Army Performance Management Essay

902 Words2 Pages

The purpose of the Army’s performance management system is listed under the second goal and is best defined by objectives 2.1 and 2.2. As Major Hines replied, when questioned on the ability of the performance management system to meet the organizational goals, “leaders are selected for continued service and promotion with consideration to their completed assignments and demonstrated potential to succeed at higher levels within the organization.” Similarly, objective 2.1 describes a “culture that recognizes and advocates the value of effectively leading, managing, and improving the delivery of Title 10 functions to deliver readiness to the Nation” (The Office of Business Transformation, 2016, p.7). Objective 2.2 expands on this idea of effective …show more content…

The Army’s method is to assess performance is based on leadership attributes and competencies through clear delineation of responsibilities, which enables the Army to select leaders with attributes and competencies that demonstrate potential through past performance for continued service and promotion (Department of Human Resources at Fort Belvoir, 2014). This is done using a relative format, as previously described by Gorman, Meriac, Roch, Ray, and Gamble, which allows the Army to simplify evaluations by rating soldiers against their peers on the following attributes and competencies: character, presence, intellect, leads, develops, and achieves. This annual evaluation report referred to as an Officer Evaluation Report or OER to the Human Resources Officer should start with an initial counseling session with the rater or senior rater. In this initial counseling session goals, expectations, and responsibilities are defined upon assuming a position or following the conclusion of a rating period similar to the performance agreement previously described by Šikýř (2013). In addition to an initial counseling routine counseling sessions can be scheduled throughout the rating period; however, the army only requires submission of an annual OER to be added to an officer’s record for selection for continued service and promotion

Open Document