Beccaria Vs Classical Criminology

422 Words1 Page

Classical Criminology is “narrowly concerned with the administration of justice, rather than… exploring the causes of crime and criminal motivations” (Classical Criminology, pg. 44). Classical criminology was developed in the eighteen century, and was well associated with the Enlightenment. By that time, enlightenment thinkers such as John Locke and Hobbes laid a great stress on human equality, to create a social foundation (Classical Criminology, pg. 43). On the other hand Beccaria who was a classical criminology figure, acknowledged that while human rights was important, it was also important and necessary to have justice, social order and rules. Beccaria aid to the creation of a law, which the people would have to follow, and if those laws were to be broken, then there would be a certain punishment. Beccaria believed that punishment “should have one purpose- to deter …show more content…

We break the law and we receive a certain punishment, which depends on the degree of the crime that was committed. A good example was found in the Chicago Tribute online newspaper, which described the situation of Shetara J.P. Beene. The article stated, “A 29-year-old woman who allegedly evaded police for two years is in custody and facing trial on charges of defrauding five area bank branch offices, three of them in Naperville… Bail has been set at $150,000 for Shetara J.P. Beene” (Bill Bird). Before Shetara J.P. Beene was charged with bank fraud she was also charged in 2006 with forgery. “She printed a counterfeit check for $650 made out in her name and issued by Loretto Hospital in Chicago, then tried to cash at a TCF Bank branch in Lisle, according to records” (Bill Bird). By having a history of related crime, Shetara is facing jail time with a $150,000 set bail. Her punishment was balanced with the crime she committed. My question now is what happened after a person gets punished many times and still keeps breaking the

Open Document