Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay gun control history united states mla scribd
Gun Control Laws And The Government Essays
Essay gun control history united states mla scribd
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay gun control history united states mla scribd
“It is in our sincerest hope that even those on the extremes begin to look for areas of agreement, and use those areas as a point of departure for sensible approaches to minimize the dreadful harm that gunshot injuries cause” (Boylan, Kates, Lindsey & Gugala, 2013). Despite the declining rates of gun-related deaths, it can be agreed gun violence is prevalent in the United States. Compared to other developed countries, the United States maintains the highest rate of gun ownership as well as gun-related deaths (Lopez, 2018; Masters, 2016; Preidt, 2016). This in part is due to a lack of stringent gun control. Unlike the United States, other developed countries have enacted regulations in response to mass-shooting events. Common regulations developed …show more content…
This divide complicates any action for compromise. Those who advocate for gun control promote a ban for high-capacity magazines, assault weapons and civilian ownership of military-grade firearms. They argue rates of suicide, homicide, accidental gun-related injuries and societal costs related to gun violence will decline. They also argue that guns are rarely used for self-defense but rather stolen and used by criminals. Lastly, they believe the Second Amendment was not established as an unlimited right to own guns but instead as a protective right for militias to own …show more content…
According to the Second Amendment, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed” (U.S. Const. amend. II). Following the ratification of the Ten Amendments were gun regulations that further defined and shaped the Second Amendment. In the 1930s were three acts of legislation that passed in regards to gun control. The National Firearms Act of 1934, which imposed the manufacture, sale and transport of firearms to be taxed; the Federal Firearms Act of 1938, which required manufacturers, importers and dealers to obtain a federal firearms license; and the 1939 United States v. Miller ruling, which regulated the sales of short barrel shotguns (Gray, 2018). As a result of the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, more strict regulations were imposed under the Gun Control Act of 1968. This legislation banned the transportation of firearms (unless used for sporting events) and the eligibility for felons and those labeled mentally ill to purchase a firearm. This act also required buyers of handguns to be at least 21 years of age and firearms to be manufactured with serial numbers. According to Gray, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) considered this act the “stricter licensing and regulation on the firearms industry”
In America guns have been a part of the country’s society since it’s birth. Throughout history the citizens of the US have used firearms to protect the nation, protect their families, hunt for food and engage in sporting activities. The issue of Guns and gun control is complex. Weighing the rights and liberties of the individual against the welfare and safety of the public has always been a precarious balancing act. In the United States, gun control is one of these tumultuous issues that has both sides firmly entrenched in their positions. Those parties in favor of gun ownership and the freedom to use and keep arms, rely on the fact that the provision for such rights is enshrined in their constitution. In this climate of growing violence, rife with turmoil and crime, gun advocates feel more than ever that their position is justified. As citizens of the “Land of the Free” possessing a gun is a fundamental right, and may even be a necessity... Anti- gun lobbyists point to the same growing violence and gun related crimes in an effort to call on the government to take action. By enacting more laws and stricter control, these people not in favor of guns feel society would be better safer.
Left, right, Liberal, Conservative, Democratic, Republican. There are a lot of synonyms for the sides of our nation divided. Divided on many things: religion, political views, morals, etc.. For a nation that prides ourselves on extraordinary security and unity, it is quite ironic that so many issues can cause such distress and uproar within communities. One such issue is gun control. As a white male in a middle-lower class family that has never owned a gun, I may be somewhat biased. Objectively as I can, I am going to report the facts and more importantly, try to find the core issues at play.
The Federal Government today is putting forth much effort in order to control the purchase and registration of handguns. In 1993, Congress approved the Brady Bill that requires a mandatory five-day waiting period when buying a gun. The recent school shootings have pushed Congress to pass a bill requiring approximately 80% of handguns to be produced with child safety locks. The ultimate goal of the government is to ban the sale of firearms to the public. By starting out small, and having big goals, later generations will enjoy peaceful lives.
Around 1788, James Madison stated that the Second Amendment was written to assure the southern states that Congress would not “undermine the slave system by disarming the militia, which were then the principal instruments of slave control throughout the South” (Bogus 1). Gun control laws, which are laws that determine how guns are used and who can own them, originated from the second amendment. Throughout American history, gun control laws have continually been altered. Beginning in the 1930s, President Roosevelt won the approval of the National Firearms Act of 1938, which “prohibited sales to individuals under indictment or convicted of crimes of violence” (“History of gun-control”). About thirty years later, the assassination of John F. Kennedy once again put gun control under the national spotlight. President Lyndon B. Johnson responded by implementing the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 and the Gun Control Act of 1968. These acts “prohibited all convicted felons, drug users, and the mentally ill from buying guns” (“History of gun-control”). Twenty-five years later, background checks ...
I want to prevent would-be killers from having access to weapons of war. I want to stop them from teaching themselves to kill through video games. I want mental-health services to be more easily obtained. And I want to deny murderers the notoriety they seek. Our leaders must attack the entire problem--and if they do, I believe my fellow gun owners will have their back.(P. 10)
The gun control laws have a positive side and a negative side about it. One positive is how it prevents a convicted felon from buying or owning and having possession of any type of firearm which helps to prevent any future crimes from that individual. This prevention is done by a background check known as “The Brady Background Check", which is the process of this background check that is completed by a (FFL) Federal Firearms Licensed person. This licensed individual must get specific information from the person wanting to purchase the firearm and put the information into a computer database known as the “National Instant Criminal Background Check System” (NICS). The following would be some of the information needed from the purchaser to complete the check: the purchasers full legal name, nickname, and date of birth, current address, past address, phone number, color of eyes, and color of hair, race, and gender. They would also need to fill out a form as to whether or not the firearm is being purchased for someone else or themselves. This database would crosscheck three datab...
