Accounts of Miracles and Their Support of Belief in God

552 Words2 Pages

Accounts of Miracles and Their Support of Belief in God

The definition of a miracle is a violation of the "laws of nature", it

is an exception that is beyond all naturalistic explanations, meaning

they must be explained supernaturally. So do accounts of miracles

support the belief in God? Firstly, one must decided whether there is

sufficient evidence to prove the existence of miracles, something that

people have disagreed about a lot.

A McKinnon says that natural laws are just descriptions of the 'actual

course of events' so to say that a natural law has been violated would

be a contradiction, these events merely show that our natural laws are

at present inadequate. On the other hand, McKinnon's argument

presupposes the exclusivity of naturalistic explanations and there is

no a priori reason as to why a presupposition should be accepted,

unless one can prove that supernatural causal activity is impossible.

Also, one cannot assume that the law in question is inadequate if

there is a violation of a natural law, all that is inadequate is the

belief that everything must have a naturalistic explanation.

David Hume argues that one cannot prove the existence of miracles

because the evidence for miracles is less than that of established

laws; he suggests we should always look at things in a naturalistic

way and should favour the naturalistic explanations as opposed to

supernatural explanations. Hume believes that a wise person will

always look at the available evidence then proportion their belief

according to this, so therefore accepting a miracle would be

ridiculous due to the amount of su...

... middle of paper ...

...ion as

one cannot accept the exception as well as the rule within the same

structure. This is impossible. One must ask, what is a naturalistic

explanation? It observes nature, making empirical generalisations that

are known as 'laws of nature', and these have a certain predictive

value. This predictive value would be destroyed by any modifications

to some laws, which are so axiomatic to the structure of scientific

explanation. Trying to accept both the rule and the exception will

upset this structure and the very foundations of all scientific

explanation.

After studying arguments about whether or not one can believe in the

existence of miracles I believe that miracles do occur and that they

have a supernatural explanation as I believe there is more evidence to

support this, therefore supporting any belief in God.

Open Document