Effects Of Sexual Orientation In Interpersonal Communication

918 Words2 Pages

Faculty Researchers wants to know Does sexual orientation have an impact on nonverbal behavior in interpersonal communication? Yes, sexual orientation does have an impact on nonverbal behavior in interpersonal communication. People can detect sexual orientation in homosexual or heterosexual rather they speak verbally, nonverbally or can be engaged in both communication skills at the same time. However, women and men have different ways of using body gestures and we will learn more about it throughout my paper.

The method was used in this study, half women and half men participants in the sexual orientation nonverbal test. All dyads consist of individuals of the identical sex. All homosexual participants were conscious of their own sexual …show more content…

They were then introduced for the first time by their first name when entering the observation room. The participants were free to choose a topic for their discussion provided it was about something serious and personal. The dyads were in the room by themselves for the first time being aware of the pre-installed camera pointing in the direction of their chairs. After their 20 minutes on camera there would be a knock on the door to end the session. Once the recording had been finished, the participants filled in a questionnaire to check on the legitimacy of the arrangements and to cover the participant’s subjective outlook of the situation before the purpose of the study was disclosed to them. They were guaranteed the tapes would stay confidential and the statistics used they will not be recognized also they can withdraw the consent to use their data at any time. At this time any question was answered as openly as the participants demanded before they were asked to give consent for their videotape to be used in the …show more content…

One of the participant from a purely homosexual dyad pondered the presence of the camera as exceptionally obtrusive and mentioned that it had a major influence on his behavior, he specified that he would rather his tape not be used for further processing. However, it was removed and the testing continues with the other candidate’s videotape, which the last five minutes were excused, because the projected length of the test status was identified for the participants and it could have had an impact on their behavior near the end as they possibly will try to bring the discussion to a close at an unnatural point. The tape was studied for different nonverbal body gestures using secret code schemes which were established based on the hypothesis that it would be possible to select those characteristics of behavior for recording which would serve as important indicators to answer the study question. The actual categories were defined drawing from existing coding schemes, which had to be modified to strike an equilibrium between scope, detail, and relevance. “The codes of the observation categories for body posture used the definition representing either a female stereotype (F), a neutral pattern (N) of behavior or a male stereotype (M)” (Knofler and

Open Document