Dudley offered about students unwilling to engage in the writing process. He states, “... it was students who intentionally copied ― knowing it was wrong ― who were “unwilling to engage the writing process.” I agree with this because more often than not, when students are not excited to write, they would plagiarize to get by. They would aim for the bare minimum to pass and never over because they are not interested in what they are being taught. In addition, they don’t understand the purpose of what they are doing and when that happens, they don’t put the effort into what they are doing. They just know that they have to do it for a grade, but a grade does not mean anything if it wasn’t done by the student.
At the end of the day we all know plagiarism is very wrong but some do not intend on doing it on purpose. Some students aren’t taught exactly what to do when writing papers and using other sources. To save time effort and also your grade it is recommended to never plagiarize. Give credit to every source you use even if it’s a just a little sentence or a couple of words. The credit due is what matters the most.
If students are sure and they don’t want to ask their teachers they can find loads of books on proper citation, what plagiarism is and isn’t and how to paraphrase things. In conclusion, people today may not think that plagiarism is that big of a deal. Those people do not understand the consequences of their actions. They could get a failing mark in a class they have worked hard in, or even worse they could be expelled from the college or university. Why would anyone want to take the chances of being expelled?
I could also have prevented plagiarism by not harboring any attitude of getting lucky by hoping my actions would go undetected by the instructor because I will be caught. Lastly, I should have been completely honest and strive to write new content for each assignment regardless of the circumstances because plagiarism is the most serious violation. My actions were inconsistent with the University’s expectation of me to seek truth and to develop for the good of society. My actions were also inconsistent with my intellectual and moral obligation to pursue my course of studies with honesty and integrity. Using reference without citation and previous work qualified as dishonesty and lack of integrity.
Because of this, existentialists think that reason cannot be absolute. Cause and effect relationship is concerned as determinism and it is approval when the scientist is in the state of being impersonal observation and experiment. As existentialists state, being impersonal cannot deal with personal experience. In addition to this responsibility is one of our basic experiences. “ Existentialism will teach us that we have to admit experience as evidence.”(Roubiczek, 1-17) If we don’t admit we cannot understand what we feel and we don’t feel responsibility for our actions.
Even though you aren’t necessarily stealing another person’s work, using your own work for more than one assignment is considered plagiarism. Some people utilize this thinking that they aren’t stealing from anyone. This has become a huge debate amongst many students, authors, teachers, etc. Some may argue that it’s a legitimate way to do an assignment and they agree that you can’t steal your own work. Others may say that it’s completely unethical and it should be met with the same disciplinary action as any other type of plagiarism.
Chapter six states that students with disabilities have a tougher time finishing their education rather than non-disability students. Another problem encountered in the classrooms is the teacher not letting the students have a voice especially when you expect them to follow the rules and daily routine. That type of teaching is called sham inquiry which does not educate the kids but just to keep them busy. Besides the sham inquiry there are different reasons for including students in regular classrooms one it’s expensive to have separate classroom and changes the instruction. People think that special education is very unique and only qualified individuals should teach those students but that’s not true.
If a teacher is not explaining an assignment in a way that a refugee student can understand, they simply lose interest. On the other hand, when students are unresponsive to a teacher they are considered “disrespectful” (Usman 112). Most of these classrooms struggles are due to miscommunication issues. Teachers should not assume that students are acting out. Rather, they should meet with parents and discuss how to deal with these issues (Usman 114).
That’s why students are not learning how to be originals with their work, and they decide to use someone else’s ideas, and not give credits to the author. Because some High School teachers don’t teach their students how to use a resource, and rightly give credits to the authors. That’s why it is better to teach the students how not to plagiarize in High School because the consequences in the college of this crime have an adverse impact on the rest of our
However, plagiarism is not only end with written work on the paper or some specific articles, but also involve ideas as well. Thus, it means that using an idea that came up with someone else without giving him or her credit, is also plagiarism. I think this is equal to stealing someone’s opinion or ideas instead of your own. Whatever you are the one of students, instructors, professors, or one of a writer and reader, stealing someone’s stuff will absolutely improper. As an international student, I did not consider that how serious the plagiarism problem could be, but after this experience, I had a strong understanding of plagiarism if trul... ... middle of paper ... ...write about.