Throughout the years there has been an ongoing debate over the Second Amendment and how it should be interpreted. The issue that is being debated is whether our government has the right to regulate guns. The answer of who has which rights lies within how one interprets the Second Amendment. With this being the case, one must also think about what circumstances the Framers were under when this Amendment was written. There are two major sides to this debate, one being the collective side, which feels that the right was given for collective purposes only. This side is in favor of having stricter gun control laws, as they feel that by having stricter laws the number of crimes that are being committed with guns will be reduced and thus save lives. However while gun control laws may decrease criminals’ access to guns, the same laws restricts gun owning citizens who abide by the law; these citizens make up a great majority of the opposing side of this argument. These people argue that the law was made with the individual citizens in mind. This group believes that the Amendment should be interpreted to guarantee citizens free access to firearms. One major group that is in strong opposition of stricter gun control laws is the National Rifle Association (NRA). The NRA argues that having stricter gun control laws will only hinder law-abiding citizens. The final outcome on this debate will mainly depend on how this Amendment is going to be interpreted.
Today in the United States there has much debate over the countries current standing on Gun Control. Some Americans lean more towards supporting the bans, simply due to what people have seen with the mentally ill in the media today, these are often the indviduals who support restrictions that have been made on the purchasing of firearms. Others highly oppose gun control, standing firm by the belief that any form of suppression towards firearm ownership, is a clear violation of anyone 's constitutional rights. "In 1990, the Violence Policy Center announced that the debate must be switched from small handguns to large “assault rifles.” This led to states like California starting bans themselves on, "assault weapon magazines holding more than
In "The Effectiveness of Gun Control Laws:." the authors perform a surgical operation on the various views and issues as presented by the industry concerning gun regulation. The publication outlines the laws that have been enacted by congress concerning the regulation of firearms and shows their pros and cons. The authors suggest that there needs to be a more concerted effort by the executive as well as the judiciary so be able to enforce laws concerning firearm issuing and licensing.
Due to the alarmingly large number of public massacres, gun reform has yet again become a highly debated issue in America. In the past, laws were enacted that were meant to restrict ammunition and military classes of weapons from resale in the United States. Due to strong lobbying efforts of the National Rifle
US by restricting who could sell guns reaffirming that you need a federal license in dealing with firearms. Federal law at this time prohibited anyone from willfully dealing in firearms without a license. Congress in 1968 enacted the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act (Bryan), which states “that the ease with which any person can acquire firearms other than a rifle or shotgun…is a significant factor in the prevalence of lawlessness and violent crime in the United States”(Act 82 Sec 901a). (wasn’t sure how to cite?) This was law was specifically passed to prevent gun violence and Bryan v. US upholds this statue even if the person is ignorant of the law. This is because the public at the time of the case feared guns. That is why this case was enacted in the 1990s because the majority of Americans, around 60 percent, at that time thought gun laws needed to be stricter and the court answered by enforcing this federal statute. Bryan and Caron cases not only matched public opinion but the legal system. Gun laws in many states have become stricter and public opinion regarding these laws has shifted. By 2009, as illustrated in Figure 4, the majority of population thought that gun laws in this country had become too strict and the court responded to this
Over the last decade, gun control has been one of the hottest political topics nationwide. Those who support gun control believe that stricter gun laws reduce crime, while opponents of gun control believe that firearms are essential for self-defense. Both sides possess passionate views, and are usually unwilling to compromise their beliefs. What exactly is gun control? Gun control is a series of laws that limit the availability and ownership of privately owned firearms. Cliff Stearns, a member of the U.S. House of Representatives, claims that “Our society is a violent society. However, the innocent deserve access to the tools they need to defend themselves.” Gun laws should be relaxed in the United States because the 2nd Amendment prohibits the government from infringing on the right to keep and bear arms, a well-armed general population would deter the government from becoming abusive in the future, and finally, because access to firearms make it easier for people to defend themselves and their families.
The debate over gun control in America has constantly brought up over the years due to gunmen killing large amounts of civilizations in shootings. From Columbine to Sandy Hook or the shootings of the two reporters in West Virginia, these public shootings are occurring everywhere. Lawmakers and civilians alike are pushing for increased gun control in hopes of preventing the same tragedies. Anybody that has been affected by the shootings have been pushing Congress and state governments to force new sanctions on government. With the past three years, Congress has shot down all the laws despite the large amounts of public support. Adding more gun control isn’t going to stop the mass shootings from happening.
Gun control is an awfully big issue in the United States today. Many people in America don’t agree with the gun control laws that they have today. Gun control laws only take guns and freedom away from law-abiding citizens. Many citizens have their own reasons for owning a gun. Why would the government want to make it harder for people to own a gun? People that own guns aren’t very likely to be attacked by criminals. Owning a handgun is one of the best ways of protection when used correctly. The second amendment states “the right to bear arms”; does this grant everyone the right to own a gun? Gun control laws have not been proven to do anything for citizens. Gun control laws just make it harder for the good guy average Joe to own a gun. Gun control laws are not a good idea, and are taking part in the loss of our freedom that was given to us.
Listverse,. '10 Arguments For Gun Control - Listverse '. N.p., 2014. Web. 30 Oct. 2014.