Argumentative Essay On Gun Control
opinion Essay
1162 words
Today in the United States there has much debate over the countries current standing on Gun Control. Some Americans lean more towards supporting the bans, simply due to what people have seen with the mentally ill in the media today, these are often the indviduals who support restrictions that have been made on the purchasing of firearms. Others highly oppose gun control, standing firm by the belief that any form of suppression towards firearm ownership, is a clear violation of anyone 's constitutional rights. "In 1990, the Violence Policy Center announced that the debate must be switched from small handguns to large “assault rifles.” This led to states like California starting bans themselves on, "assault weapon magazines holding more than …show more content…
Literally as far back as to when our founding fathers wrote the constitution in the first place. However no matter what law is passed, there is no denying what the second amendment of the United States Constitution clearly states. "The right of the people to keep and bare arms, shall not be infringed." At the end of the day lawmakers decide what reform gets done, but every single regulation and bill that gets passed and has to do with gun control, ultimately gets judged by the second amendment alone. The issue of gun control, particularly with the passing of laws and their effects, is a complex one that many experts share different views on. From how news networks create reform that is demanded by the people, to how background checks have no evidence in the lowering of firearm sales or shootings, to just the shocking statisticts that come with Gun …show more content…
Obama 's additions to gun control has not effectively delayed our country from doing anything. The data is just ultimately not there. Once again the issue of gun control, particularly with the passing of laws and their effects, is a complex matter that many experts share different views on. From how Obama, to how background checks have no evidence in the lowering of firearm sales or shootings, to just the shocking statisticts that come with Gun
In this essay, the author
- Opines that the issue of gun control is a complex one that many experts share different views on.
- Explains the rise in mass shootings, despite claims that new background checks and other gun control laws would result in a firearm sales plummet. the violent crime rate fell by 4.4% from 2012 and was 14.5% below the 2004 level.
- Explains that barack obama has had more mass shootings in his two terms as president than any of the past four presidents combined.
- Opines that the issue of gun control is a complex one that many experts share different views on.
- Explains the rise in mass shootings, despite claims that new background checks and other gun control laws would result in a firearm sales plummet. the violent crime rate fell by 4.4% from 2012 and was 14.5% below the 2004 level.
- Explains that barack obama has had more mass shootings in his two terms as president than any of the past four presidents combined.
- Analyzes how barack obama's "state of the union" speech doesn't go into the process of getting the majority vote in the house and senate, and then ratification from at least three fourths of states.
- Opines that obama's additions to gun control has not effectively delayed our country from doing anything.
Harness the Power of AI to Boost Your Grades!
Haven't found what you were looking for? Talk to me, I can help!
Related
- opinion
- analytical
- Argument Essay On Gun Controlopinion essayWhen we think about gun control, we think of the right to bear arms, we also think about the recent media uproar and endless debates regarding this debate, due to the rise of recent mass shootings using assault weapons all over the nation.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that gun lobbyists believe such laws would violate americans constitutional right to bear arms and that citizens need weapons to defend themselves from criminals. the columbine high school massacre sparked a debate over gun control laws and zero tolerance policies.
- Explains that america's gun culture and gun laws received harsh criticism when in april 2007, the virginia tech massacre when seung-hui cho killed a total of 31 people including himself with multiple firearms.
- Explains that there are many factors that may cause difficulty in implementing gun control laws, such as politics and the second amendment of the constitution.
- Explains that gun lobbyists believe such laws would violate americans constitutional right to bear arms and that citizens need weapons to defend themselves from criminals. the columbine high school massacre sparked a debate over gun control laws and zero tolerance policies.
- Explains that america's gun culture and gun laws received harsh criticism when in april 2007, the virginia tech massacre when seung-hui cho killed a total of 31 people including himself with multiple firearms.
- Explains that there are many factors that may cause difficulty in implementing gun control laws, such as politics and the second amendment of the constitution.
- Quotes bill chapell's article of 6 new gun control laws enacted in california, as gov. brown signs bills. although individuals can register weapons, it’s unclear whether restrictions on firearms or even less regulations will effectively reduce crimes.
- Opines that laws need to be stricter on the type of firearms that can be purchased and/or who can carry a fire arms, which may reduce crimes.
- Describes the barriers that might exist in implementing new policy related to the issue, including those who are pro-gun advocates. the nra wants less restricted laws implemented with regards to adding restrictions to gun.
