A Study on Partner Preferences in Relation to Height

674 Words2 Pages

This is an independent measures design, aiming to determine the preferred partner height between two groups of participants: male and female. The independent variables were the gender of the participants and their respective heights. The dependent variable was the preferred partner height, acceptable height range for a partner as well as satisfaction with partner height and partner height differences. The study involved the participants voluntarily being recruited to answer a short survey and provide basic socio-demographic information.

This research study should be classified as a quasi-experiment, as the independent variable (height and gender) is not manipulated by the researcher but occurs naturally. A true experimental design would have one single group, with a common measured outcome and participants randomly assigned. In this way, individual background variables such as gender do not that satisfy the requirements to be a true experiment since sex cannot purposefully be manipulated in this way. Furthermore, the participants were not randomly picked from the general population; instead all participants were instead first year psychology students from a large European university who participated in exchange for course credit.

A selection threat to validity has already been dealt with in this study only including heterosexual individuals. The reasoning behind this may be because homosexual participants would address the survey in respect to their own sexual orientation preferences; hence the answers provided by this group could vary or be more inconsistent as compared to the rest of the studied sample group, no studies having been done on homosexual height preferences as compared to their own. Therefore they have been excluded. Practically it would only involve asking their sexual orientation and not including their answers in the final results, whilst still allowing them to get course credit. These participants would have to be informed of the purpose of this study and be allowed to withdraw from investigation since their survey answers would not be included. Ethically, patients with same sex preferences may not wish to have their relationship preference or status known; hence confidentiality remains a small but prominent potential problem.

Furthermore, the self-report of the participant’s height is potential testing limitation, though in this paper referenced that self-assessment of height is relatively reliable. In most cases an overestimation of the participant’s height was expected. In a similar fashion, the accuracy of assessing heights of partners was found to be inaccurate, most often reporting a rounded number ending in either 0 or 5.

Open Document