Abstract: Since the end of the Cold War, the United States has been the world’s only unquestioned superpower. How the United States evaluates its position as global hegemon has important consequences for American foreign policy, particularly with regards to the potential for future policy constraints. Thus, this paper seeks to consider the question: How durable is American hegemony? The paper first defines the state of American hegemony and then considers the primary challengers: Europe, Russia, China, Japan and imperial overstretch. It will conclude that in the long-term, East Asian geopolitical instability poses the greatest threat to American hegemony, but that in the short-term, the hegemony will prove to be quite durable as long as the United States can counteract the phenomenon of imperial overstretch. In order to diffuse both internal and international threats to hegemony, American leaders should work to pursue national interests within a framework of consensus and legitimacy as much as possible.
In the following essay, I will look at the consequences of the American political and economic system as well as its public policies. Furthermore, I claim that America has built itself as an exceptional global empire, through political, economic and public policies, that center on capitalism. There are two parts to this argument. The first is about America’s exceptional global situation in which I will discuss the way in which America has made itself exceptional and held on to that position. The second part is about the effects and implications of America’s exceptional position on the world.
... specifies the powers of the President, yet the President has continuously expanded his power, authority to use that power, facilitated popular acceptance to use these newly acquired powers to compel behavior at home and abroad. Historically, these have been the defining factors of an empire, and moreover, an Emperor. This transfer of power has been efficient and will continue unchecked until Americans realize their place as global citizens in a rapidly changing world. The idea of an American empire seems like and illegitimate claim to most Americans, but it became a reality during the 20th century and has only been accelerated during the first decade of the 21st century. This has occurred because the President has the power to compel behavior, the right to use power to compel behavior, and widespread willingness to accept the use of powers gained by the President.
The author’s reasons for this are that the United States is the most powerful nation economically and technologically, in addition to having the most powerful army. This makes it difficult for one to argue with the unipolarity of the U.S. I believe that unipolarity exists, but I disagree with the suggestion that it is stable, as the stability of a system largely depends on the leadership, and within a unipolar system leadership will be all the more integral to the existence of the system. This is especially in a country such as the United States, as the leadership changes every four to eight years and the tactics used to deal with hegemony will change with those leaders, thus creating an unstable
Fareed Zakaria points out changes the entire world has experienced. At the closing of the nineteenth century the United States was the most powerful nation since imperial Rome (7). He stated for most of the last century the United States has dominated global economics, politics, science, and culture. But this has begun to unravel in the past 20 years (7). According to Dr. Zakaria, Taipei has the tallest building, which will soon be overtaken by one being built in Dubai, the richest man lives in Mexico, and the number one casino is not in Las Vegas but in Macao, and London is becoming the leading financial center (8). America still dominates in military at every level- land, sea, air, and space without breaking the bank. We will remain a vital, vibrant economy, at the forefront of the next revolutions in science, technology, and industry – as long as it can embrace and adjust to the challenges confronting it
During the late 1800’s and early 1900’s the United States of America began to claim itself as a dominant world power. During this time America began its campaign in imperialism and world politics. American presented great aggression and even contradiction in its play to become a world power. America would come under the guise of the helper but left with American authority firmly entrenched. No better examples stand than the long-term influence America had in Hawaii, on the Spanish-American War, in Latin America, and in World War I.
The United States was a little over a hundred years old and was already in prime position to emerge as a powerful leader on the world stage. However, it was not the only nation looking to assert its dominance in regions throughout the world. The United States would not stand idly by as the lands near its borders had foreign occupants when they could be in control instead. There was also a theory suggesting imperialism was the new way of the world and expansion was in the better interest of the United States. With opportunities presented in the Pacific, Caribbean, and Latin America to fulfill an American desire to expand power, the United States developed its foreign policy between 1890 and 1930 based on its own self-interests leading to the buildup of an American empire.
The climax of the United States’ evolution from honest expansion to dominant imperialism is marked at the turn of the twentieth century. Though attempting to abide by its own fundamental ideas and grow as a country itself, a rapidly growing competition around the globe resulted in America’s somewhat reluctant ejection from continental expansion to global imperialism. Though never straying too far from its unhindered adherence to its faith, the United States was eventually forced to force itself upon the globe, thus marking it as both a powerful world ally to some and a global threat to others.
The president has a significant amount of power; however, this power is not unlimited, as it is kept in check by both the judicial and legislative branches. The president is held responsible for passing legislation that will improve the lives of everyday Americans, even though he shares his legislative powers with Congress. The sharing of power acts as an impediment to the president’s ability to pass legislation quickly and in the form it was originally conceived. However, Americans do not take this into account when judging a president, as they fully expect him to fulfill all of the promises he makes during his campaign. By making promises to pass monumental legislation once elected without mentioning that Congress stands as an obstacle that must be hurdled first, the president creates unrealistic expectations of what he can fulfill during his time in office (Jenkins-Smith, Silva, and Waterman, 2005). A president is expected to have the characteristics that will allow him to efficiently and effectively lead the nation and to accomplish the goals he set during his campaign (Jenkins-Smith et al., 2005). There have been a handful of presidents that have been immortalized as the ideal person to lead the United States and if a president does not live up to these lofty expectations the American public will inevitably be disappointed. Since every president is expected to accomplish great things during his presidency, he is forced to created and project a favorable image through unrealistic promises. The combination of preconceived ideas of the perfect president and the various promises made by presidential candidates during their campaign create unrealistic expectations of the president by the American public.
Richard E. Neustadt, the author of Presidential Power, addresses the politics of leadership and how the citizens of the United States rate the performance of the president's term. We measure his leadership by saying that he is either "weak or "strong" and Neustadt argues that we have the right to do so, because his office has become the focal point of politics and policy in our political system.