Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The effects of her implementation
Essays on disadvantages of ehr system
Essays on disadvantages of ehr system
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The effects of her implementation
The effects of readmissions on population health Impact of readmission from SNF on population health can be estimated in various categories and perspectives. There can be especially negative impact and possible burden for our community to have avoidable or unnecessary readmissions, although some of readmissions are inevitable and planned. The major categories of the impact are population health outcome, such as death, disability, morbidity and quality of life, and economical measure, such as primary health care cost and other sectors such as cost for family/care giver, lost income, lost tax revenue and products, can be estimated as a means of measurement of impact of readmission on population health. The root of problem Financial What …show more content…
(Kripalani et al., 2014) Historically, fee for service model of insurance in US has put great pressure on shortening acute-care hospital stay and preventing readmission had no incentive for the acute hospital in the past. There were limited public or insurance measurements in terms of readmission, quality of transition, and overall outcome of patient’s health care. First, there have been more financial incentives for acute-care hospital side, such as Medicare readmission reduction program and penalty, also more bundled payment and shared saving models, which can be the more financial incentive and potential penalty for acute-care hospital and SNF. Another incentive is from being participating on ACOs, which “require comprehensive and integrated data and analytic systems that provide meaningful population data to inform care teams in real time, promote quality improvement, and monitor spending trends.” (Berkowitz & Pahira, …show more content…
(Lindenauer et al., 2007) However, this has produced multiple hand-offs due to involvement of multiple providers via not fully or partially interoperable or inter-communicable information and communication technology (ICT) and system. (Spehar et al., 2005) In terms communication, in fact, there were many SNF that still uses fax and paper chart to document and communicate with other organization and delayed full implementation of EHR or ICT due to the limited capital and the hardware/infrastructure for implementation. (Filipova, 2013) These trends may have accelerated the further fragmentation of health care delivery and challenging transition and coordination of care. Inconsistency in transition in care Third, There are inconsistency in transition in care and limited universality across the practices of each health care
Each model presents different types of earning incentives for physicians to provide cost effective care which improves clinical outcome.
The current health care landscape has been characterized by large scale consolidation and vertical integration of payers and providers. This has led to a handful of dominate players with substantial influence, and an increasing overlap in responsibilities between payers and providers. Although payers and providers have traditionally been on opposing sides, battling each other about quality of care versus cost-effective care, they are shifting to working together to achieve better value.
There is limited data on predictors of discharge and readmission for hospital inpatients. According to Rothman, Rothman, & (), “Unplanned hospital admissions are a major quality and cost issue in the US healthcare system”. About 20% of Medicare patients are readmitted to the hospital within 30 days, at an estimated cost of $17 billion per year (). Now that Medicare has begun to reduce payment to hospitals with high readmission rates, hospitals are looking for more effective ways of reducing readmissions. In order to develop new systems to address these concerns, there must be evidence in place to support to their use.
Pay-for-performance (P4P) is the compensation representation that compensates healthcare contributors for accomplishing pre-authorized objectives for the delivery of quality health care assistance by economic incentives. P4P is increasingly put into practice in the healthcare structure to support quality enhancements in healthcare systems. Thus, pay-for-performance can be seen as a means of attaching financial incentives to the main objectives of clinical care. However, reimbursement is a managed care payment by a third party to a beneficiary, hospital or other health care providers for services rendered to an insured or beneficiary. This paper discusses how reimbursement can be affected by the pay-for-performance approach and how system cost reductions impact the quality and efficiency of healthcare. In addition, it also addresses how pay-for-performance affects different healthcare providers and their customers. Finally, there will also be a discussion on the effects pay-for-performance will have on the future of healthcare.
The first cause of poor transitional outcomes, cost, affects those who most commonly suffer from economic social determinants of health. Those with no insurance or with gaps in coverage are less likely to receive transitional care in comparison to those with adequate insurance due to inability to pay for necessary medical care (McManus et al., 2013). The issue is additionally compounded by the fact that up to 30% of CSHCN lack insurance coverage
The demand of a constantly developing health service has required each professional to become highly specialised within their own field. Despite the focus for all professionals being on the delivery high quality care (Darzi, 2008); no one profession is able to deliver a complete, tailored package. This illustrates the importance of using inter-professional collaboration in delivering health care. Patient centric care is further highlighted in policies, emphasising the concept that treating the illness alone whilst ignoring sociological and psychological requirements on an individual is no longer acceptable. Kenny (2002) states that at the core of healthcare is an agreement amongst all the health professionals enabling them to evolve as the patient health requirements become more challenging but there are hurdles for these coalitions to be effective: for example the variation in culture of health divisions and hierarchy of roles. Here Hall (2005) illustrates this point by stating that physicians ignore the mundane problems of patients, and if they feel undervalued they do not fully participate with a multidisciplinary team.
