Analysis Of Photomontages Created By David Hockney

1413 Words3 Pages

The photomontages created by David Hockney are dramastically different from other artists pieces. Simply, this is because Hockney shows his view of the world as realistic as there can be when it comes to artwork. In photomontages there are various ideas, themes, and pictures combined as one piece of art. His aims are to capture motion within multiple snapshots. The goal is to prove that in a one point perspective piece an individual does not see an event occurring in frames. But, in Hockney’s photomontages the main goal is to let the audience see what a human eye really sees when analyzing a scene or event. In pieces of artwork like the “Jour de pluie à Paris” by Gustave Caillebotte that was created by using one point perspective there is only one visual. The visual it shows is of a street. The goal is to see how a community comes together by just analyzing one street. In Hockney’s visuals the goal is to see all of the little things the human eye ignores as it quickly glances at scences. The point seems to be that demonstrating multiple perspectives is what helps humans view the world as a whole. The …show more content…

The artwork known as Violin and Grapes by Picasso is a typical cubism piece. By using objects that look like a cube those objects jump out to the audience. These are the aims of both Hockney and Picasso. They want the audience to see all of the defaults and successes of the piece. They also want the pieces to have an affect and effect on the human eyes and the way they perceive things. In this painting one may get the sense that Picasso wants to show how difficult and artists artwork can be to create. It is not easy for an artists to show their creations or ideas. He shows that there are obstacles in trying to get the human eye to see what an artist sees. Therefore, it is agreeable to say that both Hockney and Picasso use similar aims in their

Open Document