High School Athletics: A Debate Between Two Perspectives

1016 Words3 Pages

Typically, the average day of a high school student consists of seven long hours of school; followed by an extracurricular activity. According to the National Federation of State High School Association (NFHS), as of 2014, there was a record high of nearly 7.8 million high school student athletes in the United States. Two experienced authors from The New York Times have contrasting views on athletics in schools. Amanda Ripley, the author of The New York Times bestseller, The Smartest Kids in the World, argues that sports should definitely be removed from high schools across the country. On the other hand, Donte Stallworth, former NFL player, is determined to keep children involved with sports. The main focal point for both Ripley and Stallworth …show more content…

He begins with putting an emphasis towards a great coach and what he or she has to offer. He believes that a coach can have a huge impact on a child’s life. He adds that a coach can be a great role model for athletes and teach them beneficial life skills. Stallworth believes that a strong coach and a committed athlete can go a great distance together and can achieve more than imaginable. He states that there is so much to be learned and much of it is not offered in an actual classroom. Stallworth uses “teamwork, responsibility, perseverance, [and] accountability” as examples of life skills that are learned through athletics. Stallworth does agree with Ripley that school is needed for basic skills, however, Stallworth believes that sports offer numerous amounts of skills that will benefit the athletes in their current and future life. Another aspect of his article portrays that sports are more than about winning, they allow children to “step out of their comfort zones and challenge themselves.” Much of his writing explains what many people overlook when considering children and …show more content…

However, they each have contrasting views on how sports will benefit or hinder athletes in their future. Ripley argues that sports are allowing children to think they could become the next Michael Jordan or Simone Biles. She states that athletics are giving children the chance to think they could be someone great, but believes that the athletes will be disappointed because they will not be able to pursue their dreams. She suggests that in the end, all of the time put into sports will be a waste, while the athletes could have focused on academics. Ripley is sure that the students involved in academic extracurricular activities, like debate or speech, will be more likely to succeed later in life and “rule the real world”. Stallworth, however, contradicts Ripley, saying almost the complete opposite. He gives the message that “the magic of high school sports isn’t about how a kid can go pro someday.” This statement implies that the power of imagination allows children to challenge themselves to be the best they can be which will later benefit the student athletes in their later lives. A portion of Stallworth’s article suggests that the skills learned through sports will allow the athletes to be more versatile in the real world. He implies that these skills are better learned on a court or field rather than in a classroom. When considering life after high school, Stallworth

Open Document