At The Holocaust Museum Subjectivity Analysis

556 Words2 Pages

7.3 CWT Argument Essay

Just imagine, being forced to work every day and not getting enough food, becoming so weak you can't even get up, or being forced into a ghetto and not being allowed to leave. During the holocaust this is what happens to many people. When an author writes about the holocaust they have the option of using subjectivity and objectivity. Objectivity is when the author uses facts and data to educate the reader about something that happened. Subjectivity is when the author uses emotional words to show the reader how they feel. Some authors choose to use only objectivity or subjectivity. If the main purpose of the article is to educate the reader, the author may choose to write a paper that is only objective. If the author is writing an opinion piece, then they would use subjectivity. In the article At the Holocaust Museum by David Oliver Relin the author uses both objectivity and subjectivity. …show more content…

He uses words to communicate what he sees. When the author says “the enormous black-and-white photo facing the elevator shows the charred corpses of more than 50 Jews killed in the Ohrdruf concentration camp.” it helps the reader understand the type of death many people suffered in a time before color photography was popular. The author explains that “Making sure the world knows exactly what happened to these 50 Jewish prisoners, and to the 6 million Jews and other victims who were systematically exterminated by Nazi Germany during World War II, is the mission of the Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington, D.C. Since it opened its doors in 1993, more than 3.5 million people have come to see the museum's powerful exhibits”. This helps the reader understand the purpose of the Holocaust Museum and ***what it is trying to tell us***. The objectivity in this writing helps us comprehend what happened during the

Open Document