Analysis Of Who Owns Child Abuse By Gerald Cradock

712 Words2 Pages

Introduction
‘Who Owns Child Abuse?’ is a piece of literature drafted by Dr. Gerald Cradock. The article touches on child abuse in terms of how the meaning has changed over time. Cradock compares the nineteenth and twentieth centuries’ ideologies on the origins of the child abuser. The two centuries convey a distinct approach to differentiating between the abusers and the non-abusers. My perspective on the statements Cradock discusses is generally in agreement. I understand that people’s points of view change over time. There is a fundamental core of an ideology, but there is never constancy in the components that follow.
Summary
Cradock’s viewpoint on this topic comes from the symbolic interactionism perspective. We live in a symbolic world …show more content…

More specifically, it is a highly constructionist position that he takes on the topic. Cradock’s constructionist explanation regarding how child abusers are categorized goes beyond mere physical abuse. He emphasizes that there is no fixed interpretation of what child abuse consists of. In the past, people thought of child abuse is anything that can be seen or heard, completely ignoring the monumental sociological and psychological forms of the issue. This is one of the most important statements in the article. I agree with him in regards to the mistake of child abuse being a fixed ideology. If it were decided that it is to be seen as only a set of elements that constitute the problem, this would only make the issue more problematic. Cradock argues that if child abuse were a fixed property, then it could be eliminated by establishing guidelines to repair the complication. Shifting to my perspective, I think that child abuse needs to have an open-minded approach, rather than fixed. Having an unprejudiced view gives the ideology flexibility to change over …show more content…

The purpose of the article was presented clearly and in a method that catches the reader’s interest in the topic immediately. Although the author uses a constructionist approach to his findings, it would have been more effective if there was some form of statistical proof provided to back up his explanation on orphanages in North America and Europe. Stating that there were thousands of children being put in orphanages in Britain forces the reader to assume a number ranging from, 10,000 to possibly 100,000 children. Consequently, the connection the reader is meant to develop with the material is not

Open Document