A Few Good Men Rhetorical Analysis Essay

1556 Words4 Pages

Ender is first shown as intelligent and skillful, and Peter shows the same attributes throughout the story. Ender uses his intellect to triumph over his bullies, and this translates to his experience in the Battle Room. He has to outsmart the enemy, rather than beat them physically, and it worked in his favor the majority of the time. Ender understands when he has to use his physicality to beat a bully, but also knows when he has to strategize to avoid a certain situation. When Ender is encountered by Bonzo after he won the battle by disobeying Bonzo’s orders, he has to use his judgement rather than his fists to get what he wants. Ender argued with Bonzo, “‘... I’ll pretend that you won this argument. Then tomorrow you can tell me you changed your mind.’ ‘I don’t need you to tell me what to do.’ ‘I don’t want the other guys to think you backed down. You wouldn’t be able to command as well’” (Card 87). Ender understands what his enemy, in this case Bonzo, wants, and knows how he can make both of them get what they want. He doesn’t resolve to violence when he knows that he can use a different method that benefits him. Ender’s intelligence and strategizing helps him overcome the difficulty he approaches throughout his life. Peter also uses his intellect to benefit himself throughout the events that happen.
Peter Wiggin understands that the world needs him because he …show more content…

Both take on the features of the other, whether it be intelligence or violence, and both show qualities of heroism. Ender and Peter are both able to help the world, but the ways that they do it create different characters between two people who are similar. Famous author Brodi Ashton was quoted writing, “Heroes are made by the paths they choose, not the powers they are graced with.” Ender and Peter are both be brilliantly smart, but the actions they took with that power defined who they truly

More about A Few Good Men Rhetorical Analysis Essay

Open Document