Animal Testing Is Cruel

1740 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Benefits of animal testing for medicine

Animal testing is cruel and unreasonable! Animals are a total different species, then humans. What may work for humans. May cause animals' problems, or even in some cases death. Not only is testing on animals risky its cost is dramatically higher! No one understands the amount of money that goes into these researches. The bad thing is that the amount of money being used on testing poor insistent animals. The money could be put toward new technology. The new technology could save animals and human lives. Today there are many new types of tests. These testing’s could be more beneficial to new medications and cosmetics. Animals shouldn’t have to be put on the spot to save us. Animals are capable of feeling and enduring as much pain as humans do! …show more content…

Things need to change. Experiments need to end! Also new technology needs to be brought up and used. Animals that are being used for testing are dramatically different than humans. The article called “33 Reasons why animal testing is pointless”
States that “Less than 2% of human illnesses are ever seen in animals.” That means that 98% of the human illnesses don’t even affect animals. But yet animals are used to research and test out medications and cosmetics for humans.
When there's no common ground. If animals don’t get human illnesses that often. Then why is the government using them for human health and cosmetic research? Another thing is that most human health side effects from medications hardly ever occur in animals.
Scientists can't reproduce most common human death diseases in labs. Two of the most common human killers are cancer, and heart disease. The government can't use animal testing to find the cures to the two most common killers. How do they expect to find any other cures from testing done on animals? The article “33 Reasons why animal testing is pointless” states that “ In America 106,000 deaths a year are attributed to reactions to medical drugs.” That’s …show more content…

Not poor little loving animals. If the medications are killing a high amount of humans. Then what do you think they are going to do to animals? Not only are the products going to affect the animals. The animals that are being tested have to go through certain guidelines. The article called “Animal experimentation pros and cons”, Mentions something about how the animals are forced to try the products. Some animals may be forced to consume different types of things. The article also says something about some animals may be starved in the process of testing. They may also be forced to eat too much. The animals are doing humans a big favor by being their testing equipment. Why are the animals being treated so badly? Should this really be a thing? Torturing poor little animals by putting them through all this danger. All just for medication and cosmetics. Its pointless ! Especially when there are new ways to test medications and cosmetics. That don’t have to deal with the use of animal. Animal testing is far more expensive , then any other type of testing. Just for an animal to have a DNA test it costs the government an entire 3200 dollars. For researchers to do a two- species cancer study the government will end up spending any where to 4 million dollars. Yeah! That’s expensive. Cancer is one of the leading causes of death in America. One that government keeps testing for. Those test the government are doing for no reason are costing us 4 million dollars. That’s 4

Show More
Related

  • Annotations For The Article: Animal Testing Is Bad Science

    1656 Words  | 4 Pages

    Animals should not be used as test subjects for any research. The innocent and helpless animals’ rights are being violated when they are involved during animal experimentation. These unfortunate animals do not have a choice whether or not they want to be involved in testing. They are not intended for people to experiment on for their own selfish reasons. It is not right to take advantage of the animals because they are helpless and cannot protect themselves. Animals and humans have similarities; they both behave, feel, think, and experience pain. Therefore, animals should be treated with the same respect as humans. The pain and suffering an animal is forced to endure is not worth any new product. It is cruel and inhumane to take advantage of an innocent animal. These tests that use animals to ensure the safety of products are extremely common without people even knowing about it. It is not fair to these animals to abuse their beauty. They are helpless and cannot control what is happening to them. Animal experimentation should be stopped because it violates the rights of animals and harms or even kills the animals.

    Read More

  • Animal Testing Cruel And Inhumane

    532 Words  | 2 Pages

    Over 100 Million animals are burned, crippled, poisoned and abused in testing labs every year. Animals are used to test the safety of products, advance scientific research, and develop models to study disease and to develop new medical treatments, all for the sake of mankind. Animals should not be used for scientific research because animal testing is inhumane, other testing methods now exist, and animals are very different from human beings. While animal testing has led to many life-saving cures, animal testing is cruel and inhumane because it involves inflicting pain and harm on the test subject to study its effects and remedies. Testing involves physically restraining, force-feeding, and depriving animals of food and water.

