Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The problem with the juvenile justice system
The problem with the juvenile justice system
Impact of violence on children
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The problem with the juvenile justice system
Argumentative Writing Assessment
Teens who commit violent crimes should be tried as an adult. Anybody who aims a weapon at a minor or an adult without a logical reasoning are dangerous. People don’t have the potential to know what the threatening individual will be like in 5, 10, or 15 years. Minors are able to understand what the consequences are if they commit a violent crime.
Pointing a hazardous weapon at a child or a mature without a reasonable explanation is life threatening. In the article, Juvenile Justice: Too Young for Life in Prison, it states the following quote,” Anybody who pulls a gun and aims it at a police officer is a very serious threat and I would consider him a very dangerous individual,” said chief deputy Brenda Beadle
Over the years many violent crimes have been committed more by teenagers. The more serious crime the teenager did with psychology recommends that juveniles aren’t full responsible for what happen. In Anna Quindlen’s essay, The C Word in the Hallway, is about psychological autopsy with many peoples examples and how if health insurances provided coverage, then not many teens would have committed crimes. In Charlie Spence’s essay, Sixteen, talked about his locked up experience. There are crimes that aren’t that bad, but if a crime was committed so badly then the perpetrators should be locked away and be trialed as an adult.
Although some would argue that juveniles undergo a series of brain development in which they lose brain cells that control their impulses, risk taking, and self-control (Thompson 46). However this lost during development does not excuse juvenile from their accountability, instead they should acquire special attention, proper nurturing and guidance during development in order to help them make better decisions. Thus teenagers accused of violent crimes should be tried and sentenced justly, regardless of age, to ensure the law's equality and educate juveniles regarding the potential severity of their actions' consequences. That is how we'll be able prevent future acts of violence and crimes from occurring in society.
“Man masters nature not by force but by understanding. This is why science has succeeded where magic failed: because it has looked for no spell to cast over nature”. From the beginning of time man and nature has been in conflict with one another because, as a whole, there is no cooperating. Each one tirelessly wants its way. The Man is fighting for dominance and nature w never yielding its authority. In American Literature, many authors illustrate this theme in their writing. Specifically the writers Jack London in The Law Of Life, Stephen Crane The Open Boat and Mark Twain’s Huckleberry Fin. Each explores the relationship between humans and nature but with slightly different methods. Mark Twain uses nature in a realistic way, Jack London in a naturalistic way and Stephen Crane constitutes a combination of both.
once the minor has committed a violent crime, they are no longer a kid. The minor had the ability to know right from wrong, but he still chose to commit the heinous crime anyway. Choosing to commit this violent crime means that the minor chose to act as an adult and must be held accountable. Once the minor has made the decision to act as an adult, they must be treated as an adult. If we do not teach minors that what they did has consequences they will never learn. Arguments can be made that minors should not be treated as adults and while these arguments do have merit, they are not my beliefs. In my opinion, minors who commit violent crimes need to be tried as adults. Justice does not discriminate when it comes to age. Right is right, and wrong is wrong and the wrong should be punished equally.
In conclusion, juvenile offenders should be tried as adults. Adult classification enables the judicial system to punish offenders to the fullest extent of the law. Juveniles should be held responsible for their actions because they have values and morals and are able to realize consequences just as well as adults. The tougher punishments given by adult courts discourage other young people from committing crimes and help to keep society safer fro everyone. Justice is served for criminal and victim when the punishment allowed by adult courts compensates for the crime committed. When juveniles are tried as adults in the criminal justice program, society as a whole benefits.
In my opinion, I do feel that juveniles should be tried as an adult depending on the crime. I feel if a child decides to make a huge life changing decision they should have to suffer the consequences. If their crime is something little and they don't have a criminal background, then no I don't think they should be.
There has always been controversies as to whether juvenile criminals should be tried as adults or not. Over the years more and more teenagers have been involved in committing crimes. In some cases the juries have been too rough on the teens. Trying teens as adults can have a both positive and negative views. For example, teens that are detained can provide information about other crimes, can have an impact in social conditions, and serve as experience; however, it can be negative because teens are still not mature enough for that experience, they are exposed to adult criminals; and they will lose out on getting an education.
Juveniles deserve to be tried the same as adults when they commit certain crimes. The justice systems of America are becoming completely unjust and easy to break through. Juvenile courts haven’t always been known to the everyday person.
Every day in the news there are stories about children killing other children. An eight year old finds his parents gun, shoots and kills his little sister. The boy will not be charged with murder because he is too young to be held accountable. A teenage girl breaks up with her sixteen-year-old boyfriend. He does not want to break up so he rapes and slits her throat. If he cannot have her, no one will. The sixteen year old is charged with aggravated first-degree murder and sentenced to life without parole in prison. He will go straight to an adult facility. His family is fighting to have him moved to a juvenile facility until he turns seventeen. Juvenile offenders that commit heinous crimes should be sent to adult facilities.
What makes a good person good? According to WikiHow, "We should learn to define our own morals ourselves. One of the simplest ways to do so is to love others, and treat them as you would like to be treated. Try to think of others before yourself. Even doing small things daily will greatly enrich and improve your life, and the lives of others around you." This quote shows us what we need to do in order to be what society thinks as, “good". In order to be a good person, you have to do good and moral things in your society consistently. However people might think that by doing one good thing once in a while will automatically make you a “good person”, but in reality it doesn’t.
Juvenile offenders should not be tried as adults because there are differences between a teenager and adult. A teenager is not mature as an adult. Some teenagers are capable to change their behavior and are capable to recognize their own mistakes. It is a huge mistake for juveniles offenders to be tried as adults and send them to adult court and prison . There are many factors why they should not be tried as adult.
If a teenager is charged with a serious crime she or he should be tried as an adult.
“According to the FBI , youth under 18 account for 14% of all arrest a year. 34% of those are arrested for violent crimes.” When the supreme court ruled that life without parole for a juvenile, it was outrageous because why should a 17 and a half year old be considered a juvenile for setting off a bomb in a crowded mall or even gunning down dozens of students and teachers, why should they be considered children. Teens should be punished for their actions accordingly for the law they broke. For anything above a misdemeanor they should do some sort of jail time depending on the seriousness of the crime.
Imagine being the only teenager in a room full of murders. Nearly 3,000 teenagers nationwide have been sentenced to life imprisonment without the possibility of parole (CHILDREN IN PRISON). A child's life should not be thrown away just because they committed a mistake they were not fully aware of. When a minor commits a crime justice is not being severed. Their actions are not the same as adults. Teenagers do not get the same benefits as adults so why would they be tried as an adult. Juveniles should not be tried as adults because their brains are not fully developed so they are not fully aware of what they are doing.
If a juvenile, over fourteen has the ability and willingness to commit a violent crime they should be tried and punished as an adult. A fourteen year old knows right from wrong. He (or she) is able to tell whether they are committing a crime. If a juvenile is mature enough to commit an adult crime, they should be treated as an adult, and punished justly according to the adult law. The difference in age in two people should not determine their punishment if they have committed the same crime under the same or similar pretenses.