Analyzing Willie Mae Thorton's Song Hound Dog

547 Words2 Pages

The song Hound Dog, by Willie Mae Thorton, is a very unique song. What make this song unique is the raspy and soulful sound of Thortons voice. Despite the loud and upbeat tones of the drum, guitar, and base, Thorton’s voice grabs the listener’s attention. Her passion and emotion is very evident as she sings the word of the song. You can hear her anger when she is signing about not feeding the dog anymore, a message that could be interpreted in many different ways. The way I interpreted this message was her telling the story of how men treat her. At the end of the song there are howls, which I feel is a way off her making fun of those who have belittled and hurt her in the past. I could relate to her anger in regards to this subject, which made me appreciate the song even more. The way she soulfully coveys her message made me want to hear more, understand her story more, and love her sass/dramatic way of telling a story through music. …show more content…

Despite being the same song, this version of the song is much different than Thorton’s original version. The tempo of Presley’s version is much faster and comes off less aggressive. His version of the song comes off more as a joke, especially with the drum rolls that accompany each verse. His version has background singers, whereas Thorton was the only singer in the original version. Presley also had a guitar solo in his song, which I feel took away from the original meaning of the song. Yet, Presley made the song his own by implementing his famous dance move during the drum rolls (Hound Dog, 1956). He also changed the song lyrics from the original of “you can wag your tail but I ain’t gonna feed you no more,” into: “well, you ain’t never caught a rabbit and you ain’t no friend of

Open Document