- Quotes nick gillespie's article, "gun control isn't the answer" as saying that politicians would call for tighter gun-control laws after the orlando shooting.
- Analyzes john wasik's essay on the economics of gun control, which recommends that gun owners be required to purchase liability insurance instead of taxing individuals with guns.
- Opines that stricter firearm laws and regulations may be impossible to enforce. the correlation between the effectiveness of gun control and violent and gun crime rates is still speculation.
850 wordsRead More - Gun Violence: Gun Control: Crime And Violenceopinion essayGun control has been around for many years and it has become a topic that has been talked about more and more often. However, gun control has created some differences on whether it is being used effectively and whether it is a good law or not. Gun control is the second amendment of the constitution and basically what it means is that it is the right to bear arms. The right to bear arms is a concerning topic for many people because now when a mass shooting occurs people immediately blame gun control but how do we know that gun control is the problem? People may think gun control is a good thing but in reality crime and violence are caused by many other things therefore gun control does not reduce violence.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that gun control is the second amendment of the constitution and basically what it means is that the right to bear arms.
- Explains that the gun control act was finalized on october 22, 1968, and has been changed many times since. the two principles are approached in different ways.
- Explains that gun control was established to "reduce" violence and crime, but there are many studies and facts to prove it.
- Explains that gun control is the second amendment of the constitution and basically what it means is that the right to bear arms.
- Explains that the gun control act was finalized on october 22, 1968, and has been changed many times since. the two principles are approached in different ways.
- Explains that gun control was established to "reduce" violence and crime, but there are many studies and facts to prove it.
- Opines that gun control was started to establish the right for citizens to own arms.
- Explains that gun control has not had a significant impact on murder rates due to people not respecting laws or the government not emphasizing the laws enough.
- Analyzes how the new study suggests but doesn't prove that increasing gun control laws in states will result in fewer gun related deaths. the study also has no adequate data on the link between gun deaths and gun laws.
- Analyzes how ruth bjorklund's book, "gun control", demonstrates how gun control increases violence instead of reducing it.
- Analyzes how different parts of the world have different effects with gun control, such as the u.k., ireland, australia, and australia.
- Opines that france and the u.s. have achieved nothing with their gun laws because they have been attacked and they could not do anything about it.
- Opines that reliable data based on gun use is hard to come by because it's not known how often a person points guns at someone who turns out to be harmless.
- Opines that many people will disagree with the assertion that gun control does not reduce violence because not everyone will have a gun and therefore no one is harmful towards anybody else.
- Opines that gun control may reduce violence in some states, but in reality it can't reduce violent crimes everywhere due to criminals smuggling guns illegally.
- Opines that gun control has a long history, but it does not reduce violence or crime. people need to stop blaming it for everything and start taking into consideration that it is not the only factor in violence.
1889 wordsRead More - Argumentative Essay On Gun Controlanalytical essayThe second amendment of the constitution states that “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed”. In my opinion, this means that people have the right to own guns to form a militia to protect the nation or to be used in self-defense against a criminal. Furthermore, denying the public access to firearms for protection will only result in more crime, because the only real deterrent to criminal activity is encountering an armed victim that is ready to defend himself. I am opposed to any form of gun control because laws prohibiting the sale of firearms does not protect the general public and restrict liberty.
In this essay, the author
- Analyzes how the laws banning guns from college universities did not stop seun-hui cho from bringing a gun to school and killing 32 students before killing himself.
- Explains that gun control laws are not just about protecting the public from criminals, but from their own government.
- Opines that people have the right to own guns to form a militia to protect the nation or to be used in self-defense.
- Analyzes how the laws banning guns from college universities did not stop seun-hui cho from bringing a gun to school and killing 32 students before killing himself.
- Explains that gun control laws are not just about protecting the public from criminals, but from their own government.
- Opines that people have the right to own guns to form a militia to protect the nation or to be used in self-defense.
- States that the brady campaign to prevent gun violence started in 1981 after jim brady was shot in an assassination attempt on president ronald regan.
