Argumentative Analysis Of The Holocaust Museum

The Holocaust was one of the most uncalled for pieces of history for human events in the world. There are many written articles about this period and most of them had have a huge impact on the reader whether they are written objectively or subjectively. Holocaust texts that present information in a factually way, produce an objective perspective of the Holocaust. This can make the intention of the reader appeal to the reader’s intellect and inform the reader for information. On the other side those written in a more subjective way focus on expressing the reader’s emotions. Both methods of writing can affect the way a reader both takes in the article and comprehend actual historical events. The article, “The Holocaust Museum,” has shown how the author uses language and his attitude to produce this subjective document.

One of the sentences he uses is, “The buildings have been designed to make visitors uneasy.” The author had used the word uneasy to provide detail of how you feel as if you were there. It also to grabs your attention as the reader to feel the same feeling as the visitors. Another phrase he uses is, “You get the feeling that you're trapped, that something bad is about to happen.” The author used the word trapped to lure you in to the text and to bring out your emotion. Lastly one thing the author says is, “As you descend to the third floor of the museum, you begin to feel the Nazi net tightening around Europe's Jews.” One of the words he uses is, “net tightening,” this word makes you feel that your there and your emotions are just pouring out as if you are there witnessing it live and happening. In this article the author has used the element language to express his