Barnabas Controversy

1409 Words3 Pages

We can hardly imagine a New Testament canon if Barnabas had not mentored Paul. Although Barnabas does not get frequent mention in the lists of great Church thinkers, his intentional approach to befriending Paul is paradigmatic for theological educators. More than that, Barnabas brought Paul into the believers’ community, for theological education is most effectively done therein. Teachers and students all need strong community friendships to bring out their best and to curtail theological idiosyncrasy. The academy may laud great scholarship, but the Church craves scholar-pastors who mentor and have been mentored—or more biblically, discipled—and who promote community. Community does not arise by accident; it is formed intentionally by key members who have a proclivity …show more content…

In comparison with many other countries, the American Church is well resourced. One can hardly say anything about the academy without noting the large numbers of underemployed biblical scholars with PhDs in the United States, even while the Church in parts of Africa, Asia, South America, and even Europe are desperate for scholar-pastors to help in theological school teaching. Again, following the example of my own mentor Gordon Fee who took one term in three to serve the Church in developing countries, I hope to continue my commitment to teaching and training national church leaders in under-resourced countries, perhaps by volunteering my services abroad, or by leading student teams on short-term trips overseas, or by being involved in a college’s international students group. Believing in reciprocity of community, I believe that my own understanding of theological education will be enhanced significantly by the worldwide communion of the Church’s scholar-pastors and their congregations. Given the cross-culture ministry of Paul the scholar and Barnabas the mentor, such endeavors seem

Open Document