967 wordsRead More - Argumentative Essay: Gun Control In Americaanalytical essaySitting in a cold, damp theatre in Cleveland, Ohio, surrounded on all sides by grey walls, dim lights light the stairway to the only exit. The movie begins, abruptly halted by a crackle of gunfire and the wails of those who stand in the paths of the bullets. Suddenly, the lone door to the theatre swings open, and five men armed to the teeth burst into the theatre, huddling the mass of people into one corner of the room. The men plan to execute every last person in the theatre one by one. Three of the trapped men draw their own weapons overpowering the attackers. Three people died in this shooting. If these heroes did not possess their weapons, every last person would have been slaughtered. Gun control defies personal freedom, implementation, and increases crime.
In this essay, the author
- Analyzes how gun control defies personal freedom, implementation, and increases crime in a cold, damp theatre in cleveland, ohio.
- Explains that the implementation of gun control defies basic united states amendment rights. the u.s. bill of rights states in its second amendment, "a well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, shall not be infringed."
- Explains that gun control laws cost upwards of 4.5 billion dollars per year to implement. an estimated 37% of americans own guns.
- Analyzes how gun control defies personal freedom, implementation, and increases crime in a cold, damp theatre in cleveland, ohio.
- Explains that the implementation of gun control defies basic united states amendment rights. the u.s. bill of rights states in its second amendment, "a well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, shall not be infringed."
- Explains that gun control laws cost upwards of 4.5 billion dollars per year to implement. an estimated 37% of americans own guns.
- Argues that gun control does exactly the opposite. 75% of gun owners said they feel safer with guns in their homes, because the presence of a gun deters crime.
- Concludes that gun control is a negative thing and that it is an unnecessary evil. they argue that americans should stand firmly against the demons.
649 wordsRead More - Argumentative Essay On Gun Controlopinion essaySince the development of firearms, human life has been threatened more than from the use of any other weaponry. Crimes related to firearms like mass killing, assault and homicide are increasing at a tremendous rate. Keeping the safety of their citizens in mind, many nations have formulated gun control laws as a major part of their legislation. Just like other nations, the United States has also passed out the Second Amendment law declaring ‘right of the people to keep and bear Arms’ (Worsnop). Gun control laws illustrated by the second amendment make drastic changes in gun-related issues. Not only does it restrict the usage of highly dangerous
In this essay, the author
- Opines that gun control laws are a major part of many nations' legislation. the second amendment law makes drastic changes in gun-related issues. gun-control law advocates support its effectiveness on tracing criminals and reducing crime rates.
- Analyzes how gun control advocates consider that the laws have controlled firearms which in turn reduce death and injuries.
- Explains that gun law opponents often raise questions over the issue of national debt for legalizing gun control law.
- Opines that gun control laws are a major part of many nations' legislation. the second amendment law makes drastic changes in gun-related issues. gun-control law advocates support its effectiveness on tracing criminals and reducing crime rates.
- Analyzes how gun control advocates consider that the laws have controlled firearms which in turn reduce death and injuries.
- Explains that gun law opponents often raise questions over the issue of national debt for legalizing gun control law.
- Explains that gun control advocates argue that limiting access to firearms will reduce gun-related crimes and accidental shootings, which ultimately results in better public safety.
- Explains that gun control opponents vowed not to allow lawmakers to frame such laws and discouraged the idea that restrictions will keep weapons away from criminals.
- Opines that proper implementation of gun control laws is only the best choice for stopping gun related crimes.
1339 wordsRead More - Argumentative Essay On Gun Controlanalytical essayThe United States has become a Nation in which anyone can own a firearm. The Second Amendment, which constitutes the right for an individual to bear arms, has become controversial among the American people. Advocates have struggled to come up with a solution to the ongoing debate of how to reduce gun violence and how not to infringe on the Second Amendment Americans are guaranteed by their Constitution the right to bear arms with good reason; laws seeking to control guns have been ineffective to the point where every citizen in every state should have the right to carry a concealed weapon.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that the second amendment, which constitutes the right for an individual to bear arms, has become controversial among the american people. advocates have struggled to come up with a solution to the ongoing debate of how to reduce gun violence.
- Analyzes cynthia stark's article "fundamental rights and the right to bear arms" where she argues that gun control supporters feel that specific types of firearms should be banned.
- Explains that advocates and opponents of gun control argue the nature and status of the right to bear arms. the second amendment allows citizens to resist government invasions upon any legal rights.
- Explains that the second amendment, which constitutes the right for an individual to bear arms, has become controversial among the american people. advocates have struggled to come up with a solution to the ongoing debate of how to reduce gun violence.