...e crucial change needed in health services delivery, with the aim of transforming the current deteriorated system into a true “health care” system. (ANA, 2010)
From the hospital perspective mandating the health insurance will reduce the problem of Free riders into the Hospital and if a person who is insured visits the hospital for the treatment the cost of his medical treatment will not be totally absorbed by the hospital if the person is unable to pay for the treatment and the amount will be shared between the hospital and the insurance company.
In 2015, the Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services (CMS) released the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA) which implements the final rule which offers financial incentives for Medicare clinicians to deliver high-quality patient centered care.5 Essentially, taking the time to learn the patient’s goals and treatment preferences allows for the patient to walk away from the medical treatment or service feeling understood and cared for by the provider.4 Thus, resulting in a better, more comprehensive plan of care. Policy makers are hopeful that the new incentive-based payment system will accelerate improvement efforts.
Patients with chronic diseases do not receive established and operative treatments to help them successfully manage their condition. These complications are aggravated by an absence of organization of care for patients with chronic diseases. Nevertheless, the fundamental disintegration of the health care system is not unexpected given that health care providers do not have the imbursement support or other tools they need to interconnect and work together successfully to improve patient care (Brennan et al., 2009; Renders et al., 200;).
Hospitals recognized the need for the case management model in the mid 1980’s to manage the lengths of stay of hospitalized patients and the treatment plans (Jacob & Cherry, 2007). In 1983, the Medicare prospective payment program was implemented which allowed hospitals to be reimbursed a set payment based on the patient’s diagnosis, or Diagnosis Related Groups (DRG), regardless of what treatment was provided or how long the patient was hospitalized (Jacob & Cherry, 2007). To keep the costs below the diagnosis related payment, hospitals ...
Over the last few decades, various laws have been established with the main purpose of making the system equal and more efficient for all. The U.S. hospital system has become more complex and less efficient due to significant political and monetary interference along with the passage of these laws. The most recent amongst those laws is the Affordable Care Act (ACA), which was signed into legislation by President Obama in 2010. Various provisions in the ACA includes universal health insurance coverage, significant changes in the payment for health services and changes in the health care organization delivery and workforce policy. Thus, ACA has a significant influence on the current U.S. healthcare system.
Arguably, all three situations met by the end of the 20th century. The rise of managed care, the increase of health care costs, and the growing number of uninsured patients place economic and political pressures on individuals (and governments) to find a cost-containment resolution. Additionally, since the late 1970s, the medical profession has faced the dominating principle of patient independence as a challenge – first to medical paternalism and then extending even to the principle of beneficence. More so, the usage of the Internet and other global media has expanded the ability of patients to access an...
The recommendations would lead to increased costs, but again, the benefits in quality of primary care and efficiency of nursing practice that will result from this far outweighs the financial resources put in, into the long-term. The result will be a nurses’ commitment to patient-centered, quality, safe, and reliable care, as well as improved efficiencies in health care
Hospitals, long term care facilities, and mental health all serve as healthcare arenas serving the population in various ways. The hospital provides the most critical type of care, for the seriously ill. Hospitals originally served the poor and ill, but over time with the progression of technology and medical service specialties, they have grown to become healthcare meccas with many outlets. Over the past 30 years the degree of rigor of clinical practice and the scope of scientific knowledge has escalated greatly, and the hospital has become a center of high standards, scientific applications, and advanced technological capability (Williams & Torrens, 2008). The increasing shift of services to an ambulatory care arena facilitated by technological advancement itself has left the hospital with an evermore complex base of patient care, higher acuity, and higher costs (Williams & Torrens, 2008). Markets have changed, pricing pressures have increased, and consumer and payer expectations have evolved for hospitals, changes are constant in the medical arena, and hospitals are no exception.