3d Film Analysis

488 Words1 Page

Jonathan Winchell wrote an essay called, “Latest 3-D Films Add Dimension, Not Appeal.” This essay’s claim is that 3D doesn’t make a movie better, it just makes it cost more in theatres without adding any extra value. I agree with his statements because of the success of movies like Avatar film makers believe they should make more 3D movies to make more money. So many live-action films are re-rendered into 3D, and almost every time it just does not improve or enhance the experience because you can tell the film wasn’t shot in 3D. I understand Winchell’s point wholeheartedly because studios need to realize that not every film needs to be presented 3D. When they do decide to use 3D they should ensure the whole film is actually made from the beginning using 3D. …show more content…

He feels it simply isn’t necessary and has most certainly proven this with the epic movies like: “Inception,” “Dark Knight,” and “Interstellar.” It’s a distinction between movies shot in 3D, like Avatar, and those converted to 3D in post-production. Christopher Nolan has said that Hollywood is "pushing 3D to directors who are not comfortable or do not like 3D.” Another director, James Cameron, cited Iron Man 3 and Man of Steel as current blockbusters that didn't need to be in 3D. "If you spend $150 million on visual effects, the film is already going to look spectacular and perfect," said Cameron. However, the potential revenue benefits of 3D are amazingly high. The 3D release of films such as: “Journey to the Center of the Earth,” “Madagascar: Escape 2 Africa,” “Fly Me to the Moon,” and “Chicken Little” have made at least two times, and in some cases three times, as much as their 2D releases. According to idependent.co.uk, global revenue from 3D ticket sales in 2008 amounted to $240m, approximately 70 percent of which came from North

More about 3d Film Analysis

Open Document