- Analyzes cynthia stark's article "fundamental rights and the right to bear arms" where she argues that gun control supporters feel that specific types of firearms should be banned.
- Explains that advocates and opponents of gun control argue the nature and status of the right to bear arms. the second amendment allows citizens to resist government invasions upon any legal rights.
- Explains that the right to self-defense is the bases in which a person has the rights to bear arms.
- Explains that the book "bijlefeld, marjolijn. the gun control debate: a documentary history" reports the history of gun control and debates spanning 200 years with over 200 documents.
- Explains that the 1934 national firearms act outlawed the transfer or ownership of high caliber guns and required registration for those already owning them.
- Describes the federal firearms act, which made it illegal for unlicensed dealers to sell guns across states. felons and fugitives were also banned from owning guns or buying one.
- Explains that the gun control act of 1968 required everyone who deals with firearms and ammunition to have a federal license.
- Analyzes how bijlefeld reports that americans believe mandatory prison could reduce crime more than gun control. a poll was conducted by the southern states police benevolent association to find the leading cause of crime.
- Explains that 93 percent of police officers agreed that banning firearms would not stop anyone from obtaining a gun. ninety-two percent believes that guns can be illegally obtained by criminals.
- Compares japan and switzerland, where crime and homicide are unknown. in japan most crime is committed by the yakuza mafia or by suicidal parents, while in switzerland everyone is required to take a few weeks of militia training.
- Explains that switzerland's low crime and homicide does not make it difficult for people who are not in the militia to obtain a firearm.
1192 wordsRead More - Argumentative Essay: The Gun Control Debateopinion essayMany big topics of debate are often taken much too far. One of these topics happens to be Gun Control. If you have ever been a part of, or even witnessed a Gun Control conversation, you would know that you may have to sit down and rest to keep yourself from passing out. Like the topics such as Planned Parenthood or Obama Care, everybody has their own well-established opinion. No matter what you wish to say or do, they will not likely change it. It is very common for people to create bias opinions about Gun Control, and will continually ignore any and all arguments of the opposite side. Some may even jump into talking about gun control with little to no sufficient evidence to intelligently continue a debate. Without researching with an open mind before creating an opinion, one may find themselves warping into one of those people. That being said, there are many
In this essay, the author
- Explains that many big topics of debate are often taken too far, such as gun control. people create bias opinions about gun control, and ignore any and all arguments of the opposite side.
- Opines that pro-gun control supporters believe that gun-related laws should be strict and heavily enforced, but they do not hope to take away one’s rights to self-defense.
- Explains that the anti-gun control side of the debate is equally confusing than the pro- gun control side. they argue that placements of bans on guns to just about anybody are unconstitutional.
- Explains that many big topics of debate are often taken too far, such as gun control. people create bias opinions about gun control, and ignore any and all arguments of the opposite side.
- Opines that pro-gun control supporters believe that gun-related laws should be strict and heavily enforced, but they do not hope to take away one’s rights to self-defense.
- Explains that the anti-gun control side of the debate is equally confusing than the pro- gun control side. they argue that placements of bans on guns to just about anybody are unconstitutional.
- Opines that there is no true solution to eliminating gun violence. having two opinions that conflict with one another makes it difficult to make up one's mind.
- Argues that if elected officials want to fix the issue of gun violence in the country, they should push aside their differences and put together ideas.
- Opines that there is already a compromise under-way to bring back safety into our lives and our homes.
- Opines that if the united states government made it illegal to make, use, or carry guns, there would be much less of a problem.
- Opines that we would be better off without guns, but there are many large flaws in their opinion. we have learned from our mistakes that people will always find another way to get what they want.
1718 wordsRead More - Argumentative Essay On Gun Controlanalytical essayWhen looking at the 2nd Amendment when it was first introduced and enacted. Our founding fathers were not concern about anything but making sure that our rights as citizens, whom they called the Bill of Rights, were protected from the new federal government that would be created. The founding father such as James Madison, who wrote the Bill of Rights, gave a very vague meaning of what it meant to bear arms. Many people who support gun control would say that Madison intended it for the federal militia and not for states others that oppose gun control state that it an individual right to carry and that the second amendment should be protected and not restricted. The debate behind whether or not guns should be control is very broad due to the fact that no law is the same when it comes to guns. For example in most rural areas in North America such as the southern states that law abiding citizens who uses use for sports feels that it’s a god given right to bear arms and that no government can take or infringe upon that right because of the 2nd amendment. These are the idea of federalism in America. Many opponents to gun laws fear that eventually their right to even have a firearm will be taken
In this essay, the author
- Analyzes how the national rifle association, founded in 1871 in new york and later moved to washington d.c, was the most public figure against gun control laws.
