Analysis Of The Film Avatar

667 Words2 Pages

The film Avatar is a cinematographic representation of a common duality found in modern perspectives of nature: nature as capital and nature as something that should be preserved. For the purpose of this paper, the term nature will refer to the physical world outside of humans and human creation – landscape, plants, animals, and so forth. The distant world of Pandora is the main setting for the film. The Na'vi are the indigenous humanoids of Pandora, whose tribe is geographically located on top of a vast amount of a highly valuable mineral – unobtanium. Humans colonized Pandora in order to mine this precious mineral. The Na'vi have a very spiritual connection with nature; they refuse to move their tribe and allow humans to expand their mining
Sternberg (2015) defines capitalism as, “An economic system characterised by comprehensive private property, free-market pricing, and the absence of coercion” (p.385). Similarly, industrial capitalism is an economic system that banks on investment of capital in technology and machines that are implemented to increase the production of marketable goods. With these basic definitions in mind, it is clear that industrial capitalism can lead to, amongst other things, overconsumption and the exploitation of resources. Define nature as capital here.
How does preservation compare to capitalism? In brief, the concept of preservation aims to keep something (nature in this context) in its original state, or to preserve it. According to Clarkin (2015),
The concept of preservation of wilderness emerged in the United States in the nineteenth century as a response to the large-scale disposal of public lands then taking place and to such economic activities as mining and logging, which had altered much of the western landscape…John Muir, who is usually cited as the first American preservationist, condemned the common perception of wilderness as an economic resource
According to Liebig’s Law, populations are limited by the minimum amount of resources that can be found at the scarcest time of the year. Perhaps this is why the Na’vi population is fairly low. In contrast, the humans in the film are living in an era where they are forced to seek resources from other planets, due to the overconsumption of earth’s resources. Whilst discussing the differences between the Native Americans and colonists, Cronon (1983) eloquently states, “The difference between Indians and Europeans was not that one had property and the other had none; rather, it was that they loved property differently” (p.80). Similar views exist between the Na’vi and the humans in Avatar. Indeed, the Na’vi princess, Neytiri, supports this idea in the film, “The wealth of this world isn’t in the ground [referring to the mining of unobtanium], it’s all around us.”  fix quote These contrasting ideas help to induce the prominent duality found in the film: nature as capital and nature as something that should be

Open Document