungry children than fail in his duty toward her. The courage he demonstrates while collecting rent is not evident when facing his wife. Mr. James is a hypocrite for enabling his wife’s greed even though morally he knows it is wrong. A similar moral conflict is evident through the behavior and actions of some politicians seeking election. Politicians run for election, willing to say anything to get elected, though morally they may not agree with what they say.
Edmund Burke supports a form of representative government, because he believed that elected representatives are individuals with a higher sense of responsibility, intellectual capacity, and social status. Therefore, they have a better perception in judgment over the interest that concerns the government and the nation as a whole, rather than to solely represent people’s opinion. In addition, Burke’s view about representative government who caters its constituents, can lead to government dysfunction and inefficacy, because they would be forced to fulfill people’s wishes especially when seeking re-election.
As a matter of fact, Kevin Spacey once said in an interview with The Baltimore Sun, “The great thing about the original series and Michael Dobson’s book is that they were based on Shakespeare” (Tribunedigital-baltimoresun- Feb 2014). This web-series can be considered as one of the best rework of ‘Tragedy of Macbeth’. However, it serves more than a mere classic adaptation; the popularity of ‘house of cards’ can be connected to our increasing cynicism about the current state of the American politics. ‘House of Cards’ reveals to us a system where raw power wins every time. The question that drives ‘House of Cads’ is: Is politics nothing but pure spectacle or does it have more into it? In the cynical world of ‘House of Cards’, characters are constantly maintaining an image, both public and private. As discussed earlier most of the show’s plot and characters are inspired by Shakespeare’s Macbeth, This significant reference to theater throughout the show points to the more fundamental concept that appearance derives politics: Politics is theater. Commentators bemoan the fact that politics has become theater, with catchphrases replacing real political arguments. However, German philosopher Hannah Arendt expands on this and says: “the realm of appearance is the realm of politics”; and “Appearance is reality” (240). This argument is greatly illustrated through this show and Macbeth’s
Citizens of the United States rely heavily on their representatives to ensure that their concerns are heard, as well as that their needs are met. Descriptive and agency representation are two types of representation. Descriptive representation is the idea that one will get representation when they share characteristics with representatives such as race, religion, and gender (Conover, 10/13). This means that persons who have similar backgrounds and experiences should also have similar political preferences. Therefore, the characteristics of the elected representatives should clearly epitomize the characteristics of their constituents. The importance of descriptive representation regarding the American Democracy is that it enhances the representation
For example, Brain McGee, a community scholar and department chair at the college of Charleston in South Carolina argues in South Carolina’s newspaper, The post and Courier. That “incivility encourages uncommitted voters and media organizations to pay attention” (471). Words can play very important role of public change. We cannot be irresponsible citizen even if it seems to be beneficial.
Dahl's Who Governs the House? expresses the pluralist belief that the The political arena is an open system where everyone may participate and express grievances, which in turn lead to decision making. Those who propose alternatives and initiate issues which contribute to the decision making process. demonstrate observable influence and control over those who fail. together to express any interest in the political process.
Kramnick, Isaac, and Theodore J. Lowi. American Political Thought: a Norton Anthology. New York: W.W. Norton, 2009. Print.
The problems within the Principal-Agent model are numerous and detrimental to the functionality of the system when a cost/benefit analysis is applied to the Principal actor (i.e. the public). While Geoffrey Brennan and Alan Hamlin see the principal-agent model as a sort of least worst system that, while flawed, is still mendable while still maintaining it's central characteristics. One of the main criticisms against the Principal-Agent model is concerning a question that has been asked for almost as long as representative government: Does the representative make decisions that his/her constituency wants or do they do what is in their “interest”? Edmund Burke, in his famous speech to the Electors of Bristol, remarked that a representative's “mature judgment” and “enlightened conscience” allows him/her to choose what is in the best interest of their constituency. This form of thinking is necessarily implied in ...
A good representative doesn’t look at their job as just a salary. “During the early Congresses, being a senator or representative was a part-time occupation” (Davidson, Oleszek, Lee, & Schickler, 2015, 35). Today, a good representative spends more time working with other elected officials to rectify the issues that all people are hindered by. Although, many people do not believe that members of congress are in session for a sufficient amount of time to figure out solutions to the issues that affect
The scholars who helped this school saw representatives as people, assets, and advantages for be produced and worked with — not as machines, as previously. A few people and tests helped this hypothesis.