- Explains that the nra is in the limelight mostly during political parties because of the 1938 gun law which prevented the use of certain kinds of guns. gun control does not reduce the crime rate nor helps social or economic changes in america.
- Argues that gun control and the 2nd amendment debate is one that will be around for hundreds of years.
- Analyzes how the national rifle association, founded in 1871 in new york and later moved to washington d.c, was the most public figure against gun control laws.
- Explains that the nra is in the limelight mostly during political parties because of the 1938 gun law which prevented the use of certain kinds of guns. gun control does not reduce the crime rate nor helps social or economic changes in america.
- Argues that gun control and the 2nd amendment debate is one that will be around for hundreds of years.
- Opines that the debate over gun control is broad due to the fact that no law is the same when it comes to guns.
1080 wordsRead More - Argumentative Essay On Gun Controlanalytical essaySince the birth of United States of America, guns have been sewn into the fabric of American culture. Guns were used for many meaningful things in those primitive times. Guns were used to protect one’s property from wild animals such as bears. Guns were used to hunt down protein-rich animals to feed families. Guns were used to defend American’s newly constituted freedoms from savage criminals, Native Americans, and European forces. Guns fit well into the fabric of American culture has stood the test of time. Today, however, the fabric that once brought the United States prosperity is now fraying and flawed due to the excessive use of guns. This addiction has shown to be a problem in several areas of American society, and statistics prove America
In this essay, the author
- Explains that guns have been sewn into the fabric of american culture since the birth of the united states of america. the fabric that once brought prosperity is now fraying and flawed due to excessive use of guns.
- Explains how the 2nd amendment allowed citizens to own guns as an easy way to protect their rights. as technology grew in power and ability, gun ownership saw a steady decline.
- Argues that america's allowance for guns is causing a lot of gun violence that can be avoided. right wing politicians would argue that the founding fathers wanted this and the original constitution should not change.
- Explains that guns have been sewn into the fabric of american culture since the birth of the united states of america. the fabric that once brought prosperity is now fraying and flawed due to excessive use of guns.
- Explains how the 2nd amendment allowed citizens to own guns as an easy way to protect their rights. as technology grew in power and ability, gun ownership saw a steady decline.
- Argues that america's allowance for guns is causing a lot of gun violence that can be avoided. right wing politicians would argue that the founding fathers wanted this and the original constitution should not change.
- Explains that america's unique laws on the freedom to bear arms have made it easy for citizens to own guns. this high level of gun ownership has had almost direct association with gun violence.
- Argues that the national rifle association has accrued massive amounts of money in order to push their cause in influencing politicians, the media, and promoting gun ownership as a mandatory part of american culture.
999 wordsRead More - Pro Gun Control Debatesopinion essayGun control debates raise every year that bring a lot of attention to the people in America. The debate that many Americans face is whether or not laws should be stricter from preventing people to own guns. The debate is among advocates for pro-gun and advocated for gun control. There should be stricter laws because there is not any structure with gun control in the United States. Many agree to this statement and many oppose but both have their own reasons. The shooting at Virginia Tech and Tuscan, have many concerns about the control the government has on guns among many Americans. Previously there had been laws created to ease the tension but that didn’t have much power over guns. Now a days there’s always shooting going on and people want answers. Many people are being seriously injured or even worse killed, and the president not having much response on debates that need to be answered. Although gun advocates feel their rights as
In this essay, the author
- Opines that gun control debates raise a lot of attention to the people in america. the shooting at virginia tech and tuscan, have many concerns about the control the government has on guns.
- Argues that statistics can prove a lot when it comes to gun control, and it can decide whether gun laws would help reduce the number of deaths among citizens.
- Explains that the gun control act of 1968 mandated the licensing of individuals and companies engaged in the business of selling firearms.
- Opines that gun control debates raise a lot of attention to the people in america. the shooting at virginia tech and tuscan, have many concerns about the control the government has on guns.
