Analysis Of Piaget's Cat In The Hat

1025 Words3 Pages

“Theatre is like a gym for the empathy. It’s where we can go to build up the muscles of compassion, to practice listening and understanding and engaging with people that are not just like ourselves. We practice sitting down, paying attention and learning from other people’s actions. We practice caring.” (Bill English of the SF Playhouse). This quote accurately summarises the purpose of Children’s Theatre, to help the growth and understanding of children whilst also keeping them entertained through theatrical techniques. The National Theatre’s Cat in the Hat, along with our performance pieces of Cranky Bear and Possum Magic all showcased these techniques in a number of ways, whilst also subconsciously coinciding with the child development theories …show more content…

In Cat in the Hat, the character of the fish is portrayed through the use of a puppet, however the puppeteer is visible throughout the entire play, yet this does not break the immersion of the viewers. This is due to their understanding of object permanence. According to Piaget’s theory of cognitive development, a child gains the ability to understand fully where an object is found or where it is hidden at the approximate age of eighteen months (Jean Piaget’s Object Permanence, accessed 28th October 2015). With the knowledge of what the puppet is, they are able to differentiate the puppet with the puppeteer. They can comprehend that the puppeteer is an essential part of the production, and that although he is clearly visible, the focus is on the fish’s actions, with the puppeteer not a participant in the actual story of the performance. The use of music in Cat in the Hat is another key technique, as it stimulates the sense of hearing and helps the children correspond certain volumes and tones to different moods in the performance. As the music is played in a happy style, the children can learn that whatever may be happening in the performance is a good thing and feel more comfortable in their understanding of the character’s actions. This links back to the original quote …show more content…

The exaggeration was apparent in all of the different animals and was to clearly highlight their identity. Each character had an easily identifiable personality and this helped the children in understanding the character’s motives, and grow to feel comfortable with these extreme personalities, which relates to Bill English’s quote, as he states that children “practice listening and understanding and engaging with people that are not just like ourselves”. The audience interaction in Cranky Bear was very effective, as a result of Vygotsky’s Zones of Proximal Development. Vygotsky’s Zones of Proximal Development involves three different levels in which an individual is able to accomplish a task, with the zone seen in this performance being the one in which “learning is dependent on interventions by a more competent other”(Kozulin, 2003, p.41). When the actors called upon an audience member to help them with a task, they clearly showed what they required them to do, and so the participant was able to effectively accomplish the goal. Cranky Bear used theatrical techniques which educated it’s audience in different ways, whilst Possum Magic featured techniques which relied on prior knowledge and instinct to effectively

More about Analysis Of Piaget's Cat In The Hat

Open Document