The dispute surrounding merit pay for teachers has existed for decades in many countries across the globe. The debate has been particularly heated in the United States. Since the 1920s, public schools began awarding pay mostly according to title, and seniority rather than merit. Numerous attempts have been made to introduce merit pay systems throughout this period, but it never gained widespread popularity on a national level. Now, however, political leaders such as Barack Obama have supported merit pay for teachers. This has reinvigorated the debate, with many groups falling on either side. The National Education Association, for example, has opposed merit pay, while the United Federation of Teachers supports the idea. The modern day merit pay, or pay-for performance programs offers teacher monetary bonuses for student achievement on yearly standardized test scores. Merit pay conflicts with the way we are to teach in today’s schools, and cannot be fully effective. This form of motivation, for teachers, will be impossible to be evenhanded, and the broad term of “merit” does little for the long term success of the students. No “good” teacher is in it for the money, anyway. This newly rediscovered answer, to public education, could set back and delay the entire system.
II. Article Summary
III. Multiple Discipline Analysis
As the public gains more concern for the quality of education, the more interest the public has in teacher accountability and performance. A recent poll stated that there is much interest by the public in linking student performance to teacher accountability (Wright, 2003). According to the guidelines of merit pay, the teacher has the sole responsibility of determining if a child is successfully ed...
... middle of paper ...
...(2010). Public opinion on merit pay: Self interest vs. symbolic politics. program on education policy and governance working papers series. Program on Education Policy and Governance, 1,17.
Hulleman, C. S., & Barron, K. E. (2010). Performance pay and teacher motivation: Separating myth from reality. Phi Delta Kappan, 91(8), 27-31.
Moore-Johnson, S., & Papay, J. P. (2010). Expecting too much of performance pay. School Administrator, 67(3), 22-27.
Moore-Johnson, S., & Papay, J. P. (2010). Merit pay for a new generation. Educational Leadership, 67(8), 47-52.
Protheroe, N. (2011). Performance pay for teacher. Principal, 90(4), 28-34.
Ramirez, A. (2011). Merit pay misfire. Educational Leadership, 68(4), 55-58.
Wright, R. E. (2003). Difficulties in marketing the concept of merit pay for primary and secondary teachers. Research for Educational Reform, 8(3),8.38-45.