- Argues that statistics can prove a lot when it comes to gun control, and it can decide whether gun laws would help reduce the number of deaths among citizens.
- Explains that the gun control act of 1968 mandated the licensing of individuals and companies engaged in the business of selling firearms.
- Opines that the shooting in tuscan, arizona by jared loughner raises questions about gun laws.
- Explains that the virginia tech shooting was a different situation where someone with mental issues obtained guns and killed people. these attacks change the life of many citizens which now wants more answers.
- Opines that obama didn't mention guns in his state of the union address because of omnipresent controversy surrounding the second amendment and gun control.
- Opines that the only people that oppose new laws are upset because they feel they are being stripped of their rights under the second amendment. if students were able to carry guns on campus, cho could have been shot down and lives saved.
- Concludes that gun control debates make many strongly taking the opposing or advocated side. new laws are needed to stop crimes and violence in the united states because there should be exception hen citizen take advantage of freedom.
1547 wordsRead More - Argumentative Essay: Stricter Gun Controlanalytical essayImagine sitting at your desk and passing notes to your friends across from you as your math teacher rambles on in the background when suddenly the classroom door bursts open, and the sound of your peers screams and gunfire fills the room. By defining the complications of abused gun control, by debunking the counterclaims of the supposed conveniences of lenient or nonexistent gun control, and by revealing strong arguments and personal observations, it will be obvious from information that will be presented that the American public will be persuaded to agree to firm gun jurisdiction laws.
In this essay, the author
- Argues that by defining the complications of abused gun control, debunking the counterclaims of the supposed conveniences, and revealing strong arguments, the american public will be persuaded to agree to firm gun jurisdiction laws.
- Explains that america's firearm management tolerance leads to more homicides, more suicides and more mass shootings.
- Argues that stricter firearm supervision isn't a good concept, since guns are valuable to citizens' protection according to the second amendment.
- Argues that by defining the complications of abused gun control, debunking the counterclaims of the supposed conveniences, and revealing strong arguments, the american public will be persuaded to agree to firm gun jurisdiction laws.
- Explains that america's firearm management tolerance leads to more homicides, more suicides and more mass shootings.
- Argues that stricter firearm supervision isn't a good concept, since guns are valuable to citizens' protection according to the second amendment.
- Explains that 34% of americans keep a gun, rifle or pistol in their residence in 2014. gun ownership is directed among older adults, rural inhabitants, caucasians, and people of the republican party.
628 wordsRead More - Argumentative Essay On Gun Controlanalytical essayGun violence in America is a public health crisis, which needs to be recognized and changed by legislatures, and the voting American. As conscious Americans, we need to vote for changes to gun laws that would improve background checks nation-wide, make firearm registration mandatory, restrict the sale of assault weapons and weapon modifications that give the shooter military-grade fire power, and invest in gun-safe technology and safe firearms storage designs. This type of technology will help prevent criminally oriented people from accessing guns, and will help prevent the accidental deaths of many children by guns. This essay will explain the reforms needed to help ensure Americans can still exercise their 2nd amendment right of owning firearms, and preventing the unnecessary deaths of many Americans at the same time.
In this essay, the author
- Proposes making gun registration mandatory with a local law enforcement agency. this would ensure that police and the f.b.i. can distinguish, disarm and penalize violent criminals.
- Argues that the second amendment to the constitution is outdated. gun deaths and gun violence in america is a growing public health issue that needs to be realized and reformed.
- Argues that gun violence in america is a public health crisis that needs to be recognized and changed by legislatures and the voting american.
- Proposes making gun registration mandatory with a local law enforcement agency. this would ensure that police and the f.b.i. can distinguish, disarm and penalize violent criminals.
- Argues that the second amendment to the constitution is outdated. gun deaths and gun violence in america is a growing public health issue that needs to be realized and reformed.
- Argues that gun violence in america is a public health crisis that needs to be recognized and changed by legislatures and the voting american.
- Argues that military grade assault weapons and large capacity magazines are a grave danger to society. voting americans can change this by supporting candidates who are strong on gun control and banning them.
- Analyzes kristof, nicholas, and lunceford's "armed victims: the ego function of second amendment rhetoric."
- States weinberger, steven e., et al. "firearm-related injury and death in the united states: a call to action from 8 health professional organizations and the american bar association."
1553 wordsRead More