Analysis Of Mikhail Bakhtin And Jouri Lotman

770 Words2 Pages

For quite a long time, literary theory has been devoted to the temporal dimension of narrative. However, decades before the spatial turn in literary theory, two major critics, notably Mikhail Bakhtin and Jouri Lotman, have demonstrated that the spatial structures of the fictional world are fundamental to the production of meaning. Their reflections and contributions to the concept of space have enriched literary scholarship. For Bakhtin and Lotman, the organisation of fictional space is mirror-like in the vision of the world connected with it. The literary text – more than it faithfully recovers the spatial model from which reality is constructed – transforms and transposes it poetically. However, the approaches of the two theorists do not overlap. Lotman starts with the study of …show more content…

Bakhtin finds, in fact, that literature reveals, through its generic features, the spatiotemporal constellation or organisation that is specific to a certain historical epoch. The genre is based on chronotopes that Bakhtin defines as “the organizing centres for the fundamental narrative events of the novel [….] that to them belongs the meaning that shapes narrative” (Bakhtin 1981: 250). These chronotopes function as “primary means for materialising time in space” (Bakhtin 1981: 250). The chronotope allows the author to create entire worlds using the organising categories of the real world in which he lives. This means that the author makes sense of his time and transposes the world from which he comes into the narrative. In this respect, Roderick Beaton identifies the chronotope as “the distinctive configuration of time and space that defines ‘reality’ within the world of a text, as conceptualized within that world itself” (2000: 181; emphasis in original). Therefore, the Bakhtinian concept of the chronotope can be seen as the artistic-literary condensation of a "real"

Open Document