    Read More

  • Essay On Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing

    947 Words  | 2 Pages

    In fact, it’s rare for the drugs that are tested on animals to be safe for humans. 95% of drugs fail in human trials, despite passing animal test, whether it be because the drug didn’t work or it was not safe for consumption. Really, testing cosmetics or other kinds of drug on any animal that isn’t a primate lacks sufficient statistical insight. Also, most pharmaceutical drugs have an abundance of side-effects, unfortunately, animal testing can only predict only 19% of the 93 possible. Finally, the most popular animals used in testing our mice and rats, which make up for 81% of the animals killed each year from animal research, when used in test are only 43% accurate for the safety of drugs used for

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing

    1983 Words  | 4 Pages

    ...e outrageously painful and sometimes deadly to the animals. How on earth is that humane? Some animals even end up having permanent disabilities from all the chemical testing. The findings and conclusions from animal testing rarely work the same way on humans and an enormous amount of money is spent on failed attempts. The rate of success of transferring test results to humans is too low to justify the expense. Taxpayers would be wise to invest this money in alternative methods such as technological advancements. While it may not be possible to completely diminish animal testing, significant reductions need to be made in order to advance the state of technology and improve overall results. Advancements in medicine must be made without perpetuating needless suffering to helpless creatures. Testing needs to stop; animals don’t deserve any of this painful punishment.

    Read More

  • Ethical Issues In Animal Testing

    1474 Words  | 3 Pages

    It should be noted that, animals are metabolically, physiologically, and anatomically unlike from human beings, hence, the tests working on animals can surely prove to be unsuccessful in human beings (Animal Experimentation). Animals react very differently compared to human beings, and therefore, tests done on animals can be hazardous when done on human beings. In addition, even though humans and animals share a number of biological traits, they have biological differences and this is enough reason to question the data obtained from animal experiments and is to be used on humans. It is very wrong to subject animals to cruel procedures in the name of promoting the future human health and this denies them a normal life, yet they are at liberty to yet there is no prove that these tests can work well on human beings. For example, guinea pigs are used in animal experimentation, yet a guinea pig and a human being react very differently to some drugs, for instance penicillin is toxic to a guinea pig, and a cure to human beings. This proves that, any test done on a guinea pig will automatically be unsafe for human beings. Another example is that, drugs that are effective on dogs, or other animals can fail to be effective on human beings. Therefore, it is important to note that, animal testing has its

    Read More

  • Animal Testing: Unnecessary Pain for Dubious Gain

    1607 Words  | 4 Pages

    Animals and humans have different genes meaning that the products being used are going to have different effects on different species (Burrell). After a drug has been tested on a animal, the drug still has to go through a human trial. Which means that the drug they just spent all that time testing on the animal, still needs to be tested on a human to actually make it purchasable. Sadly, “92% of experimental drugs that are safe and effective in animals fail in human clinical trials because they are too dangerous or don’t work” (“11 Facts”). Meaning that most of the drugs used on animals, actually are not benefiting humans. A few of the drugs passed from animals, were detrimental to humans. For example, a arthritis drug tested on mice, seemed to protect their hearts, but when used on humans, it was the cause of heart attacks and sudden cardiac deaths (“12 Pros and Cons”). Even when some drugs are passed, they show some side effects that were not shown during the test trial. Animals have been used to help the “war on cancer”, but the tests haven’t transferred from humans to animals. The former head of the National Cancer Institute, Richard Klausner, has stated, “The history of cancer research has been a history of curing cancer in the mouse. We have cured mice of cancer for decades and it simply didn’t work in humans” (“Animal Testing”). Meaning that they have learned the ways of curing mice with

    Read More

  • Is Animal Testing Wrong

    990 Words  | 2 Pages

    Safer alternatives are out there, and they are becoming more accurate as technology improves. Let’s face it, this is the 21st century. As technology keeps advancing, animal testing just seems pointless in our modern world. Scientists have developed effective, non-animal research methods that are cheaper, faster, and more accurate than animal tests. This includes vitro and micro dosing testing as well as computer models. Vitro testing, such as studying cell cultures in a petri dish, can produce more precise results than animal testing because human cells can be used. Micro dosing, the administering of doses too small to cause adverse reactions, can be used in human volunteers whose blood is then analyzed. Computer models, such as virtual reconstructions of human molecular structures, can predict the toxicity of substances without invasive experiments on animals. Out of all the hundreds of techniques available, cell culture toxicology methods give accuracy rates of 80-85 percent. All these new forms of testing are the way of the future. It’s time to let animals be free instead of living these in barbaric conditions of science

    Read More

  • Animal Testing: The Most Harmful Effects Of Animal Testing

    731 Words  | 2 Pages

    Many drug administers reports that 92 out of every 100 drugs that pass animal tests fail in people so we are killing animals just so we can get medicine and drugs that don’t even work for us so why even test the animals if we are going to fail when the drug and medicine passes the animals test and it’s pretty obvious that animals has quality’s like us but they’re not exactly like us like how pigs have the same type of skin like material that we have but it’s not exactly the same as our skin so just because they make a skin lotion that works on pigs it doesn’t mean that it going to work exactly the same way that it worked on the pig it might even killed you or give you a skin disease so basically there is no reason to use animals for testing because it might not even work for us even though it worked for th...

    Read More

  • Animal Testing is Wrong!

    938 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...eel as much pain through testing as we would if we got tested on. Therefore, it is up to us to aid these defenceless animals and to put a halt to animal testing once and for all!

    Read More

  • Animal Testing is Cruel and Flawed

    1229 Words  | 3 Pages

    Testing on the animals is conducted inside universities, medical schools, pharmaceutical companies, farms, defense establishments and commercial facilities that provide animal-testing services to industry. Some of the tests that researchers do on the animals are biomedical research, transplantation, drug testing and toxicology testing, cosmetics and other animal testing that are used for directional research, breeding and defense research. Organizations like PETA and BUVA think it is not a necessity for this testing. They think it is cruel, poor scientific practice, poorly regulated and that animals used for experimentation have an intrinsic right not to be used for experimentation. Many Americans don’t agree with testing on animals.

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay On Inaccurate Animal Testing

    504 Words  | 2 Pages

    By having inaccurate results the animals will die. This then leads to having to buy another animal; have the same process that could undergo the same inaccurate results before they get a good enough test for their products. Animal tests also have limitations because different types of animals can respond individually throughout the procedures. When exposed to the same chemicals; no animal is exactly the same. After the testing procedure is done and the animals somehow have survived they will kill them

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay Against Animal Testing

    1170 Words  | 3 Pages

    Not only do we have other options for these tests, but animals testing has actually been proven to be ineffective. Companies claim that this sort of cruelty will benefit the human population by testing the “safety” of the products, as they have been for hundreds of years and although this may have been helpful in the past, scientists have discovered otherwise. “While funding for animal experimentation and the number of animals tested on continues to increase, the United States still ranks 49th in the world in life expectancy and second worst in infant mortality in the developed world” (“Animal Testing Is”). This evidence shows that while we still continue to support and spend money on animal testing, it is not working as well as we thought.Essentially we are torturing the animals for a negative outcome, both for the human and the animal. The Food and Drug Administration reports that “92 out of every 100 drugs that pass animal tests fail in humans” (“Top Five Reasons”). If the products and drugs that we are testing on the animals are not working then there is no use in harming a harmless animal for them. Some may disagree and say that animal testing has enabled us to develop many life saving treatments for both humans and animals. But in reality there has been more cons then pros in animal testing. For example, “Animal tests on the arthritis drug Vioxx showed that it had a protective effect on the hearts of mice, yet the drug went on to cause more than 27,000 heart attacks and sudden cardiac deaths before being pulled from the market” (Should Animals Be). While animal testing has enabled us to create great products it is usually ineffective on humans and leads to animals being harmed for no

    Read More

  • The Barbaric Nature of Animal Testing

    898 Words  | 2 Pages

    Animals should not be victims of vivisection when they have just as much of a right to be here as we do. The money used for animal testing could be used for a project with better potential. Animal testing should not be acceptable considering all the alternatives that technology has the power to do. The abuse of animals in medical experiments is a flaw on humanity, the sooner we end it, the better.

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay On Animal Abuse

    1224 Words  | 3 Pages

    Animal testing is one the most beyond cruelty against animals. It is estimated about 7 million innocent animals are electrocuted, blinded, scalded, force-fed chemicals, genetically manipulated, killed in the name of science. By private institutions, households products, cosmetics companies, government agencies, educational institutions and scientific centers. From the products we use every day, such as soap, make-up, furniture polish, cleaning products, and perfumes. Over 1 million dogs, cats, primates, sheep, hamsters and guinea pigs are used in labs each year. Of those, over 86,000 are dogs and cat. All companies are most likely to test on animals to make patients feel safe and are more likely to trust medicines if they know they have been tested on animals first (PETA, N.D, page 1). These tests are done only to protect companies from consumer lawsuits. Although it’s not quite true, Humans and animals don’t always react in the same way to drugs. In the UK an estimated 10,000 people are killed or severely disabled every year by unexpected reactions to drugs, all these drugs have passed animal tests. Animal testing is often unpredictable in how products will work on people. Some estimates say up to 92 percent of tests passed on animals failed when tried on humans (Procon.org, 2014, page 1). Animal testing can’t show all the potential uses for a drug. The test results are...

    Read More

  • Animal Testing Should Be Banned Essay

    1269 Words  | 3 Pages

    The people claim that, animal testing infringes animal’s rights, makes animal suffering in the experiments, and some of animal experiments may never be useful to human beings. This is true, but we cannot stop animal testing. According to the article “Facts about Animal Research” by Cook (2006), the smallpox has disappeared from the earth because scientists get vaccines from cows. Also, the scientists got insulin, which is the only drug, which can control diabetes, from dogs and fish. Many medicines are related to medical animal experiments, we cannot give up medical animal experiments.

    Read More

More about Animal Testing Is Cruel

Open Document